Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 00:44 UTC

joakimen / cid

Fuzzy-completion for the repositories, files, branches, pull requests and other common commands.

RustMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

joakimen/cid holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joakim L. EngesetPersonal account
8 followers47 public repossince Mar 2012Liflig

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iocidpoints to another repo — not scored0.11.3529,48930174 days agocidipfsipldmultiformatsmultihash

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 16 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 193 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year193
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 16 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv0.24.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release16
mean_days_between_releases2.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
29.8/30PR acceptance — 191/192 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs191
open_issues1
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.9/25Owner reach — 8 followers of joakimen
24.2/25Track record — 47 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjoakimen
public_repos47
account_age_days5,318
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli, rust, fuzzy-finder, developer-tools, git, github, terminal, macos, fish-shell
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages266
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 266 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes15,289
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
49.9/55Manageable file sizes — 4/43 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes104,582
source_files_sampled43
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
193commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
41releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • crates package 'cid' points at a different repository (https://github.com/multiformats/rust-cid); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 00:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioanyhow1Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap_complete4.6.7Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossterm0.29Cargo.toml
crates.ioignore0.4.31Cargo.toml
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioratatui0.30Cargo.toml
crates.iorustix1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1Cargo.toml
crates.ioskim5Cargo.toml
crates.iotime0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1.1.3Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-width0.2Cargo.toml
All dependencies 266

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 252 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow1.0.104direct
crates.ioclap4.6.1direct
crates.ioclap_complete4.6.7direct
crates.iocrossterm0.29.0direct
crates.ioignore0.4.33direct
crates.ioindexmap2.14.2direct
crates.ioratatui0.30.2direct
crates.iorustix1.1.4direct
crates.ioserde1.0.229direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151direct
crates.ioskim5.5.0direct
crates.iotime0.3.55direct
crates.iotoml1.1.6+spec-1.1.0direct
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioallocator-api20.2.21indirect
crates.ioansi-to-tui8.0.1indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioapprox0.5.1indirect
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.8indirect
crates.ioassert_enum_variants0.1.2indirect
crates.ioatomic0.6.1indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobit-set0.5.3indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.6.3indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.2indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobstr1.13.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.ioby_address1.2.1indirect
crates.iobytemuck1.25.2indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iocastaway0.2.4indirect
crates.iocc1.4.6indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocfg_aliases0.1.1indirect
crates.iocfg_aliases0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.0indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.iocompact_str0.9.1indirect
crates.ioconvert_case0.10.0indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocritical-section1.2.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.8indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.21indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.23indirect
crates.iocrossterm_winapi0.9.1indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.7indirect
crates.iocsscolorparser0.6.2indirect
crates.iodarling0.20.11indirect
crates.iodarling0.24.1indirect
crates.iodarling_core0.20.11indirect
crates.iodarling_core0.24.1indirect
crates.iodarling_macro0.20.11indirect
crates.iodarling_macro0.24.1indirect
crates.iodeltae0.3.2indirect
crates.ioderanged0.5.8indirect
crates.ioderive_builder0.20.2indirect
crates.ioderive_builder_core0.20.2indirect
crates.ioderive_builder_macro0.20.2indirect
crates.ioderive_more2.1.1indirect
crates.ioderive_more-impl2.1.1indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.iodocument-features0.2.12indirect
crates.iodowncast-rs1.2.1indirect
crates.ioeither1.18.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.ioeuclid0.22.14indirect
crates.ioeyre0.6.14indirect
crates.iofancy-regex0.11.0indirect
crates.iofastrand2.5.0indirect
crates.iofiledescriptor0.8.3indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.12indirect
crates.iofinl_unicode1.4.0indirect
crates.iofixedbitset0.4.2indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.iofutures0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.34indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.ioglobset0.4.20indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohex0.4.3indirect
crates.ioident_case1.0.1indirect
crates.ioindenter0.3.4indirect
crates.ioindoc2.0.7indirect
crates.ioinstability0.3.13indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitertools0.14.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.105indirect
crates.iokanal0.1.1indirect
crates.iokasuari0.4.12indirect
crates.iolab0.11.0indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.iolibmimalloc-sys0.1.44indirect
crates.ioline-clipping0.3.8indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolitrs1.0.0indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iolog0.4.34indirect
crates.iolru0.18.4indirect
crates.iomac_address1.1.8indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.iomemmem0.1.1indirect
crates.iomemoffset0.9.1indirect
crates.iomimalloc0.1.48indirect
crates.iominimal-lexical0.2.1indirect
crates.iomio1.2.3indirect
crates.ionix0.28.0indirect
crates.ionix0.29.0indirect
crates.ionix0.31.3indirect
crates.ionom7.1.3indirect
crates.ionom8.0.0indirect
crates.ionum-conv0.2.2indirect
crates.ionum-derive0.4.2indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ionum_threads0.1.7indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioordered-float4.6.0indirect
crates.iopalette0.7.7indirect
crates.iopalette_derive0.7.7indirect
crates.iopalette_math0.7.7indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopest2.9.1indirect
crates.iopest_derive2.9.1indirect
crates.iopest_generator2.9.1indirect
crates.iopest_meta2.9.1indirect
crates.iophf0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_codegen0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_generator0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_macros0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_shared0.11.3indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.15.0indirect
crates.ioportable-pty0.9.0indirect
crates.iopowerfmt0.2.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand0.8.8indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.ioratatui-core0.1.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-crossterm0.1.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-macros0.7.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-termina0.1.0indirect
crates.ioratatui-termwiz0.1.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-widgets0.3.2indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioroff1.1.1indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.23indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.ioserial20.2.38indirect
crates.iosha20.10.9indirect
crates.ioshared_library0.1.9indirect
crates.ioshell-quote0.7.2indirect
crates.ioshell-words1.1.1indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosignal-hook0.3.18indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-mio0.2.5indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-registry1.4.8indirect
crates.iosimdutf80.1.5indirect
crates.iosiphasher1.0.3indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.16.1indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.5indirect
crates.iostatic_assertions1.1.0indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iostrum0.28.0indirect
crates.iostrum_macros0.28.0indirect
crates.iosyn1.0.109indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.5indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotermina0.3.3indirect
crates.ioterminfo0.9.0indirect
crates.iotermios0.3.3indirect
crates.iotermwiz0.23.3indirect
crates.iothiserror1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.20indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.20indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.10indirect
crates.iotime-core0.1.9indirect
crates.iotinyvec1.12.0indirect
crates.iotinyvec_macros0.1.1indirect
crates.iotokio1.53.1indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.2indirect
crates.iotokio-util0.7.19indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.3+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotui-term0.3.4indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.ioucd-trie0.1.7indirect
crates.iounicode-display-width0.3.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1.25indirect
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3indirect
crates.iounicode-truncate2.0.1indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iouuid1.26.1indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iovt1000.16.2indirect
crates.iovte0.15.0indirect
crates.iovtparse0.6.2indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.128indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.128indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.128indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.128indirect
crates.iowezterm-bidi0.2.3indirect
crates.iowezterm-blob-leases0.1.1indirect
crates.iowezterm-color-types0.3.0indirect
crates.iowezterm-dynamic0.2.1indirect
crates.iowezterm-dynamic-derive0.1.1indirect
crates.iowezterm-input-types0.1.0indirect
crates.iowhich8.0.6indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.4indirect
crates.iowinreg0.10.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 266 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.