Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 17:20 UTC

infection / extension-installer

Infection Extension Installer (autodiscovery of Infection extensions)

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 26 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗

infection/extension-installer holds a health index of 33 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (54/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). It was last updated 1026 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

33
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

33
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

29 followers16 public repossince Jun 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistinfection/extension-installer0.1.21,052,52231735 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 1,026 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.778
days_since_last_push1,026
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases3 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,647 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~362.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tag0.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,647
mean_days_between_releases362.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.7/60Stars26 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars26
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads1,052,522 downloads/month across packagist
7.8/20Registry dependents14 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesinfection/extension-installer
dependents14
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads27,718,591
monthly_downloads1,052,522
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 82% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.821
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution50% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance13/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs13
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
10.6/25Owner reach29 followers of infection
21/25Track record16 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logininfection
public_repos16
account_age_days3,333
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,735 days ago
12/20Version history3 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesinfection/extension-installer
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,735

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories24
affected_packages6
assessed_packages95
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 95 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
21/40Legible commit history11 of 28 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.393
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 36
8/8Automated maintenance8 of the last 36 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.222
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes15,378
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

26GitHub stars
5contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,026days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312022-112024-062025-12

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 17:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 4/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 95

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 95 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistamphp/amp2.5.2indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream1.8.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/ca-bundle1.3.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/composer1.10.26indirect
Packagistcomposer/package-versions-deprecated1.11.99.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver1.7.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/spdx-licenses1.5.6indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler1.4.6indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations1.10.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.4.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer1.2.0indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/advanced-json-rpc3.2.1indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.5.1indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer2.18.7indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.4.5indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises1.5.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.5.0indirect
Packagistinfection/infection0.15.3indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema5.2.12indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.10.2indirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper4.0.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.13.0indirect
Packagistopenlss/lib-array2xml1.0.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.1.0indirect
Packagistphp-coveralls/php-coveralls2.4.3indirect
Packagistphp-cs-fixer/diff1.3.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.3.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.5.1indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.14.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer1.1.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan0.12.91indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit0.12.20indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules0.12.10indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-webmozart-assert0.12.14indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.7indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.5.10indirect
Packagistpimple/pimple3.3.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.1.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message1.1indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.4indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type2.3.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.9.0indirect
Packagistseld/phar-utils1.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/config5.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/console5.4.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts2.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher5.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts2.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem5.4.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder5.4.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver5.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.26.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.26.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php701.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php721.26.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process5.4.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts2.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch5.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/string5.4.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml5.0.7indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safe1.1indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.1indirect
Packagistvimeo/psalm4.8.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.10.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/path-util2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 95 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
composer/composer1.10.26indirecthigh72.10.2
phpunit/phpunit9.5.10indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/process5.4.7indirecthigh28.0.5
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.4.5indirectmoderate77.15.1
guzzlehttp/psr72.5.0indirectmoderate42.12.3
symfony/yaml5.0.7indirectmoderate38.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.