Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 01:16 UTC

jacksleight / statamic-bard-texstyle

This Statamic addon allows you to add custom element styles to the Bard fieldtype and edit element attributes.

PHP · JavaScript · VueCustom license★ 19 stars⑂ 1 forksince Nov 2021View on GitHub ↗

jacksleight/statamic-bard-texstyle holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (34/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jack SleightPersonal account
114 followers60 public repossince Sep 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistjacksleight/statamic-bard-texstyle4.2.26,395491 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18Commit volume33 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained11 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year33
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases49 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~26.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count49
latest_release_tag4.2.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases26.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.4/60Stars19 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars19
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
50.7/80Monthly downloads6,395 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesjacksleight/statamic-bard-texstyle
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads215,873
monthly_downloads6,395
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.993
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution94% of issues closed
26.5/30PR acceptance45/51 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs45
open_issues3
closed_issues50
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.943
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.8/25Owner reach114 followers of jacksleight
25/25Track record60 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers114
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjacksleight
public_repos60
account_age_days6,211
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history49 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjacksleight/statamic-bard-texstyle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://statamic.com/addons/jacksleight/bard-texstyle
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://statamic.com/addons/jacksleight/bard-texstyle
docs_sitehttps://statamic.com/addons/jacksleight/bard-texstyle
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained11 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories32
affected_packages7
assessed_packages82
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 6
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 82 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://statamic.com/llms.txt)
7.5/40Legible commit history14 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://statamic.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.14
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes18,360
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

19GitHub stars
3contributors
33commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
49releases
1bus factor
3open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 01:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagiststatamic/cms^6.0composer.json
All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 86 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagiststatamic/cmsdirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/parser7.28.4indirect
npm@babel/types7.28.4indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.30indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-beta.29indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.48.1indirect
npm@statamic/cms0.0.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.1.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/vite4.1.12indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.1indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.21indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.21indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmcsstype3.1.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.0.4indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.18.3indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmesbuild0.25.9indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmjiti2.5.1indirect
npmlaravel-vite-plugin2.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.30.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.18indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmminizlib3.0.2indirect
npmmkdirp3.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.3indirect
npmpostcss8.5.6indirect
npmrollup4.48.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.1.12indirect
npmtapable2.2.3indirect
npmtar7.4.3indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.14indirect
npmvite7.1.3indirect
npmvite-plugin-full-reload1.2.0indirect
npmvue3.5.21indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collisionindirect
Packagistorchestra/testbenchindirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 82 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rollup4.48.1indirectcritical14.59.0
nanoid3.3.11indirecthigh35.1.16
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
picomatch4.0.3indirecthigh24.0.4
postcss8.5.6indirecthigh48.5.23
tar7.4.3indirecthigh127.5.21
vite7.1.3indirecthigh88.0.16

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.