Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 02:08 UTC

idealo / terraform-provider-csd

Terraform provider for the common domain product

GoNo license detected★ 3 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗
#terraform#aws#route53#dns#hosted-zone

idealo/terraform-provider-csd holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (69/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (15/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

idealoOrganization
206 followers69 public repossince Aug 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/idealo/terraform-provider-csdv1.1.0-31235 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
17.9/18Commit volume — 97 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year97
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

55Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 5 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 730 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~128.5 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tag2.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release730
mean_days_between_releases128.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

15Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

7Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars3
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

49Weak
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 49% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.487

Issue & PR responsiveness

22At Risk
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
19.5/30PR acceptance — 177/273 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs177
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs96
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
16.7/25Owner reach — 206 followers of idealo
25/25Track record — 69 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers206
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginidealo
public_repos69
account_age_days4,715
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

61Moderate
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 1,235 days ago
12/20Version history — 3 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/idealo/terraform-provider-csd
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,235

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraform, aws, route53, dns, hosted-zone
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
3/7.5Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/12 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes23,331
source_files_sampled12
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
9contributors
97commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
5releases
2bus factor
1open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 02:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.17go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.25.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.40.1go.mod
All dependencies 88

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.7direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.17direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.25.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.40.1direct
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/armon/go-radixv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.16indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.24indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.9indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.0.11indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.30.17indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.35.21indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.42.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.25.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/speakeasyv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/cliv1.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-checkpointv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-ctyv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-pluginv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.8indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuidv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hc-installv0.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/logutilsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-execv0.25.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.27.3-0.20260213134036-298b8f6b673aindirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-addressv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchostv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamuxv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/huandu/xstringsv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergov0.3.15indirect
Gogithub.com/kunde21/markdownfmt/v3v3.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/goutilsv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/sprig/v3v3.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructurev1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalkv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/runv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/posener/completev1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpackv4.0.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmark-metav1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.18.1indirect
Gogo.abhg.dev/goldmark/frontmatterv0.2.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230626212559-97b1e661b5dfindirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.44.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appenginev1.6.8indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20251202230838-ff82c1b0f217indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.79.3indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with idealo/terraform-provider-csd. Read them side by side →

98gruntwork-io/terragruntTerragrunt is a flexible orchestration tool that allows Infrastructure as Code written in OpenTofu/Terraform to scale.Exceptional98databricks/terraform-provider-databricksDatabricks Terraform ProviderExceptional96gruntwork-io/terratest Terratest is a Go library that makes it easier to write automated tests for your infrastructure code.Exceptional94hashicorp/terraform-provider-awsccTerraform AWS Cloud Control providerExceptional94JamesWoolfenden/pikePike is a tool for determining the permissions or policy required for IAC codeExceptional90sassoftware/viya4-iac-awsThis project contains Terraform configuration files to provision infrastructure components required to deploy SAS Viya platform products products on Amazon AWS.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.