Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 09:39 UTC

import-js / eslint-plugin-import

ESLint plugin with rules that help validate proper imports.

JavaScriptMIT★ 5,944 stars⑂ 1,548 forkssince Mar 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginhow this is determined

import-js/eslint-plugin-import holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (95/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (52/100). It was last updated 23 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

import-jsOrganization
56 followers3 public repossince Jul 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmeslint-plugin-import2.32.0214,987,075132452 days agoeslinteslintplugineslint-plugines6jsnextmodulesimportexport
npmeslint-module-utils2.14.0218,259,2833575 days agoeslint-plugin-importeslintmodulesesmodules
npmmemo-parser0.1.0201518 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 23 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18Commit volume — 30 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year30
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push23
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 57 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 452 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~67.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count57
latest_release_tagv2.32.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release452
mean_days_between_releases67.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

95Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 5,944 stars
25/25Forks — 1,548 forks
8.7/15Watchers — 37 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,548
stars5,944
watchers37
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

93Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesci.appveyor.com, shields.io, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 433,246,358 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageseslint-plugin-import, eslint-module-utils
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads433,246,358
unverified_packages_excludedmemo-parser
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.471
How it's scored
32.2/42Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
20.9/30PR acceptance — 735/1,056 decided PRs merged
10.4/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 8/10 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs735
open_issues488
closed_issues1,600
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d8
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.766
closed_unmerged_prs321
first_time_authors_30d6
first_time_prs_merged_30d8
first_time_prs_decided_30d10
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.6/25Owner reach — 56 followers of import-js
14.7/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginimport-js
public_repos3
account_age_days1,879

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 75 days ago
20/20Version history — 132 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageseslint-plugin-import, eslint-module-utils, memo-parser
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish75

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicseslint-plugin, javascript, import, eslint, code-quality, linting, lint, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages125
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:eslint-plugin-import@2.32.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 125 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
17.6/40Legible commit history — 33 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.33
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — examples/flat/tsconfig.json, examples/legacy/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-as-default-namespace/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-assign-default-namespace/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-assign-object/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-react-test-renderer/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-extended-config/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-no-compiler-options/tsconfig.json, tests/types/tsconfig.json, utils/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsexamples/flat/tsconfig.json, examples/legacy/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-as-default-namespace/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-assign-default-namespace/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-assign-object/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-react-test-renderer/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-extended-config/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-no-compiler-options/tsconfig.json, tests/types/tsconfig.json, utils/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (examples/flat/tsconfig.json, examples/legacy/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-as-default-namespace/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-assign-default-namespace/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-assign-object/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-export-react-test-renderer/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-extended-config/tsconfig.json, tests/files/typescript-no-compiler-options/tsconfig.json, tests/types/tsconfig.json, utils/tsconfig.json)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/574 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes200,011
source_files_sampled574
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5,944GitHub stars
100contributors
30commits, last 12 months
23days since last push
57releases
2bus factor
488open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,548 ⇿
0Stars
1,548Forks
28Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

4006008001,0001,2001,4001,6001,548122019-102023-032026-09
Major 0Minor 10Patch 18

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 09:38 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 10/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmeslint-module-utils^2.14.0memo-parser/package.json
npm@rtsao/scc^1.1.0package.json
npmarray-includes^3.1.9package.json
npmarray.prototype.findlastindex^1.2.6package.json
npmarray.prototype.flat^1.3.3package.json
npmarray.prototype.flatmap^1.3.3package.json
npmdebug^3.2.7package.json
npmdoctrine^2.1.0package.json
npmeslint-import-resolver-node^0.4.0package.json
npmeslint-module-utils^2.14.0package.json
npmhasown^2.0.4package.json
npmis-core-module^2.16.2package.json
npmis-glob^4.0.3package.json
npmminimatch^3.1.5package.json
npmobject.fromentries^2.0.8package.json
npmobject.groupby^1.0.3package.json
npmobject.values^1.2.1package.json
npmsemver^6.3.1package.json
npmstring.prototype.trimend^1.0.9package.json
npmtsconfig-paths^3.15.0package.json
npmdebug^3.2.7utils/package.json
All dependencies 94

