Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 11:48 UTC

jaegertracing / jaeger-ui

Web UI for Jaeger

TypeScript · JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 1,528 stars⑂ 838 forkssince Feb 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

jaegertracing/jaeger-ui holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (77/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jaeger - Distributed Tracing PlatformOrganization · verified domain
596 followers37 public repossince May 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 714 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year714
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 76 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~27 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count76
latest_release_tagv2.20.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases27

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.6/60Stars — 1,528 stars
24.4/25Forks — 838 forks
15/15Watchers — 1,005 watchers
Inputs used
forks838
stars1,528
watchers1,005
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesapi.securityscorecards.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 19% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 30 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.192
How it's scored
36.3/42Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
19/30PR acceptance — 2,190/3,458 decided PRs merged
6/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 6/13 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs2,190
open_issues120
closed_issues768
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d14
prs_merged_30d37
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.865
closed_unmerged_prs1,268
first_time_authors_30d11
first_time_prs_merged_30d6
first_time_prs_decided_30d13
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
20/25Owner reach — 596 followers of jaegertracing
23.5/25Track record — 37 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers596
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginjaegertracing
public_repos37
account_age_days3,415

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 11 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://jaegertracing.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopentracing, distributed-tracing, jaeger, sre, trace, apm, tracing, monitoring, site-reliability-engineering, javascript, react, reactjs, typescript, ui, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttp://jaegertracing.io/
docs_sitehttp://jaegertracing.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages75
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 75 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

87Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,740
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — packages/jaeger-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plexus/tsconfig.json, scripts/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 13 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspackages/jaeger-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plexus/tsconfig.json, scripts/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.13
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/718 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes44,915
source_files_sampled718
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,528GitHub stars
98contributors
714commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
76releases
3bus factor
120open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 30 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 838 ⇿
0Stars
838Forks
76Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02004006008001,000826232017-052022-012026-09
Major 1Minor 66Patch 9

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 11:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 57
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@tanstack/react-virtual3.14.2package.json
npmreact-side-effect2.1.2package.json
npm@ag-ui/client0.0.54packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@assistant-ui/react0.15.2packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@assistant-ui/react-ag-ui0.0.35packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@jaegertracing/plexusworkspace:*packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/api1.9.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http0.221.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation0.221.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-document-load0.66.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-fetch0.221.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/resources2.10.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base2.10.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-web2.10.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions1.43.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@rc-component/overflow^1.0.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.90.19packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-virtual3.14.2packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmantd6.6.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmchance1.1.13packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmclassnames2.5.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmcombokeys3.0.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmcopy-to-clipboard4.0.2packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmd3-flame-graph^5.0.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmd3-selection^3.0.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmdayjs1.11.19packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmdeep-freeze0.0.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmdrange2.0.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmlodash4.18.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmlogfmt1.4.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmlru-memoize1.1.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmmarkdown-to-jsx9.10.2packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmmatch-sorter8.3.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmmemoize-one6.0.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmobject-hash3.0.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmquery-string9.5.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact19.2.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact-circular-progressbar2.2.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact-icons5.7.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact-is19.2.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact-json-view-lite2.5.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact-redux9.3.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmreact-router-dom7.18.2packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmrecharts3.10.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmredux5.0.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmredux-actions3.0.3packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmredux-promise-middleware6.2.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmtween-functions1.2.0packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmu-basscss2.0.1packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmzod4.5.4packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.12packages/jaeger-ui/package.json
npm@viz-js/viz3.29.0packages/plexus/package.json
npmd3-selection3.0.0packages/plexus/package.json
npmd3-zoom3.0.0packages/plexus/package.json
npmmemoize-one6.0.0packages/plexus/package.json
npmreact-icons5.7.0packages/plexus/package.json
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 52 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@ag-ui/client0.0.54direct
npm@assistant-ui/react0.15.2direct
npm@assistant-ui/react-ag-ui0.0.35direct
npm@opentelemetry/api1.9.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http0.221.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation0.221.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-document-load0.66.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-fetch0.221.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/resources2.10.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base2.10.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-web2.10.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions1.43.0direct
npm@rc-component/overflow^1.0.1direct
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.90.19direct
npm@tanstack/react-virtual3.14.2direct
npm@viz-js/viz3.29.0direct
npmantd6.6.1direct
npmchance1.1.13direct
npmclassnames2.5.1direct
npmcombokeys3.0.1direct
npmcopy-to-clipboard4.0.2direct
npmd3-flame-graph^5.0.0direct
npmd3-selection3.0.0direct
npmd3-selection^3.0.0direct
npmd3-zoom3.0.0direct
npmdayjs1.11.19direct
npmdeep-freeze0.0.1direct
npmdrange2.0.1direct
npmlodash4.18.1direct
npmlogfmt1.4.0direct
npmlru-memoize1.1.0direct
npmmarkdown-to-jsx9.10.2direct
npmmatch-sorter8.3.0direct
npmmemoize-one6.0.0direct
npmobject-hash3.0.0direct
npmquery-string9.5.0direct
npmreact19.2.0direct
npmreact-circular-progressbar2.2.0direct
npmreact-dom19.2.0direct
npmreact-icons5.7.0direct
npmreact-is19.2.0direct
npmreact-json-view-lite2.5.0direct
npmreact-redux9.3.0direct
npmreact-router-dom7.18.2direct
npmrecharts3.10.0direct
npmredux5.0.1direct
npmredux-actions3.0.3direct
npmredux-promise-middleware6.2.0direct
npmtween-functions1.2.0direct
npmu-basscss2.0.1direct
npmzod4.5.4direct
npmzustand^5.0.12direct
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm6412.1.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-x6412.1.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm6412.1.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl12.1.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x6412.1.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl12.1.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-arm6412.1.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-x6412.1.0indirect
npm@testing-library/jest-dom7.0.0indirect
npm@testing-library/react16.3.0indirect
npm@testing-library/react^16.3.1indirect
npm@testing-library/user-event14.6.1indirect
npm@types/d3-selection^3.0.11indirect
npm@types/d3-zoom3.0.8indirect
npm@types/deep-freeze0.1.5indirect
npm@types/lodash4.17.21indirect
npm@types/node24.13.1indirect
npm@types/object-hash3.0.6indirect
npm@types/react19.2.7indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.3indirect
npm@types/redux-actions2.6.5indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.1.0indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v85.0.0indirect
npmbabel-plugin-react-remove-properties0.3.1indirect
npmidentity-obj-proxy3.0.0indirect
npmless4.9.0indirect
npmpnpm12.1.0indirect
npmterser5.51.2indirect
npmvite8.2.0indirect
npmvitest5.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 75 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.