Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 19:56 UTC

intuit / QuickBooks-V3-PHP-SDK

Official PHP SDK for QuickBooks REST API v3.0: https://developer.intuit.com/

PHPApache-2.0★ 284 stars⑂ 280 forkssince Jan 2017View on GitHub ↗

intuit/QuickBooks-V3-PHP-SDK holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IntuitOrganization
558 followers152 public repossince Oct 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistquickbooks/v3-php-sdkV6.2.4409,9956548 days agohttprestapiquickbookssmallbusiness

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
9.4/18Commit volume10 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year10
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases63 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~139.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count63
latest_release_tagv6.2.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases139.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.8/60Stars284 stars
20.4/25Forks280 forks
8.3/15Watchers32 watchers
Inputs used
forks280
stars284
watchers32
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
74.8/80Monthly downloads409,995 downloads/month across packagist
10.4/20Registry dependents35 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesquickbooks/v3-php-sdk
dependents35
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads10,803,904
monthly_downloads409,995
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 53% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth43 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled43
top_contributor_share0.528
How it's scored
29.4/42Issue resolution70% of issues closed
20.7/30PR acceptance105/152 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 11/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs105
open_issues112
closed_issues263
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.701
closed_unmerged_prs47
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
19.8/25Owner reach558 followers of intuit
25/25Track record152 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers558
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginintuit
public_repos152
account_age_days5,031
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 48 days ago
20/20Version history65 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesquickbooks/v3-php-sdk
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish48

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsintegration, quickbooks-online-php-sdk, quickbooks, hacktoberfest, hacktoberfest2020
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno data
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 11/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CII-Best-Practices, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes3/4,780 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes263,767
source_files_sampled4,780
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

284GitHub stars
43contributors
10commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
63releases
1bus factor
112open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 19:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
n/aCII-Best-Practicesinternal error: error during json parsing: error during json.Unmarshal: invalid character '<' looking for beginning of value
8Code-ReviewFound 11/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.9composer.json
All dependencies 34

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 33 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.9.2direct
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.4.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.0.3indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.7.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.11.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-mock/php-mock2.3.1indirect
Packagistphp-mock/php-mock-integration2.1.0indirect
Packagistphp-mock/php-mock-phpunit2.6.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage7.0.15indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator2.0.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer2.1.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-token-stream4.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit8.5.30indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup1.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator3.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment4.2.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter3.1.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator3.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector1.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context3.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/type1.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/version2.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.5.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.