Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-15 10:44 UTC

jobrunner / ortus

Ortus is a Go-based REST service for point queries on GeoPackage files. It allows you to query geographic features that contain a given coordinate using spatial SQLite (SpatiaLite) queries.

GoNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#geopackage#gis#golang#spatialite#sqlite3#faunistic

jobrunner/ortus holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (22/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jo BrunnerPersonal account
14 followers60 public repossince Mar 2012Mayflower GmbH

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/jobrunner/ortusv1.3.0-4118 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 588 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year588
human_commit_share0.84
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv1.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases1.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

22At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

45Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.5/30PR acceptance — 166/169 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs166
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d35
prs_decided_30d35
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.5/25Owner reach — 14 followers of jobrunner
25/25Track record — 60 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjobrunner
public_repos60
account_age_days5,253
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 18 days ago
20/20Version history — 41 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/jobrunner/ortus
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish18

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgeopackage, gis, golang, spatialite, sqlite3, faunistic
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.1

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 84 of 84 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, third_party/gocog/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.08

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/166 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes50,941
source_files_sampled166
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — api/openapi/openapi.yaml, internal/adapters/http/openapi.yaml
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesapi/openapi/openapi.yaml, internal/adapters/http/openapi.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
588commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
41releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-15 10:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 36
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcorev1.22.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/storage/azblobv1.8.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.43.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.35go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.34go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.107.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/caddyserver/certmagicv0.25.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/muxv1.8.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/libdns/azurev0.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.48go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.6.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/paulmach/orbv0.13.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.24.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/tingold/gocogv0.0.0-20251202163215-f108ab4d8e26go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/otelawsv0.70.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/gorilla/mux/otelmuxv0.70.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.70.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetricgrpcv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttpv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpcv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/prometheusv0.67.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with jobrunner/ortus. Read them side by side →

100mattermost/mattermostMattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle..Exceptional100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional100moby/mobyThe Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systemsExceptional100openfga/openfgaA high performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google ZanzibarExceptional99stacklok/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional99stackloklabs/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.