Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 14:18 UTC

ilia-brykin / aloha

aloha

JavaScriptMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

ilia-brykin/aloha holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ilia BrykinPersonal account
5 followers20 public repossince May 2018Prounix

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmaloha-vue2.66.25,5628682 days agoaccessibility-compliance-criteriaaccessiblealoha-vuecomponentsdirectivesfrontend-developersjavascript-librarylarge-scale-projectsutilityvue.js

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 277 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year277
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year35

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

62Moderate
How it's scored
49.9/80Monthly downloads — 5,562 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaloha-vue
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,562
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 72% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.725

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
31/42Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance — 59/64 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs59
open_issues31
closed_issues88
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.739
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

47Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of ilia-brykin
21.6/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginilia-brykin
public_repos20
account_age_days3,015
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 868 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaloha-vue
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ilia-brykin.github.io/aloha/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ilia-brykin.github.io/aloha/
docs_sitehttps://ilia-brykin.github.io/aloha/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

43Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

58Moderate
How it's scored
7.7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: axios 1.14.0 (high 8.7), lodash-es 4.17.21 (high 8.1), dompurify 3.3.0 (moderate 6.9)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
25.1/40No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 212 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories49
affected_packages3
assessed_packages61
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages3
Matched the npm:aloha-vue@2.66.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 61 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

10Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.6/40Legible commit history — 18 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.18
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — docs/jsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocs/jsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (docs/jsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/3,417 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes71,454
source_files_sampled3,417
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

4GitHub stars
6contributors
277commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
31open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 14:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@floating-ui/vue1.1.5package.json
npmaloha-svg1.2.0package.json
npmaxios1.14.0package.json
npmdompurify3.3.0package.json
npmfecha4.2.3package.json
npmlodash-es4.17.21package.json
npmmoment2.30.1package.json
npmtiny-emitter2.1.0package.json
npmvue3.5.13package.json
All dependencies 51

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 39 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@floating-ui/vue1.1.5direct
npm@floating-ui/vue1.1.6direct
npmaloha-svg1.2.0direct
npmaloha-svg^1.6.0direct
npmaxios1.14.0direct
npmaxios1.8.4direct
npmdompurify3.3.0direct
npmfecha4.2.3direct
npmlodash-es4.17.21direct
npmmoment2.30.1direct
npmtiny-emitter2.1.0direct
npmvue3.5.13direct
npm@babel/cli7.26.4indirect
npm@babel/core7.26.0indirect
npm@babel/preset-env7.26.0indirect
npm@eslint/js^9.17.0indirect
npm@eslint/js^9.23.0indirect
npm@jest/globals^29.7.0indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin^2.13.0indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin^4.2.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue5.2.1indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue^5.2.3indirect
npm@vue/test-utils2.4.6indirect
npmbabel-core^7.0.0-bridge.0indirect
npmbabel-jest29.7.0indirect
npmbabel-plugin-module-resolver5.0.2indirect
npmelement-plus^2.10.4indirect
npmesbuild0.25.2indirect
npmeslint^9.19.0indirect
npmeslint^9.23.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.31.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import-group^2.0.2indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jest28.11.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-vue^9.32.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-vue-pug^0.6.2indirect
npmglobals^15.14.0indirect
npmhighlight.js11.11.0indirect
npmjest29.7.0indirect
npmjest-environment-jsdom29.7.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmpug3.0.3indirect
npmsass1.83.0indirect
npmsass-embedded1.86.3indirect
npmvite^6.0.11indirect
npmvite^6.2.5indirect
npmvite-plugin-eslint25.0.3indirect
npmvite-plugin-static-copy2.3.0indirect
npmvue-eslint-parser10.1.2indirect
npmvue-loader17.4.2indirect
npmvue-pug-loader1.1.29indirect
npmvue-router4.5.0indirect
Dependency advisories 3

Installing npm:aloha-vue@2.66.2 pulls in 61 packages, direct and transitive: 3 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
axios1.14.0directhigh281.18.0
lodash-es4.17.21directhigh34.18.0
dompurify3.3.0directmoderate183.4.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ilia-brykin/aloha. Read them side by side →

98facebook/astryxAn open source design system that's fully customizable and agent readyExceptional98nuxt/uiThe Intuitive Vue UI Library powered by Reka UI & Tailwind CSS.Exceptional96unovue/reka-uiAn open-source UI component library for building high-quality, accessible design systems and web apps for Vue. Previously Radix VueExceptional94chakra-ui/chakra-uiChakra UI is a component system for building SaaS products with speed ⚡️Exceptional93shadcn-ui/uiA set of beautifully-designed, accessible components and a code distribution platform. Works with your favorite frameworks. Open Source. Open Code.Exceptional91ariakit/ariakitToolkit with accessible components, styles, and examples for your next web appExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.