Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-06 22:42 UTC

jeffersongoncalves / filament-ace-editor-field

A Laravel Filament field that integrates the Ace code editor into your forms, offering a rich, syntax-highlighted code editing experience with configurable modes and themes.

PHP · JavaScript · BladeMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2025View on GitHub ↗

jeffersongoncalves/filament-ace-editor-field holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jefferson GonçalvesPersonal account
5,405 followers271 public repossince Sep 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistjeffersongoncalves/filament-ace-editor-field2.1.02,2101214 days agolaravelace-editorfilamentjeffersongoncalvesfilament-ace-editor-field

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
17/18Commit volume — 77 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year77
human_commit_share0.832
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 12 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 14 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~44.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tag2.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases44.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.6/80Monthly downloads — 2,210 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesjeffersongoncalves/filament-ace-editor-field
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads11,796
monthly_downloads2,210
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
29.4/30PR acceptance — 47/48 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs47
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d12
prs_decided_30d12
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach — 5,405 followers of jeffersongoncalves
25/25Track record — 271 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,405
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjeffersongoncalves
public_repos271
account_age_days5,858
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjeffersongoncalves/filament-ace-editor-field
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsace-editor, editor, filament, filament-field, filament-form, filament-plugin, laravel
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages122
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 122 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 61 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.772
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 26 of the last 95 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 16 of the last 95 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.274
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.168
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes5,722
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
1contributors
77commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-06 22:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests7 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistfilament/filament^5.3composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools^1.14.0composer.json
All dependencies 129

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 127 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfilament/filament—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools—direct
npm@colordx/core7.3.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.2indirect
npm@csstools/selector-resolve-nested4.0.2indirect
npm@csstools/selector-specificity6.0.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npmansi-regex6.4.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.11.27indirect
npmboolbase1.0.0indirect
npmbrowserslist4.29.3indirect
npmcaniuse-api4.0.0indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001814indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcliui9.0.1indirect
npmcommander11.1.0indirect
npmcss-select6.0.0indirect
npmcss-tree2.2.1indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmcss-what7.0.0indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmcssnano9.3.2indirect
npmcssnano-preset-default9.3.2indirect
npmcssnano-utils8.2.0indirect
npmcsso5.0.5indirect
npmdependency-graph1.0.0indirect
npmdom-serializer2.0.0indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler5.0.3indirect
npmdomutils3.2.2indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.444indirect
npmemoji-regex10.6.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.7.0indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.3indirect
npmmdn-data2.0.28indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.20indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.57indirect
npmnth-check2.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.29indirect
npmpostcss-calc11.2.2indirect
npmpostcss-cli12.0.0indirect
npmpostcss-colormin9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-convert-values9.0.7indirect
npmpostcss-discard-comments9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-discard-duplicates9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-discard-empty9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-discard-overridden9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-load-config6.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-merge-longhand9.2.1indirect
npmpostcss-merge-rules9.1.2indirect
npmpostcss-minify-font-values9.0.7indirect
npmpostcss-minify-gradients9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-minify-params9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-minify-selectors9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-nesting14.0.3indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-charset9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-display-values9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-positions9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-repeat-style9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-string9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-timing-functions9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-unicode9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-url9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-whitespace9.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-ordered-values9.0.7indirect
npmpostcss-reduce-initial9.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-reduce-transforms9.0.4indirect
npmpostcss-reporter7.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser7.1.6indirect
npmpostcss-svgo9.0.4indirect
npmpostcss-unique-selectors9.0.5indirect
npmpretty-hrtime1.0.3indirect
npmread-cache1.0.2indirect
npmreaddirp5.1.1indirect
npmsax1.6.1indirect
npmslash5.1.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.2indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstring-width8.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstylehacks9.0.7indirect
npmsvgo4.1.0indirect
npmthenby1.4.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.3.3indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi9.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs18.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser22.0.0indirect
Packagistlarastan/larastan—indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint—indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 122 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.