Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 15:31 UTC

in2code-de / femanager

Modern TYPO3 Frontend User RegistrationTYPO3 Frontend User Registration and Management based on Extbase and Fluid and on TYPO3 (version 8 or newer) and the possibility to extend it to your needs.

PHP · HTMLNo license detected★ 50 stars⑂ 120 forkssince May 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined

in2code-de/femanager holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (89/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated 13 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

In2code GmbHOrganization · verified domain
28 followers100 public repossince Feb 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistin2code/femanager13.3.516,45110314 days agoformregistrationprofilefrontendtypo3fe-userssr-feuser-register

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 13 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 178 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year178
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push13
active_weeks_last_year27

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 68 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 14 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~27.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count68
latest_release_tag6.4.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases27.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
27.4/60Stars — 50 stars
17.3/25Forks — 120 forks
7.1/15Watchers — 20 watchers
Inputs used
forks120
stars50
watchers20
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.2/80Monthly downloads — 16,451 downloads/month across packagist
5.6/20Registry dependents — 6 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesin2code/femanager
dependents6
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads826,067
monthly_downloads16,451
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 85 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled85
top_contributor_share0.349
How it's scored
34.7/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
23.5/30PR acceptance — 197/251 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs197
open_issues78
closed_issues374
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.827
closed_unmerged_prs54
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
10.5/25Owner reach — 28 followers of in2code-de
25/25Track record — 100 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers28
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginin2code-de
public_repos100
account_age_days4,218

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 103 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesin2code/femanager
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

89Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.in2code.de/agentur/typo3-extensions/femanager/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstypo3, typo3-cms-extension, frontend-users, registration
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.in2code.de/agentur/typo3-extensions/femanager/
docs_sitehttps://www.in2code.de/agentur/typo3-extensions/femanager/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 50 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes37,045
source_files_sampled172
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

50GitHub stars
85contributors
178commits, last 12 months
13days since last push
68releases
2bus factor
78open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 120 ⇿
0Stars
120Forks
64Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012011732017-062021-122026-07
Major 2Minor 21Patch 41

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 15:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during GetBranch(main): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistsymfony/config^6.4 || ^7.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend^13.4.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-core^13.4.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase^13.4.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid^13.4.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend^13.4.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-seo^13.4composer.json
All dependencies 54

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 47 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistsymfony/config—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-seo—direct
npmgulp^4.0.0indirect
npmgulp-plumber^1.0.1indirect
npmgulp-rename^1.2.2indirect
npmgulp-sass^5.1.0indirect
npmgulp-terser^2.1.0indirect
npmgulp-uglify^1.5.1indirect
npmnpm-run-all^4.1.5indirect
npmsass^1.62.0indirect
Packagistbehat/behat—indirect
Packagistbehat/mink-selenium2-driver—indirect
Packagistdrevops/behat-screenshot—indirect
Packagistext-intl—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-pdo—indirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-browserkit-driver—indirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-extension—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistgenesis/behat-fail-aid—indirect
Packagisthelhum/typo3-console—indirect
Packagisthelmich/typo3-typoscript-lint—indirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstream—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmd—indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistsaschaegerer/phpstan-typo3—indirect
Packagistse/selenium-server-standalone—indirect
Packagistsjbr/sr-freecap—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-adminpanel—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-belog—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-beuser—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-dashboard—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-extensionmanager—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-felogin—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-filelist—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid-styled-content—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-impexp—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-info—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-lowlevel—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-recycler—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-rte-ckeditor—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-scheduler—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-setup—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-styleguide—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-tstemplate—indirect
Packagisttypo3/testing-framework—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.