Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 05:54 UTC

jhedstrom / drupalextension

An integration layer between Behat, Mink Extension, and Drupal.

PHP · GherkinGPL-2.0★ 211 stars⑂ 192 forkssince Nov 2012View on GitHub ↗

jhedstrom/drupalextension holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated 30 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jonathan HedstromPersonal account
84 followers83 public repossince Apr 2009Phase2

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistdrupal/drupal-extensionv6.1.0177,8947230 days agotestwebdrupal

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 30 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume153 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year153
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push30
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases52 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 30 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~10.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count52
latest_release_tagv6.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases10.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
37.7/60Stars211 stars
19/25Forks192 forks
7.6/15Watchers24 watchers
Inputs used
forks192
stars211
watchers24
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
70/80Monthly downloads177,894 downloads/month across packagist
15.2/20Registry dependents192 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdrupal/drupal-extension
dependents192
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads15,783,330
monthly_downloads177,894
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth81 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled81
top_contributor_share0.572
How it's scored
41.9/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
23.4/30PR acceptance407/521 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs407
open_issues1
closed_issues356
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.997
closed_unmerged_prs114
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.9/25Owner reach84 followers of jhedstrom
25/25Track record83 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers84
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjhedstrom
public_repos83
account_age_days6,299
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history72 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdrupal/drupal-extension
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdrupal, behat, behat-extension, php
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.2/40Legible commit history66 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.66
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
54.6/55Manageable file sizes1/139 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes64,125
source_files_sampled139
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

211GitHub stars
81contributors
153commits, last 12 months
30days since last push
52releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 211 ★ / 192 ⇿
211Stars
192Forks
51Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024021018672013-032019-102026-06
Major 3Minor 10Patch 26

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 05:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbehat/behat^3.22composer.json
Packagistbehat/gherkin^4.13composer.json
Packagistbehat/mink^1.12composer.json
Packagistbehat/mink-browserkit-driver^2.1.0composer.json
Packagistdrupal/drupal-driver^3.2composer.json
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-extension^2.7.1composer.json
Packagistlullabot/mink-selenium2-driver^1.7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/css-selector^6.4.3 || ^7composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler^6.4.3 || ^7composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client^6.4.3 || ^7composer.json
Packagistwebflo/drupal-finder^1.3.1composer.json
All dependencies 52

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 41 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbehat/behatdirect
Packagistbehat/gherkindirect
Packagistbehat/minkdirect
Packagistbehat/mink-browserkit-driverdirect
Packagistdrupal/drupal-driverdirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-extensiondirect
Packagistlullabot/mink-selenium2-driverdirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selectordirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawlerdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-clientdirect
Packagistwebflo/drupal-finderdirect
Packagistcomposer/installersindirect
Packagistdantleech/gherkin-lintindirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-dataindirect
Packagistdrevops/behat-phpserverindirect
Packagistdrevops/behat-screenshotindirect
Packagistdrevops/phpcs-standardindirect
Packagistdrupal/coderindirect
Packagistdrupal/color_fieldindirect
Packagistdrupal/coreindirect
Packagistdrupal/core-composer-scaffoldindirect
Packagistdrush/drushindirect
Packagistdvdoug/behat-code-coverageindirect
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalizeindirect
Packagistgrasmash/yaml-cliindirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzleindirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promisesindirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schemaindirect
Packagistleague/containerindirect
Packagistmasterminds/html5indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lintindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverageindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistrector/rectorindirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kitindirect
Packagistsymfony/configindirect
Packagistsymfony/consoleindirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injectionindirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcherindirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contractsindirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystemindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernelindirect
Packagistsymfony/mimeindirect
Packagistsymfony/routingindirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contractsindirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumperindirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporterindirect
Packagistsymfony/yamlindirect
Packagistwebmozart/assertindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.