Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 05:05 UTC

jneem / imbl

Blazing fast immutable collection datatypes for Rust.

RustMPL-2.0★ 172 stars⑂ 33 forkssince Aug 2021View on GitHub ↗

jneem/imbl holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (68/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

jneemPersonal account
114 followers177 public repossince Feb 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioimbl7.0.1587,854140 days agob-treehamtimmutablepersistentrrb-treedata-structures

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

52Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
9/36Commit cadence13/52 weeks with commits
12.7/18Commit volume25 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year25
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases3 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 997 days ago
5.4/27Release cadencea release every ~402.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv2.0.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release997
mean_days_between_releases402.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.2/60Stars172 stars
12.5/25Forks33 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks33
stars172
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
76.9/80Monthly downloads587,854 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesimbl
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads3,661,748
monthly_downloads587,854
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 65% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth56 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled56
top_contributor_share0.649
How it's scored
29/42Issue resolution69% of issues closed
27.4/30PR acceptance105/115 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 19/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs105
open_issues13
closed_issues29
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.69
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.8/25Owner reach114 followers of jneem
25/25Track record177 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers114
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjneem
public_repos177
account_age_days5,265
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesimbl
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests26 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/imbl
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/imbl
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests26 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 19/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
50.8/55Manageable file sizes3/39 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes95,010
source_files_sampled39
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

172GitHub stars
56contributors
25commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
13open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'im-fuzz' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 05:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests26 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 19/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained3 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobitmaps3Cargo.toml
crates.ioimbl-sized-chunks0.1.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorand_core0.9Cargo.toml
crates.iorand_xoshiro0.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioarchery1.2.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioquickcheck1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioproptest1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_core1.0.224Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1Cargo.toml
crates.ioarbitrary1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobincode2.0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iowide0.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iolibfuzzer-sys0.4fuzz/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarbitrary1fuzz/Cargo.toml
crates.ioimblfuzz/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 133

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 117 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioarbitrarydirect
crates.ioarbitrary1.4.2direct
crates.ioarchery1.2.1direct
crates.iobincode2.0.1direct
crates.iobitmaps3.2.1direct
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2direct
crates.ioimbl-sized-chunks0.1.3direct
crates.iolibfuzzer-sysdirect
crates.ioproptest1.7.0direct
crates.ioquickcheck1.0.3direct
crates.iorand_core0.6.4direct
crates.iorand_core0.9.3direct
crates.iorand_xoshiro0.7.0direct
crates.iorayon1.11.0direct
crates.ioserde_core1.0.224direct
crates.iowide0.7.33direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.11indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobit-set0.8.0indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.8.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.9.2indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.19.0indirect
crates.iobytemuck1.24.0indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.1indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.5.45indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.44indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.5indirect
crates.iocriterion0.7.0indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.6.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iodiff0.1.13indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.ioenv_logger0.8.4indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.13indirect
crates.iofastrand2.3.0indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.16indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.3indirect
crates.iohalf2.6.0indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.15indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.77indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.175indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.9.4indirect
crates.iolog0.4.27indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.5indirect
crates.iometrohash1.0.7indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.iopretty_assertions1.4.1indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.101indirect
crates.ioproptest-derive0.6.0indirect
crates.ioquick-error1.2.3indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.40indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.iorand0.8.5indirect
crates.iorand0.9.2indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_xorshift0.4.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.11.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.9indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.5indirect
crates.iorpds1.1.0indirect
crates.iorustix1.0.8indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.iorusty-fork0.3.0indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.20indirect
crates.iosafe_arch0.7.4indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.224indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.224indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.142indirect
crates.iostatic_assertions1.1.0indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.106indirect
crates.iotempfile3.20.0indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotriomphe0.1.14indirect
crates.iounarray0.1.4indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.18indirect
crates.iounty0.0.4indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasi0.14.2+wasi-0.2.4indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-backend0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.100indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.77indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.9indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.1.3indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.53.3indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.53.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rt0.39.0indirect
crates.ioyansi1.0.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.26indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.26indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.