Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 12:43 UTC

ibexa / admin-ui

PHP · JavaScript · TwigCustom license★ 7 stars⑂ 19 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ibexa/admin-ui holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated today. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IbexaOrganization
40 followers100 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistibexa/admin-uiv5.0.1033,6511321 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume419 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year419
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~28.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.0.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases28.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars7 stars
10.5/25Forks19 forks
5.8/15Watchers12 watchers
Inputs used
forks19
stars7
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
60.4/80Monthly downloads33,651 downloads/month across packagist
10.7/20Registry dependents39 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesibexa/admin-ui
dependents39
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,016,662
monthly_downloads33,651
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

91Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
51.3/54Bus factor7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 12% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth80 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor7
contributors_sampled80
top_contributor_share0.122
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
26.8/30PR acceptance1,763/1,972 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 23/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs1,763
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d11
prs_merged_30d39
prs_decided_30d42
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs209
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
11.6/25Owner reach40 followers of ibexa
25/25Track record100 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers40
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginibexa
public_repos100
account_age_days2,287
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history132 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesibexa/admin-ui
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.php, eslint.config.mjs, package.json ("prettier"), phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsibexa-bundle, ibexa-product
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 23/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://doc.ibexa.co/llms.txt)
27.2/40Legible commit history51 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://doc.ibexa.co/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.51
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.php, eslint.config.mjs, package.json ("prettier"), phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice12 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.12
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes1/1,591 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes61,547
source_files_sampled1,591
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

7GitHub stars
80contributors
419commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
7bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿
0Stars
19Forks
91Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201822021-112023-122025-12
Major 2Minor 6Patch 57

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 12:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 23/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 35
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbabdev/pagerfanta-bundle^4.5composer.json
Packagistibexa/content-forms~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/core~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/design-engine~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/design-system-twig~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/rest~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/search~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/twig-components~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/user~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistjms/translation-bundle^2.4composer.json
Packagistknplabs/knp-menu-bundle^3.0composer.json
Packagistmck89/peast^1.9composer.json
Packagistsymfony/asset^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^2.5 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/form^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/routing^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/security-core^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/security-http^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/translation^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/validator^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/webpack-encore-bundle^2.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^7.4composer.json
Packagisttwig/intl-extra^3.0composer.json
Packagisttwig/string-extra^3.0composer.json
Packagisttwig/twig^3.0composer.json
Packagistwilldurand/js-translation-bundle^6.1composer.json
All dependencies 58

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 35 direct and 23 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbabdev/pagerfanta-bundledirect
Packagistibexa/content-formsdirect
Packagistibexa/coredirect
Packagistibexa/design-enginedirect
Packagistibexa/design-system-twigdirect
Packagistibexa/restdirect
Packagistibexa/searchdirect
Packagistibexa/twig-componentsdirect
Packagistibexa/userdirect
Packagistjms/translation-bundledirect
Packagistknplabs/knp-menu-bundledirect
Packagistmck89/peastdirect
Packagistsymfony/assetdirect
Packagistsymfony/configdirect
Packagistsymfony/consoledirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injectiondirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contractsdirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcherdirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystemdirect
Packagistsymfony/formdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundationdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kerneldirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolverdirect
Packagistsymfony/processdirect
Packagistsymfony/routingdirect
Packagistsymfony/security-coredirect
Packagistsymfony/security-httpdirect
Packagistsymfony/translationdirect
Packagistsymfony/validatordirect
Packagistsymfony/webpack-encore-bundledirect
Packagistsymfony/yamldirect
Packagisttwig/intl-extradirect
Packagisttwig/string-extradirect
Packagisttwig/twigdirect
Packagistwilldurand/js-translation-bundledirect
npm@types/react^19.1.2indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.1.2indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree^8.62.1indirect
Packagistdama/doctrine-test-bundleindirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistext-zipindirect
Packagistibexa/admin-ui-assetsindirect
Packagistibexa/behatindirect
Packagistibexa/code-styleindirect
Packagistibexa/doctrine-schemaindirect
Packagistibexa/http-cacheindirect
Packagistibexa/notificationsindirect
Packagistibexa/phpstanindirect
Packagistibexa/rectorindirect
Packagistibexa/test-coreindirect
Packagistibexa/test-restindirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-dependency-injection-testindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunitindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfonyindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistwebmozart/assertindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.