Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-01 18:51 UTC

icepuma / temps

Parse human-readable time expressions in Rust. Supports relative times, dates, weekdays, and combined expressions in multiple languages. Works with chrono and jiff.

RustApache-2.0★ 7 stars⑂ 1 forksince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

icepuma/temps holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Stefan RuzitschkaPersonal account
38 followers15 public repossince Aug 2010@DATANOMIQ

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.iotemps5.0.02,198172 days ago
crates.iotemps-core5.0.02,24092 days ago
crates.iotemps-jiff5.0.03092 days ago
crates.iotemps-chrono5.0.02,20092 days ago
crates.iotemps-testhelpers5.0.01592 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
12.7/18Commit volume25 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year25
human_commit_share0.975
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases45 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~11.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tagtemps-testhelpers-v5.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases11.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars7 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars7
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51/80Monthly downloads6,683 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestemps, temps-core, temps-jiff, temps-chrono, temps-testhelpers
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads65,008
monthly_downloads6,683
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
23.3/30PR acceptance7/9 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs7
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.4/25Owner reach38 followers of icepuma
20.8/25Track record15 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers38
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginicepuma
public_repos15
account_age_days5,864
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable5 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestemps, temps-core, temps-jiff, temps-chrono, temps-testhelpers
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/temps
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicschrono, date, date-parser, datetime, i18n, internationalization, jiff, multilingual, parser, rust, time, natural-language-support, time-parser
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/temps
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages53
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:temps@5.0.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 53 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

87Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.8/40Legible commit history59 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.747
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,877
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapJustfile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice23 of the last 81 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 81 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesJustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.284
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, temps-chrono/Cargo.toml, temps-core/Cargo.toml, temps-jiff/Cargo.toml, temps-testhelpers/Cargo.toml, temps/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.025
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/22 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes56,281
source_files_sampled22
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

7GitHub stars
1contributors
25commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
45releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-01 18:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotemps-core=5.0.0temps-chrono/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono=0.4.45temps-chrono/Cargo.toml
crates.iochumsky=0.13.0temps-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioariadne=0.6.0temps-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror=2.0.20temps-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotemps-core=5.0.0temps-jiff/Cargo.toml
crates.iojiff=0.2.35temps-jiff/Cargo.toml
crates.iotemps-core=5.0.0temps-testhelpers/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono=0.4.45temps-testhelpers/Cargo.toml
crates.iojiff=0.2.35temps-testhelpers/Cargo.toml
crates.iomockall=0.15.0temps-testhelpers/Cargo.toml
crates.iotemps-core=5.0.0temps/Cargo.toml
crates.iotemps-chrono=5.0.0temps/Cargo.toml
crates.iotemps-jiff=5.0.0temps/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 83

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 74 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioariadne0.6.0direct
crates.iochrono0.4.45direct
crates.iochumsky0.13.0direct
crates.iojiff0.2.35direct
crates.iomockall0.15.0direct
crates.iotemps-chrono5.0.0direct
crates.iotemps-core5.0.0direct
crates.iotemps-jiff5.0.0direct
crates.iothiserror2.0.20direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioallocator-api20.2.21indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioar_archive_writer0.5.3indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocc1.4.4indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iodefmt1.1.1indirect
crates.iodefmt-macros1.1.1indirect
crates.iodefmt-parser1.0.0indirect
crates.iodowncast0.11.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.11indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.iofragile2.1.0indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.34indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.65indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.iojiff-core0.1.0indirect
crates.iojiff-static0.2.35indirect
crates.iojiff-tzdb0.1.8indirect
crates.iojiff-tzdb-platform0.1.3indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.104indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolog0.4.34indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.iomockall_derive0.15.0indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioobject0.39.1indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.15.0indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic-util0.2.7indirect
crates.iopredicates3.1.4indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.10indirect
crates.iopredicates-tree1.0.13indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.iopsm0.1.32indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iostacker0.1.25indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.4indirect
crates.iotermtree0.5.1indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.20indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.127indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.ioyansi1.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:temps@5.0.0 pulls in 53 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.