Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 04:43 UTC

inference-gateway / adl

A declarative language for defining AI agents, their capabilities, skills and tools. ADL simplifies agent development by generating consistent, enterprise-ready code from a single manifest. Build faster. Deploy smarter. Stay consistent.

Apache-2.0★ 29 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Jul 2025View on GitHub ↗
#adl#ddd#domain-driven-design#domain-driven-development#sdl#standard#skills

inference-gateway/adl holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Inference GatewayOrganization
33 followers29 public repossince Jan 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 172 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year172
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 27 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count27
latest_release_tagv0.22.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

26At Risk
How it's scored
23.5/60Stars — 29 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars29
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.542

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 79/87 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs79
open_issues0
closed_issues27
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
11/25Owner reach — 33 followers of inference-gateway
13.7/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers33
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logininference-gateway
public_repos29
account_age_days543
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

59Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

32At Risk
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
8/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://adl.inference-gateway.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsadl, ddd, domain-driven-design, domain-driven-development, sdl, standard, skills
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://adl.inference-gateway.com
docs_sitehttps://adl.inference-gateway.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/reference/agent.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/reference/agent.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,800
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

38Weak
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — primary language unknown
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/1 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_language—
largest_source_bytes6,839
source_files_sampled1
oversized_source_files0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Type-checkable code. Remaining weights renormalized.

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

29GitHub stars
5contributors
172commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
27releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Language breakdown unavailable

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 04:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
4CI-Tests8 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 173

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 173 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@algolia/abtesting1.18.1indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-shared1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/client-abtesting5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-analytics5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-common5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-insights5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-personalization5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-query-suggestions5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-search5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/ingestion1.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/monitoring1.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/recommend5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-browser-xhr5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-fetch5.52.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-node-http5.52.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@docsearch/css3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/js3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/react3.8.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.83indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@shikijs/core2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.1indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue5.2.4indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.34indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.34indirect
npm@vueuse/core12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/shared12.8.2indirect
npmalgoliasearch5.52.1indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcopy-anything4.0.5indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex-xs1.0.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfocus-trap7.8.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmis-what5.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es3.1.1indirect
npmperfect-debounce1.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmpreact10.29.2indirect
npmproperty-information7.1.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmrollup4.60.4indirect
npmsearch-insights2.17.3indirect
npmshiki2.5.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmspeakingurl14.0.1indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmsuperjson2.2.6indirect
npmtabbable6.4.0indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite5.4.21indirect
npmvitepress1.6.4indirect
npmvue3.5.34indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with inference-gateway/adl. Read them side by side →

93proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qeAgentic QE Fleet is an open-source AI-powered QA/QE platform designed for use with Coding Agents (works best with Claude Code) featuring specialized agents and skills to support testing activities for a product at any stage of the SDLC. Free to use, fork, build, and contribute. Based on the Agentic QE Framework created by Dragan Spiridonov.Exceptional93Rotorsoft/act-rootEvent-sourcing framework for TypeScript. Three primitives (actions, state, reactions), Zod end to end, no broker required. Postgres, SQLite, or in-memory.Exceptional81Ahoo-Wang/WowModern Reactive CQRS Architecture Microservice development framework based on DDD and EventSourcing | 基于 DDD & EventSourcing 的现代响应式 CQRS 架构微服务开发框架Excellent81RailsEventStore/rails_event_storeA Ruby implementation of an Event Store based on Active RecordExcellent77event-catalog/eventcatalogThe discovery and governance layer for event-driven systems. Document your domains, services, events and schemas — for your teams and your AI agents.Good95AxonFramework/AxonFrameworkFramework for Evolutionary Message-Driven Microservices on the JVMExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.