Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 08:38 UTC

joelwmale / livewire-quill

Easily add QuillJS with image support to any Laravel Livewire component.

JavaScriptMIT★ 14 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

joelwmale/livewire-quill holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (61/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (38/100). It was last updated 61 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joel MalePersonal account
30 followers27 public repossince Mar 2013@wearepixel

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistjoelwmale/livewire-quill5.4.02,0991761 days agolaraveljoelwmalelivewire-quill

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

61Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 61 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence3/52 weeks with commits
12.7/18Commit volume25 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained8 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year25
human_commit_share0.831
days_since_last_push61
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases17 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 61 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~71.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv5.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release61
mean_days_between_releases71.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
18.1/60Stars14 stars
5/25Forks5 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars14
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.3/80Monthly downloads2,099 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesjoelwmale/livewire-quill
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads22,129
monthly_downloads2,099
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 95% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.953
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
23.5/30PR acceptance18/23 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs18
open_issues0
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.7/25Owner reach30 followers of joelwmale
22.5/25Track record27 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers30
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjoelwmale
public_repos27
account_age_days4,887
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 61 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjoelwmale/livewire-quill
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish61

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained8 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages3
assessed_packages72
unassessed_packages8
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 72 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history50 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.781
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 77
8/8Automated maintenance8 of the last 77 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.104
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
50/55Manageable file sizes1/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes721,544
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

14GitHub stars
2contributors
25commits, last 12 months
61days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512024-092025-072026-05
Major 3Minor 3Patch 5

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 08:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
7CI-Tests6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained8 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/support^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/contracts^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistlivewire/livewire^3.0|^4.0composer.json
npmcss-minify^2.1.0package.json
All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 76 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmcss-minify2.1.0direct
Packagistilluminate/contractsdirect
Packagistilluminate/supportdirect
Packagistlivewire/livewiredirect
npm@trysound/sax0.2.0indirect
npmboolbase1.0.0indirect
npmbrowserslist4.24.4indirect
npmcaniuse-api3.0.0indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001696indirect
npmcolord2.9.3indirect
npmcommander7.2.0indirect
npmcommander8.3.0indirect
npmcss-declaration-sorter6.4.1indirect
npmcss-select4.3.0indirect
npmcss-tree1.1.3indirect
npmcss-what6.1.0indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmcssnano5.1.15indirect
npmcssnano-preset-default5.2.14indirect
npmcssnano-utils3.1.0indirect
npmcsso4.2.0indirect
npmdom-serializer1.4.1indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler4.3.1indirect
npmdomutils2.8.0indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.90indirect
npmentities2.2.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmlilconfig2.1.0indirect
npmlodash.memoize4.1.2indirect
npmlodash.uniq4.5.0indirect
npmmdn-data2.0.14indirect
npmnanoid3.3.8indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.19indirect
npmnormalize-url6.1.0indirect
npmnth-check2.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.1indirect
npmpostcss-calc8.2.4indirect
npmpostcss-colormin5.3.1indirect
npmpostcss-convert-values5.1.3indirect
npmpostcss-discard-comments5.1.2indirect
npmpostcss-discard-duplicates5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-discard-empty5.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-discard-overridden5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-merge-longhand5.1.7indirect
npmpostcss-merge-rules5.1.4indirect
npmpostcss-minify-font-values5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-minify-gradients5.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-minify-params5.1.4indirect
npmpostcss-minify-selectors5.2.1indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-charset5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-display-values5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-positions5.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-repeat-style5.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-string5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-timing-functions5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-unicode5.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-url5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-normalize-whitespace5.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-ordered-values5.1.3indirect
npmpostcss-reduce-initial5.1.2indirect
npmpostcss-reduce-transforms5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.1.2indirect
npmpostcss-svgo5.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-unique-selectors5.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstable0.1.8indirect
npmstylehacks5.1.1indirect
npmsvgo2.8.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.1.2indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmyaml1.10.2indirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistorchestra/testbenchindirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-livewireindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 72 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
postcss8.5.1indirecthigh48.5.23
svgo2.8.0indirecthigh24.0.2
yaml1.10.2indirectmoderate12.8.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.