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 74 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@rtsao/scc^1.1.0direct
npmarray-includes^3.1.9direct
npmarray.prototype.findlastindex^1.2.6direct
npmarray.prototype.flat^1.3.3direct
npmarray.prototype.flatmap^1.3.3direct
npmdebug^3.2.7direct
npmdoctrine^2.1.0direct
npmeslint-import-resolver-node^0.4.0direct
npmeslint-module-utils^2.14.0direct
npmhasown^2.0.4direct
npmis-core-module^2.16.2direct
npmis-glob^4.0.3direct
npmminimatch^3.1.5direct
npmobject.fromentries^2.0.8direct
npmobject.groupby^1.0.3direct
npmobject.values^1.2.1direct
npmsemver^5.7.2direct
npmsemver^6.3.1direct
npmstring.prototype.trimend^1.0.9direct
npmtsconfig-paths^3.15.0direct
npm@angular-eslint/template-parser^13.5.0indirect
npm@arethetypeswrong/cli^0.18.4indirect
npm@eslint/js^9.17.0indirect
npm@eslint/js^9.5.0indirect
npm@ljharb/tsconfig^0.3.2indirect
npm@org/package^1.0.0indirect
npm@types/babel__core*indirect
npm@types/debug^4.1.13indirect
npm@types/eslint^8.56.12indirect
npm@types/node^20.14.5indirect
npm@types/node^20.19.43indirect
npm@types/qs*indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^2.23.0 || ^3.3.0 || ^4.29.3 || ^5.10.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^7.13.1indirect
npma*indirect
npmbabel-cli^6.26.0indirect
npmbabel-core^6.26.3indirect
npmbabel-eslint=8.0.3 || ^8.2.6indirect
npmbabel-plugin-istanbul^4.1.6indirect
npmbabel-plugin-module-resolver^2.7.1indirect
npmbabel-preset-airbnb^2.6.0indirect
npmbabel-preset-flow^6.23.0indirect
npmbabel-register^6.26.0indirect
npmbabylon^6.18.0indirect
npmchai^3.5.0indirect
npmchai^4.3.10indirect
npmcross-env^4.0.0indirect
npmcross-env^7.0.3indirect
npmenhanced-resolve^0.9.1indirect
npmescope^3.6.0indirect
npmeslint2.xindirect
npmeslint^2 || ^3 || ^4 || ^5 || ^6 || ^7.2.0 || ^8 || ^9 || ^10indirect
npmeslint^8.57.0indirect
npmeslint^9.17.0indirect
npmeslint-doc-generator^1.6.1indirect
npmeslint-import-resolver-typescript^1.0.2 || ^1.1.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-eslint-plugin^2.3.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import2.xindirect
npmesm-package^1.0.0indirect
npmfind-babel-config1.2.0indirect
npmfind-root^1.1.0indirect
npmfind-up^1.0.0indirect
npmfs-copy-file-sync^1.1.1indirect
npmglob1.0.0indirect
npmglob^7.2.3indirect
npmin-publish^2.0.1indirect
npminterpret^1.4.0indirect
npmis-regex^1.2.1indirect
npmjackspeak2.1.1indirect
npmjquery^3.1.0indirect
npmjsonc-parser3.2.0indirect
npmleft-pad^1.2.0indirect
npmlinklocal^2.8.2indirect
npmlodash^4.18.1indirect
npmlodash.cond^4.3.0indirect
npmlodash.isarray^4.0.0indirect
npmmarkdownlint-cli~0.35indirect
npmmocha^3.5.3indirect
npmmock-property^1.1.2indirect
npmnpm-which^3.0.1indirect
npmnyc^11.9.0indirect
npmreact^16.0.0indirect
npmredux^3.7.2indirect
npmresolve^2.0.0-next.7indirect
npmright-pad^1.0.1indirect
npmrimraf^2.7.1indirect
npmrxjs^1.0.0indirect
npmsafe-publish-latest^2.0.0indirect
npmsinon^2.4.1indirect
npmtmp^0.2.5indirect
npmtypescript^2.8.1 || ~3.9.5 || ~4.5.2indirect
npmtypescript^5.4.5indirect
npmtypescriptnextindirect
npmtypescript-eslint-parser^15 || ^20 || ^22indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:eslint-plugin-import@2.32.0 pulls in 125 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.