Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 10:46 UTC

itw-creative-works / backend-manager

Backend manager by ITW Creative Works. Built to optimize Firebase development.

JavaScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverNetwork servicehow this is determined

itw-creative-works/backend-manager holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 44 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ITW Creative WorksOrganization · verified domain
5 followers49 public repossince Apr 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmbackend-manager5.13.02,69491244 days agofirebasefirebase-functionscloud-functionsfirestorebackendserverlessapiexpresscli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 44 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume314 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year314
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push44
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 44 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.13.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release44
mean_days_between_releases3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges10
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.7/80Monthly downloads2,694 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbackend-manager
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,694
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance0/24 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5.6/25Owner reach5 followers of itw-creative-works
24.4/25Track record49 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginitw-creative-works
public_repos49
account_age_days3,092

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 44 days ago
20/20Version history912 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbackend-manager
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://itwcreativeworks.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi, backend, express, firebase, js
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://itwcreativeworks.com
docs_sitehttps://itwcreativeworks.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
3.1/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories9 affected: axios 0.21.4 (high 8.6), form-data 2.3.3 (high 7.5), tar 4.4.19 (high 8.8), +6 more
15.5/40No advisories left outstanding9 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,281 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories45
affected_packages9
assessed_packages679
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 5, moderate 4
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:backend-manager@5.13.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 679 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md, src/defaults/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, src/defaults/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes24,260
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice12 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.12
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/552 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes53,939
source_files_sampled552
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
314commits, last 12 months
44days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 10:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 47
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk^0.3.153package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.99.0package.json
npm@firebase/rules-unit-testing^5.0.1package.json
npm@google-cloud/firestore^7.11.6package.json
npm@google-cloud/pubsub^5.3.1package.json
npm@google-cloud/storage^7.21.0package.json
npm@inquirer/prompts^8.5.2package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0package.json
npm@octokit/rest^22.0.1package.json
npm@resvg/resvg-js^2.6.2package.json
npm@sendgrid/mail^8.1.6package.json
npm@sentry/node^10.54.0package.json
npmbody-parser^2.3.0package.json
npmbusboy^1.6.0package.json
npmchalk^5.6.2package.json
npmcheerio^1.2.0package.json
npmcors^2.8.6package.json
npmdotenv^17.4.2package.json
npmexpress^5.2.1package.json
npmfast-xml-parser^5.9.3package.json
npmfs-jetpack^5.1.0package.json
npmglob^13.0.6package.json
npmhcaptcha^0.2.0package.json
npmitwcw-package-analytics^1.0.8package.json
npmjson5^2.2.3package.json
npmjwt-decode^4.0.0package.json
npmlodash^4.18.1package.json
npmlowdb^7.0.1package.json
npmmailchimp-api-v3^1.15.0package.json
npmmarkdown-it^14.2.0package.json
npmmime-types^3.0.2package.json
npmmjml^5.3.0package.json
npmmoment^2.30.1package.json
npmnanoid^5.1.11package.json
npmnode-powertools^3.0.0package.json
npmnpm-api^1.0.1package.json
npmpushid^1.0.0package.json
npmsanitize-html^2.17.5package.json
npmsharp^0.35.2package.json
npmstripe^22.2.0package.json
npmuid-generator^2.0.0package.json
npmuuid^14.0.1package.json
npmwonderful-fetch^2.0.5package.json
npmwonderful-log^1.0.7package.json
npmwonderful-version^1.3.2package.json
npmyaml^2.9.0package.json
npmyargs^18.0.0package.json
All dependencies 48

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 47 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk^0.3.153direct
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.99.0direct
npm@firebase/rules-unit-testing^5.0.1direct
npm@google-cloud/firestore^7.11.6direct
npm@google-cloud/pubsub^5.3.1direct
npm@google-cloud/storage^7.21.0direct
npm@inquirer/prompts^8.5.2direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0direct
npm@octokit/rest^22.0.1direct
npm@resvg/resvg-js^2.6.2direct
npm@sendgrid/mail^8.1.6direct
npm@sentry/node^10.54.0direct
npmbody-parser^2.3.0direct
npmbusboy^1.6.0direct
npmchalk^5.6.2direct
npmcheerio^1.2.0direct
npmcors^2.8.6direct
npmdotenv^17.4.2direct
npmexpress^5.2.1direct
npmfast-xml-parser^5.9.3direct
npmfs-jetpack^5.1.0direct
npmglob^13.0.6direct
npmhcaptcha^0.2.0direct
npmitwcw-package-analytics^1.0.8direct
npmjson5^2.2.3direct
npmjwt-decode^4.0.0direct
npmlodash^4.18.1direct
npmlowdb^7.0.1direct
npmmailchimp-api-v3^1.15.0direct
npmmarkdown-it^14.2.0direct
npmmime-types^3.0.2direct
npmmjml^5.3.0direct
npmmoment^2.30.1direct
npmnanoid^5.1.11direct
npmnode-powertools^3.0.0direct
npmnpm-api^1.0.1direct
npmpushid^1.0.0direct
npmsanitize-html^2.17.5direct
npmsharp^0.35.2direct
npmstripe^22.2.0direct
npmuid-generator^2.0.0direct
npmuuid^14.0.1direct
npmwonderful-fetch^2.0.5direct
npmwonderful-log^1.0.7direct
npmwonderful-version^1.3.2direct
npmyaml^2.9.0direct
npmyargs^18.0.0direct
npmprepare-package^2.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 9

Installing npm:backend-manager@5.13.0 pulls in 679 packages, direct and transitive: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
axios0.21.4indirecthigh231.18.0
form-data2.3.3indirecthigh24.0.6
tar4.4.19indirecthigh137.5.21
uuid3.4.0indirecthigh113.0.1
uuid9.0.1indirecthigh113.0.1
@opentelemetry/core1.30.1indirectmoderate12.8.0
qs6.5.5indirectmoderate26.16.0
request2.88.2indirectmoderate13.0.0
tough-cookie2.5.0indirectmoderate14.1.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.