Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 23:23 UTC

jeroennoten / Laravel-AdminLTE

Easy AdminLTE integration with Laravel

PHP · BladeMIT★ 4,000 stars⑂ 1,089 forkssince Jun 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

jeroennoten/Laravel-AdminLTE holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (85/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated 12 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jeroen NotenPersonal account
434 followers108 public repossince May 2013iO

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistjeroennoten/laravel-adminltev4.0.0118,26212312 days agoadminlaraveldashboardbladeadministratoradminltebootstrap5

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 12 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
12.4/18Commit volume — 23 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year23
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push12
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 12 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~66.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release12
mean_days_between_releases66.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

85Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
58.4/60Stars — 4,000 stars
25/25Forks — 1,089 forks
11.6/15Watchers — 124 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,089
stars4,000
watchers124
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
67.6/80Monthly downloads — 118,262 downloads/month across packagist
12/20Registry dependents — 63 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesjeroennoten/laravel-adminlte
dependents63
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads5,336,208
monthly_downloads118,262
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 29% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.288
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance — 424/494 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs424
open_issues0
closed_issues884
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d12
prs_decided_30d12
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs70
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19/25Owner reach — 434 followers of jeroennoten
25/25Track record — 108 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers434
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjeroennoten
public_repos108
account_age_days4,878
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 12 days ago
20/20Version history — 123 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjeroennoten/laravel-adminlte
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish12

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

83Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://jeroennoten.github.io/Laravel-AdminLTE
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, adminlte
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://jeroennoten.github.io/Laravel-AdminLTE
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages135
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 135 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 74 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.796
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/358 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes87,226
source_files_sampled358
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

4,000GitHub stars
99contributors
23commits, last 12 months
12days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,089 ⇿
0Stars
1,089Forks
75Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

02004006008001,0001,2001,089102017-092022-022026-08
Major 2Minor 23Patch 48

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 23:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 5/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistlaravel/framework^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistalmasaeed2010/adminlte^4.9composer.json
All dependencies 140

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistalmasaeed2010/adminlte—direct
Packagistlaravel/framework—direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.8indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@docsearch/css4.7.0indirect
npm@docsearch/js4.7.0indirect
npm@docsearch/sidepanel-js4.7.0indirect
npm@fontsource/source-sans-35.3.0indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.94indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.148.0indirect
npm@popperjs/core2.11.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@shikijs/core4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/langs4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/primitive4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/themes4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/types4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.5indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.4.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.8indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api8.2.1indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit8.2.1indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared8.2.1indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.42indirect
npm@vueuse/core14.4.0indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations14.4.0indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata14.4.0indirect
npm@vueuse/shared14.4.0indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmbootstrap5.3.8indirect
npmbootstrap-icons1.13.1indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfocus-trap8.2.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmoniguruma-parser0.12.2indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es4.3.6indirect
npmoverlayscrollbars2.16.0indirect
npmperfect-debounce2.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmproperty-information7.2.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.7indirect
npmshiki4.4.3indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmtabbable6.5.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmvitepress2.0.0-alpha.19indirect
npmvue3.5.42indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 135 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.