Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 08:00 UTC

itw-creative-works / simply-beautiful

Beautify HTML, JS, CSS, and JSON in the browser or in Node.js!

JavaScriptMIT★ 10 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#beautify#beautify-js#beautify-json#pretty-print#pretty#prettify#beautify-css#beautify-html#html#json#css#js#javascript

itw-creative-works/simply-beautiful holds a health index of 42 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (55/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (23/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

42
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

42
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ITW Creative WorksOrganization
5 followers48 public repossince Apr 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmsimply-beautiful1.0.256,0101511 days agobeautifybeautify-jsbeautify-jsonpretty-printprettyprettifybeautify-cssbeautify-htmlhtmljsoncssjsjavascript

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

35Weak
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 11 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume — 2 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push11
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 11 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release11
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

18Critical
How it's scored
15.5/60Stars — 10 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars10
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

79Good
How it's scored
63.3/80Monthly downloads — 56,010 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessimply-beautiful
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads56,010
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

15Critical
How it's scored
8.4/42Issue resolution — 20% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues4
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.2
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

75Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of itw-creative-works
24.3/25Track record — 48 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginitw-creative-works
public_repos48
account_age_days3,047
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessimply-beautiful
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://itwcreativeworks.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbeautify, beautify-js, beautify-json, pretty-print, pretty, prettify, beautify-css, beautify-html, html, json, css, js, javascript
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://itwcreativeworks.com
docs_sitehttps://itwcreativeworks.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

20At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

79Good
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
10/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: uuid 9.0.1 (high 7.5)
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 104 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages23
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:simply-beautiful@1.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 23 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

23At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

4Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
4/40Legible commit history — 2 of 27 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.074
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

36Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 27
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

28At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
27.5/55Manageable file sizes — 1/2 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes74,783
source_files_sampled2
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

10GitHub stars
1contributors
2commits, last 12 months
11days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312020-092021-062022-03

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.0 / 10
2.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 08:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmitwcw-package-analytics^1.0.8package.json
All dependencies 135

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 134 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmitwcw-package-analytics1.0.8direct
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.2indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdiff7.0.0indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmfs-jetpack4.3.1indirect
npmfs-jetpack5.1.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.0indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch5.1.9indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmocha11.7.6indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmprepare-package2.1.0indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmreaddirp5.0.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrimraf2.7.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmuuid9.0.1indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwonderful-fetch1.3.4indirect
npmwonderful-fetch2.0.5indirect
npmworkerpool9.3.4indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.3indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing npm:simply-beautiful@1.0.2 pulls in 23 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
uuid9.0.1indirecthigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with itw-creative-works/simply-beautiful. Read them side by side →

100carbon-design-system/carbonA design system built by IBMExceptional98prettier/prettierPrettier is an opinionated code formatter.Exceptional99electron/electron:electron: Build cross-platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSSExceptional97biomejs/biomeA toolchain for web projects, aimed to provide functionalities to maintain them. Biome offers formatter and linter, usable via CLI and LSP.Exceptional96surveyjs/survey-libraryOpen-source JavaScript form library for React, Angular, Vue, and plain JavaScript. Render dynamic JSON-driven forms, multi-step form wizards, surveys, quizzes, and other data-entry tools.Exceptional100supabase/supabase-jsAn isomorphic Javascript client for Supabase. Query your Supabase database, subscribe to realtime events, upload and download files, browse typescript examples, invoke postgres functions via rpc, invoke supabase edge functions, query pgvector.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.