Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-29 04:29 UTC

johanneswuerbach / saucie

This library allows you to integrate results of your frontend JavaScript tests into a [Sauce jobs results page](https://saucelabs.com/docs/javascript-unit-tests-integration).

JavaScriptNo license detected★ 26 stars⑂ 19 forkssince Aug 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

johanneswuerbach/saucie holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Johannes WürbachPersonal account
124 followers286 public repossince Jun 2011@enam-co

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmsaucie4.1.010,9653233 days agojavascript-testscontinuous-integrationjs-testssaucelabs

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
14.9/18Commit volume — 45 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year45
human_commit_share0.64
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 17 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 33 days ago
5.4/27Release cadence — a release every ~396.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv4.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release33
mean_days_between_releases396.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.7/60Stars — 26 stars
10.5/25Forks — 19 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks19
stars26
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.9/80Monthly downloads — 10,965 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessaucie
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads10,965
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 67% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.671
How it's scored
36.8/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
13.4/30PR acceptance — 81/182 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs81
open_issues3
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.875
closed_unmerged_prs101
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.1/25Owner reach — 124 followers of johanneswuerbach
25/25Track record — 286 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers124
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjohanneswuerbach
public_repos286
account_age_days5,578
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 33 days ago
20/20Version history — 32 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessaucie
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish33

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages68
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:saucie@4.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 68 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://saucelabs.com/llms.txt)
34.2/40Legible commit history — 41 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://saucelabs.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.641
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 36 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.36
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/24 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes11,936
source_files_sampled24
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

26GitHub stars
10contributors
45commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
3open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿
0Stars
19Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201922014-032020-032026-03
Major 3Minor 8Patch 3

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-29 04:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmcommander^15.0.0package.json
npmcross-spawn^7.0.6package.json
npm@cypress/request^4.0.0package.json
All dependencies 91

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 88 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@cypress/request4.0.1direct
npmcommander15.0.0direct
npmcross-spawn7.0.6direct
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmasn10.2.3indirect
npmassert-plus1.0.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmaws-sign20.7.0indirect
npmaws41.13.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbcrypt-pbkdf1.0.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcaseless0.12.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.2indirect
npmdashdash1.14.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdiff9.0.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmecc-jsbn0.1.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmextsprintf1.3.0indirect
npmfind-up-simple1.0.1indirect
npmforever-agent0.6.1indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgetpass0.1.7indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhttp-signature1.4.0indirect
npmis-path-inside4.0.0indirect
npmis-typedarray1.0.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisstream0.1.2indirect
npmjs-yaml5.4.1indirect
npmjsbn0.1.1indirect
npmjson-schema0.4.0indirect
npmjson-stringify-safe5.0.1indirect
npmjsprim2.0.2indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmocha12.0.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmperformance-now2.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmqs6.16.0indirect
npmreaddirp5.1.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.1.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsshpk1.18.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments5.0.3indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtldts6.1.86indirect
npmtldts-core6.1.86indirect
npmtough-cookie5.1.2indirect
npmtunnel-agent0.6.0indirect
npmtweetnacl0.14.5indirect
npmverror1.10.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmworkerpool10.0.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:saucie@4.1.0 pulls in 68 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.