Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.7.0 · 2026-08-19 15:29 UTC

jawah / urllib3.future

Inplace replacement for urllib3 capable of async with automatic HTTP/1, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 transport.

PythonMIT★ 68 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Jul 2023forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#http2#http3#multiplexed#quic#streams#urllib3#dns#dns-over-https#dns-over-quic#dns-over-tls#dns-over-udp#dnssec#doh#doq#dot#async#asyncio#websocket#wasi

jawah/urllib3.future holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JawahOrganization
40 followers10 public repossince Jul 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIurllib3-future2.24.9012,000,3681663 days agoasyncconcurrentdnsdns-over-httpsdns-over-quicdns-over-tlsdohdoqdotdoufileposthttphttplibhttpsmultiplexedpoolingssltasksafethreadsafeurllibwasiwasm

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
26.3/36Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 521 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year521
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year38

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.6 days
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag2.24.901
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases9.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

41Weak
How it's scored
29.6/60Stars — 68 stars
9.6/25Forks — 15 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars68
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 2,000,368 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesurllib3-future
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,000,368
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

76Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 101 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.257

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
23.9/30PR acceptance — 270/339 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs270
open_issues3
closed_issues50
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.943
closed_unmerged_prs69
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.6/25Owner reach — 40 followers of jawah
13.8/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers40
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginjawah
public_repos10
account_age_days1,136

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 166 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesurllib3-future
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://urllib3future.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshttp2, http3, multiplexed, quic, streams, urllib3, dns, dns-over-https, dns-over-quic, dns-over-tls, dns-over-udp, dnssec, doh, doq, dot, async, asyncio, websocket, wasi
has_wikino
homepagehttps://urllib3future.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
docs_sitehttps://urllib3future.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

73Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 101 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
7.5/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:urllib3-future@2.24.901 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

85Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile, noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — src/urllib3/contrib/hface/py.typed, src/urllib3/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile, noxfile.py
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/urllib3/contrib/hface/py.typed, src/urllib3/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/urllib3/contrib/hface/py.typed, src/urllib3/py.typed)
53.6/55Manageable file sizes — 6/229 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes108,667
source_files_sampled229
oversized_source_files6

Key facts

68GitHub stars
99contributors
521commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
3open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿
0Stars
15Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151522024-082025-082026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 100

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10
7.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-19 15:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 101 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
10Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIqh3>=1.5.4,<2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIh11>=0.11.0,<1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjh2>=5.0.3,<6.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 83 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIh110.14.0direct
PyPIh110.16.0direct
PyPIjh25.0.13direct
PyPIqh31.9.4direct
PyPIaiofile3.11.1indirect
PyPIaiofile3.8.8indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.7.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIbrotli—indirect
PyPIbrotlicffi—indirect
PyPIcaio0.9.24indirect
PyPIcffi1.17.1indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.10.1indirect
PyPIcomponentize-py0.25.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.1indirect
PyPIcoverage7.2.7indirect
PyPIcoverage7.6.1indirect
PyPIcryptography—indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.7indirect
PyPIdependency-groups1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.16.1indirect
PyPIfuro—indirect
PyPIhatchling—indirect
PyPIhumanize4.10.0indirect
PyPIidna3.10indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.5.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.4.5indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImypy1.14.1indirect
PyPImypy1.4.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInox2024.4.15indirect
PyPInox2026.2.9indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpytest7.4.4indirect
PyPIpytest8.3.5indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio0.21.2indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio0.24.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov4.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov5.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures13.0indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures14.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.5.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.6.1indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.4indirect
PyPIpython-socks2.8.1indirect
PyPIrequests—indirect
PyPIrtls2026.7.25indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton—indirect
PyPIsphinxext-opengraph—indirect
PyPItornado6.2indirect
PyPItornado6.4.2indirect
PyPItornado6.5.5indirect
PyPItowncrier23.6.0indirect
PyPItowncrier24.8.0indirect
PyPItrustme1.0.0indirect
PyPItrustme1.1.0indirect
PyPItrustme1.2.1indirect
PyPItypes-backports0.1.3indirect
PyPItypes-pysocks1.7.1.20251001indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.13.2indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPIutls2026.7.8indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.4.3indirect
PyPIwassima2.1.3indirect
PyPIwsproto1.3.2indirect
PyPIzipp3.20.2indirect
PyPIzstandard0.21.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:urllib3-future@2.24.901 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with jawah/urllib3.future. Read them side by side →

98urllib3/urllib3urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for PythonExceptional93ozeranskii/httptapRich-powered CLI that breaks each HTTP request into DNS, connect, TLS, wait, and transfer phases with waterfall timelines, compact summaries, or metrics-only output.Exceptional94jetty/jetty.projectEclipse Jetty® - Web Container & Clients - supports HTTP/3, HTTP/2, HTTP/1, websocket, servlets, and moreExceptional92semihalev/sdnsA high-performance, recursive DNS resolver server with DNSSEC support, focused on preserving privacy.Excellent97twisted/twistedEvent-driven networking engine written in Python.Exceptional96mitmproxy/mitmproxyAn interactive TLS-capable intercepting HTTP proxy for penetration testers and software developers.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.7.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.