Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-29 14:03 UTC

irihitech / Ursa.Avalonia

Ursa is an enterprise level UI library for building cross-platform applications with Avalonia UI.

C#MIT★ 1,540 stars⑂ 142 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗

irihitech/Ursa.Avalonia holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IRIHI TechnologyOrganization
116 followers31 public repossince Nov 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetIrihi.Ursa2.1.0-2628 days ago
NuGetIrihi.Ursa.Themes.Semi2.1.0-2728 days ago
NuGetIrihi.Ursa.PrismExtension9.0.1-4629 days ago
NuGetIrihi.Ursa.ReactiveUIExtension2.0.0-490 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 251 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year251
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year42
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 42 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 28 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~25.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count42
latest_release_tagv2.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release28
mean_days_between_releases25.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

77Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.7/60Stars — 1,540 stars
17.9/25Forks — 142 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks142
stars1,540
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.4/80Total downloads — 213,994 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesIrihi.Ursa, Irihi.Ursa.Themes.Semi, Irihi.Ursa.PrismExtension, Irihi.Ursa.ReactiveUIExtension
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads213,994
monthly_downloads
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 31 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled31
top_contributor_share0.712
How it's scored
32.8/42Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
28/30PR acceptance — 477/511 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 25/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs477
open_issues99
closed_issues350
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.78
closed_unmerged_prs34
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14.9/25Owner reach — 116 followers of irihitech
18.4/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers116
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginirihitech
public_repos31
account_age_days1,363

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 28 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesIrihi.Ursa, Irihi.Ursa.Themes.Semi, Irihi.Ursa.PrismExtension, Irihi.Ursa.ReactiveUIExtension
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish28

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://irihitech.github.io/Ursa.Avalonia/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsavalonia, avaloniaui, control-library, cross-platform, cross-platform-gui
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://irihitech.github.io/Ursa.Avalonia/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 25/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,242
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — demo/Sandbox/Sandbox.csproj, demo/Ursa.Demo.Android/Ursa.Demo.Android.csproj, demo/Ursa.Demo.Browser/Ursa.Demo.Browser.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 27 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.27
toolchain_manifestsdemo/Sandbox/Sandbox.csproj, demo/Ursa.Demo.Android/Ursa.Demo.Android.csproj, demo/Ursa.Demo.Browser/Ursa.Demo.Browser.csproj, demo/Ursa.Demo.Desktop/Ursa.Demo.Desktop.csproj, demo/Ursa.Demo.iOS/Ursa.Demo.iOS.csproj, demo/Ursa.Demo/Ursa.Demo.csproj, demo/Ursa.PrismDialogDemo/Ursa.PrismDialogDemo.csproj, src/Ursa.PrismExtension/Ursa.PrismExtension.csproj, src/Ursa.ReactiveUIExtension/Ursa.ReactiveUIExtension.csproj, src/Ursa.Themes.Semi/Ursa.Themes.Semi.csproj, src/Ursa/Ursa.csproj, tests/HeadlessTest.Ursa/HeadlessTest.Ursa.csproj, tests/Test.Ursa/Test.Ursa.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/636 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes69,493
source_files_sampled636
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1,540GitHub stars
31contributors
251commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
42releases
1bus factor
99open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 142 ⇿
0Stars
142Forks
42Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014052023-072025-012026-07
Major 2Minor 16Patch 7

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-29 14:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 25/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained29 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetPrism.Coresrc/Ursa.PrismExtension/Ursa.PrismExtension.csproj
NuGetReactiveUI.Avaloniasrc/Ursa.ReactiveUIExtension/Ursa.ReactiveUIExtension.csproj
NuGetAvaloniasrc/Ursa.Themes.Semi/Ursa.Themes.Semi.csproj
NuGetSemi.Avaloniasrc/Ursa.Themes.Semi/Ursa.Themes.Semi.csproj
NuGetAvaloniasrc/Ursa/Ursa.csproj
NuGetIrihi.Avalonia.Sharedsrc/Ursa/Ursa.csproj
NuGetIrihi.Avalonia.Shared.Contractssrc/Ursa/Ursa.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 16 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAvaloniadirect
NuGetIrihi.Avalonia.Shareddirect
NuGetIrihi.Avalonia.Shared.Contractsdirect
NuGetPrism.Coredirect
NuGetReactiveUI.Avaloniadirect
NuGetSemi.Avaloniadirect
NuGetAvalonia.Androidindirect
NuGetAvalonia.Browserindirect
NuGetAvalonia.Desktopindirect
NuGetAvalonia.HarfBuzzindirect
NuGetAvalonia.Headless.XUnitindirect
NuGetAvalonia.iOSindirect
NuGetAvalonia.Skiaindirect
NuGetAvaloniaUI.DiagnosticsSupportindirect
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvmindirect
NuGetIrihi.Linguaindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverageindirect
NuGetPrism.DryIoc.Avaloniaindirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Core.SplashScreenindirect
NuGetxunit.v3indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.runner.msbuildindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.