Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-12 22:11 UTC

jakearchibald / idb

IndexedDB, but with promises

TypeScriptISC★ 7,393 stars⑂ 382 forkssince Aug 2015View on GitHub ↗

jakearchibald/idb holds a health index of 28 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (79/100) and lowest on Vitality (17/100). It was last updated 462 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jake ArchibaldPersonal account

11,595 followers258 public repossince Jun 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	idb	8.0.3	92,161,594	64	462 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

17Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 472 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredissues left unansweredOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 462 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	0.99
days_since_last_push	462
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

40Weak

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 45 version tags (no GitHub releases)
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 462 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~142.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	45
latest_release_tag	v8.0.3
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	462
mean_days_between_releases	142.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

91Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 7,393 stars
21.5/25	Forks — 382 forks
9.9/15	Watchers — 61 watchers

Inputs used

forks	382
stars	7,393
watchers	61
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (ISC)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 92,161,594 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	idb
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	92,161,594
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 30 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	30
top_contributor_share	0.803

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

34.6/42	Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
19.3/30	PR acceptance — 49/76 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	49
open_issues	46
closed_issues	215
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.824
closed_unmerged_prs	27
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

75Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25	Owner reach — 11,595 followers of jakearchibald
25/25	Track record — 258 public repos, account ~17 yr old

Inputs used

followers	11,595
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	jakearchibald
public_repos	258
account_age_days	6,273

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 462 days ago
20/20	Version history — 64 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	idb
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	462

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.npmjs.com/package/idb
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://www.npmjs.com/package/idb
docs_site	https://www.npmjs.com/package/idb
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

30At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	28
affected_packages	12
assessed_packages	183
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 10, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 183 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.9/40	Legible commit history — 37 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.374
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — src/tsconfig.json, test/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	src/tsconfig.json, test/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

96Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
51.3/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/15 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	61,797
source_files_sampled	15
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

7,393GitHub stars

30contributors

0commits, last 12 months

462days since last push

45releases

1bus factor

46open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 382 ⇿

0Stars

382Forks

45Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 6Minor 3Patch 33

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10

3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-12 22:10 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	19 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 183

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 183 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.8`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/set-array	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.6`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.25`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-commonjs	`28.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-node-resolve	`16.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-terser	`0.4.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-typescript	`12.1.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/pluginutils	`5.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loongarch64-gnu	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	@sindresorhus/merge-streams	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	@types/mocha	`10.0.10`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`22.15.14`	indirect
npm	@types/resolve	`1.20.2`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.14.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	browser-stdout	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	chai	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	check-error	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	commondir	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	conditional-type-checks	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	cross-env	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	del	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	diff	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.19.1`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.4.4`	indirect
npm	filesize	`10.1.6`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.4.5`	indirect
npm	glob	`11.0.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	globby	`14.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`7.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-module	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-cwd	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-reference	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-unicode-supported	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	log-symbols	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	loupe	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.1.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.17`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`5.1.6`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	mocha	`11.2.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-map	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-type	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	pathval	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.5.3`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	randombytes	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.10`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.40.2`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	serialize-javascript	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	slash	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	smob	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.39.0`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.8.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	unicorn-magic	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	workerpool	`6.5.1`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yargs-unparser	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 183 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`4.40.2`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect	high	5	`5.0.9`
glob	`10.4.5`	indirect	high	1	`11.1.0`
glob	`11.0.2`	indirect	high	1	`11.1.0`
js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect	high	4	`4.3.1`
minimatch	`10.0.1`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`5.1.6`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`9.0.5`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
picomatch	`4.0.2`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
serialize-javascript	`6.0.2`	indirect	high	2	`7.0.5`
diff	`5.2.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records