Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 11:10 UTC

jasonmunro / cypht

Cypht: Lightweight Open Source webmail aggregator [PHP, JS]. Supports IMAP/SMTP, JMAP and EWS (Exchange Web Services)

PHP · JavaScriptLGPL-2.1★ 1,633 stars⑂ 222 forkssince Feb 2014View on GitHub ↗
#php#webmail#webmail-client#imap#pop3#smtp#news-reader#rss#atom#e-mail#jmap#ews

jasonmunro/cypht holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Cypht Webmail communityOrganization
44 followers6 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,102 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,102
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 43 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count43
latest_release_tagv2.11.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases28.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

80Excellent
How it's scored
52.1/60Stars — 1,633 stars
19.5/25Forks — 222 forks
8.3/15Watchers — 32 watchers
Inputs used
forks222
stars1,633
watchers32
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (LGPL-2.1)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

41Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 61% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 93 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 39 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled93
top_contributor_share0.613

Issue & PR responsiveness

85Excellent
How it's scored
35.8/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance — 1,152/1,253 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs1,152
open_issues112
closed_issues646
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.852
closed_unmerged_prs101
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
11.9/25Owner reach — 44 followers of cypht-org
12.3/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers44
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logincypht-org
public_repos6
account_age_days1,115
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://cypht.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, webmail, webmail-client, imap, pop3, smtp, news-reader, rss, atom, e-mail, jmap, ews
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://cypht.org
docs_sitehttp://cypht.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 39 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
52.9/55Manageable file sizes — 14/362 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes588,085
source_files_sampled362
oversized_source_files14

Key facts

1,633GitHub stars
93contributors
1,102commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
43releases
1bus factor
112open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch packagist package 'cypht-org/cypht' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 11:09 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbacon/bacon-qr-code^3.0.0composer.json
Packagistchristian-riesen/base32^1.3.2composer.json
Packagistezyang/htmlpurifier^4.17composer.json
Packagistgarethp/php-ews>=0.11.2composer.json
Packagisthenrique-borba/php-sieve-manager^1.0composer.json
Packagistleague/commonmark^2.8composer.json
Packagistmonolog/monolog^3.0composer.json
Packagistsentry/sdk^4.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dotenv^6.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^6.4.40composer.json
Packagistthomaspark/bootswatch^5.3composer.json
Packagisttwbs/bootstrap^5.3composer.json
Packagisttwbs/bootstrap-icons^1.11composer.json
Packagistwebklex/composer-info^0.0.1composer.json
Packagistzbateson/mail-mime-parser^3.0composer.json
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 69 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbacon/bacon-qr-code3.0.4direct
Packagistchristian-riesen/base321.6.0direct
Packagistezyang/htmlpurifier4.19.0direct
Packagistgarethp/php-ews0.11.2direct
Packagisthenrique-borba/php-sieve-manager1.0.10direct
Packagistleague/commonmark2.8.2direct
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.10.0direct
Packagistsentry/sdk4.0.0direct
Packagistsymfony/dotenv6.4.35direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml6.4.40direct
Packagistthomaspark/bootswatch5.3.8direct
Packagisttwbs/bootstrap5.3.8direct
Packagisttwbs/bootstrap-icons1.13.1direct
Packagistwebklex/composer-info0.0.1direct
Packagistzbateson/mail-mime-parser3.0.5direct
Packagistdasprid/enum1.0.7indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistgarethp/http-playback2.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.12.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.12.1indirect
Packagistjean85/pretty-package-versions2.1.1indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-code4.16.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure2.0.10indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.5indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.0.10indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-di/invoker2.3.7indirect
Packagistphp-di/php-di7.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit10.5.63indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistsentry/sentry4.23.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver6.4.30indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Packagistzbateson/mb-wrapper2.0.1indirect
Packagistzbateson/stream-decorators2.1.1indirect
PyPIattrs23.1.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.7.4indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIoutcome1.2.0indirect
PyPIpysocks1.7.1indirect
PyPIselenium4.14.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPItrio0.22.2indirect
PyPItrio-websocket0.11.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwsproto1.2.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with jasonmunro/cypht. Read them side by side →

88cypht-org/cyphtCypht: Lightweight Open Source webmail aggregator [PHP, JS]. Supports IMAP/SMTP, JMAP and EWS (Exchange Web Services)Excellent95nextcloud/mail💌 Mail app for NextcloudExceptional88stalwartlabs/stalwartAll-in-one Mail & Collaboration server. Secure, scalable and fluent in every protocol (IMAP, JMAP, SMTP, CalDAV, CardDAV, WebDAV).Excellent94chatmail/coreChatmail Rust Core library, used by Android/iOS/desktop chatmail apps, bindings and bots 📧 Exceptional91greenmail-mail-test/greenmailOfficial master for the Greenmail projectExcellent88PHPMailer/PHPMailerThe classic email sending library for PHPExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.