Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 00:25 UTC

ibexa / headless

Ibexa Headless is a API-first composable DXP with a multichannel approach. It combines a headless CMS, DAM, and PIM, allowing seamless management of content, digital assets, and product information.

Custom license★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#cms#content#dxp#headless#ibexa-metapackage#ibexa-product

ibexa/headless holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (24/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IbexaOrganization
42 followers100 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistibexa/headlessv5.0.1021,6885262 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
14.1/18Commit volume — 36 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year36
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 51 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 62 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count51
latest_release_tagv5.0.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release62
mean_days_between_releases18.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

13Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

71Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
57.8/80Monthly downloads — 21,688 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesibexa/headless
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads394,232
monthly_downloads21,688
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

77Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 21% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.206

Issue & PR responsiveness

30At Risk
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
5.7/30PR acceptance — 59/313 decided PRs merged
4.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 15/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs59
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs254
first_time_authors_30d4
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.7/25Owner reach — 42 followers of ibexa
25/25Track record — 100 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers42
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginibexa
public_repos100
account_age_days2,347

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 62 days ago
20/20Version history — 52 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesibexa/headless
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish62

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ibexa.co
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscms, content, dxp, headless, ibexa-metapackage, ibexa-product
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ibexa.co
docs_sitehttps://ibexa.co
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 15/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

37Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://doc.ibexa.co/llms.txt)
21.9/40Legible commit history — 41 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://doc.ibexa.co/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.41
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

10Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars
25contributors
36commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
51releases
3bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Language breakdown unavailable
  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 00:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 15/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 34
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistibexa/oss~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/collaboration~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/connect~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/connector-ai-assistant~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/measurement~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/migrations~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/image-editor~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/oauth2-client~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/installer~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/product-catalog~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/product-catalog-date-time-attribute~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/product-catalog-symbol-attribute~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/seo~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/scheduler~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/admin-ui-extras~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/calendar~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/connector-dam~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/connector-ai~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/connector-openai~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/elasticsearch~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/fastly~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/featured~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/mcp~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/version-comparison~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/workflow~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/taxonomy~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/translations-management~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/tree-builder~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/content-tree~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/image-picker~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/share~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/site-context~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/headless-assetsdev-6.0-nextcomposer.json
Packagistgregwar/captcha-bundle^2.1composer.json
All dependencies 35

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistgregwar/captcha-bundle—direct
Packagistibexa/admin-ui-extras—direct
Packagistibexa/calendar—direct
Packagistibexa/collaboration—direct
Packagistibexa/connect—direct
Packagistibexa/connector-ai—direct
Packagistibexa/connector-ai-assistant—direct
Packagistibexa/connector-dam—direct
Packagistibexa/connector-openai—direct
Packagistibexa/content-tree—direct
Packagistibexa/elasticsearch—direct
Packagistibexa/fastly—direct
Packagistibexa/featured—direct
Packagistibexa/headless-assets—direct
Packagistibexa/image-editor—direct
Packagistibexa/image-picker—direct
Packagistibexa/installer—direct
Packagistibexa/mcp—direct
Packagistibexa/measurement—direct
Packagistibexa/migrations—direct
Packagistibexa/oauth2-client—direct
Packagistibexa/oss—direct
Packagistibexa/product-catalog—direct
Packagistibexa/product-catalog-date-time-attribute—direct
Packagistibexa/product-catalog-symbol-attribute—direct
Packagistibexa/scheduler—direct
Packagistibexa/seo—direct
Packagistibexa/share—direct
Packagistibexa/site-context—direct
Packagistibexa/taxonomy—direct
Packagistibexa/translations-management—direct
Packagistibexa/tree-builder—direct
Packagistibexa/version-comparison—direct
Packagistibexa/workflow—direct
Packagistphp—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ibexa/headless. Read them side by side →

98sanity-io/sanitySanity Studio – Rapidly configure content workspaces powered by structured contentExceptional96TryGhost/GhostIndependent technology for modern publishing, memberships, subscriptions and newsletters.Exceptional95directus/directusThe flexible backend for all your projects 🐰 Turn your DB into a headless CMS, admin panels, or apps with a custom UI, instant APIs, auth & more.Exceptional94sanity-io/pluginsThis monorepo is the home for Sanity Studio plugins maintained by Sanity staff and the community. It provides a centralized place for developing, testing, and publishing plugins that extend Sanity Studio's functionality.Exceptional94dotCMS/coreThe Visual Headless Content Management System for EnterprisesExceptional93sanity-io/clientJavaScript client for retrieving, creating and patching data from Sanity.ioExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.