Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-03 11:51 UTC

inferno-framework / smart-app-launch-test-kit

Conformance Testing for the SMART Application Launch Framework Implementation Guide

RubyCustom license★ 13 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#fhir#inferno#smart-on-fhir

inferno-framework/smart-app-launch-test-kit holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Inferno Health API Testing FrameworkOrganization
64 followers61 public repossince Oct 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemssmart_app_launch_test_kit1.0.3-320 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

48Weak
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18Commit volume — 7 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year7
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 31 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~60.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv1.0.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases60.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

24At Risk
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars — 13 stars
7/25Forks — 8 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars13
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

51Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
48.7/80Total downloads — 48,467 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessmart_app_launch_test_kit
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads48,467
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

53Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled18
top_contributor_share0.479

Issue & PR responsiveness

89Excellent
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
29.2/30PR acceptance — 112/115 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs112
open_issues1
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13/25Owner reach — 64 followers of inferno-framework
25/25Track record — 61 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers64
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logininferno-framework
public_repos61
account_age_days2,501

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 32 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessmart_app_launch_test_kit
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfhir, inferno, smart-on-fhir
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

43Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages134
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 134 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 92 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.92
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

32At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/176 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes19,956
source_files_sampled176
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

13GitHub stars
18contributors
7commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
31releases
2bus factor
1open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
28Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812022-032024-062026-08
Major 1Minor 5Patch 22

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-03 11:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests10 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 144

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 144 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactivesupport7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsaes_key_wrap1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsauth-sanitizer0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsbase62-rb0.3.1indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcp470.3.3indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbindata3.0.0indirect
RubyGemsblueprinter0.25.2indirect
RubyGemsbyebug13.0.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool2.5.5indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscsv3.3.6indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner1.99.0indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner-sequel—indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner-sequel1.99.0indirect
RubyGemsdate_time_precision0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdomain_name0.6.20260829indirect
RubyGemsdotenv2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsdry-auto_inject1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdry-configurable1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-container0.10.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-core1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-inflector1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-system1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-transformer1.1.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.7indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot—indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot6.6.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday1.10.6indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-em_http1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-em_synchrony1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-excon1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-httpclient1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http_persistent1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-patron1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-rack1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday_middleware1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsfhir_client6.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfhir_dstu2_models1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfhir_models5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsfhir_stu3_models3.2.0indirect
RubyGemshanami-controller2.0.0indirect
RubyGemshanami-router2.0.0indirect
RubyGemshanami-utils2.2.0indirect
RubyGemshansi0.2.1indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemshashie5.1.0indirect
RubyGemshttp-accept1.7.0indirect
RubyGemshttp-cookie1.1.6indirect
RubyGemshttpclient2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsinferno_core—indirect
RubyGemsinferno_core1.4.3indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.2indirect
RubyGemsirb1.18.0indirect
RubyGemsjson-jwt—indirect
RubyGemsjson-jwt1.15.3.1indirect
RubyGemsjwt—indirect
RubyGemsjwt3.2.0indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.5.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2026.0701indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.27.0indirect
RubyGemsmulti_xml0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsmustermann1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsmustermann-contrib1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnetrc0.11.0indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsoauth22.0.25indirect
RubyGemsoj3.17.6indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemspastel0.8.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspry0.16.0indirect
RubyGemspry-byebug3.12.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemspuma8.0.2indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack2.2.24indirect
RubyGemsrack-test—indirect
RubyGemsrack-test1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0indirect
RubyGemsredis-client0.30.1indirect
RubyGemsreline0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrest-client2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsroo—indirect
RubyGemsroo2.10.1indirect
RubyGemsrouge4.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec—indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.4.1indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.48.0indirect
RubyGemssequel5.42.0indirect
RubyGemssidekiq7.3.10indirect
RubyGemssnaky_hash2.0.7indirect
RubyGemssqlite31.7.3indirect
RubyGemsstrings0.2.1indirect
RubyGemsstrings-ansi0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstilt2.9.0indirect
RubyGemstls_test_kit—indirect
RubyGemstls_test_kit1.0.2indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstty-color0.6.0indirect
RubyGemstty-markdown0.7.2indirect
RubyGemstty-screen0.8.2indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode_utils1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem1.1.15indirect
RubyGemswebmock—indirect
RubyGemswebmock3.26.4indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.11indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 134 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sqlite31.7.3indirectmoderate12.9.5

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with inferno-framework/smart-app-launch-test-kit. Read them side by side →

44SmartHealthNetwork/shn-sdkGo SDK and CLI for Smart Health Network participants: eligibility and Da Vinci prior-authorization exchange over FHIR.Weak87inferno-framework/inferno-coreCore library for the Inferno FrameworkExcellent96medplum/medplumMedplum is a healthcare platform that helps you quickly develop high-quality compliant applications.Exceptional94FirelyTeam/firely-net-sdkThe official Firely .NET SDK for HL7 FHIRExceptional93hapifhir/hapi-fhir🔥 HAPI FHIR - Java API for HL7 FHIR Clients and ServersExceptional91masslight/ottehrModular, Production-Ready, Open-Source EHRExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.