Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 02:40 UTC

johnnywang1994 / jsPDF-html2canvas

A combine usage with jsPDF & html2canvas-pro, which translating html content to PDF file.

TypeScript · HTML · JavaScriptMIT★ 86 stars⑂ 16 forkssince May 2019View on GitHub ↗

johnnywang1994/jsPDF-html2canvas holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (58/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JohnnyPersonal account

55 followers58 public repossince Sep 2018LINE, Taiwan

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	jspdf-html2canvas	1.7.0	120,450	33	4 days ago	npm jspdf html2canvas html2canvas-pro

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

58Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 4 days ago
2.1/36	Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18	Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

commits_last_year	6
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	4
active_weeks_last_year	3

Release discipline

72Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 5 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~260.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	5
latest_release_tag	v1.7.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	4
mean_days_between_releases	260.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

43Weak

How it's scored

31.3/60	Stars — 86 stars
9.8/25	Forks — 16 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	16
stars	86
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	below_threshold

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

85Excellent

How it's scored

67.7/80	Monthly downloads — 120,450 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	jspdf-html2canvas
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	120,450
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.969

Issue & PR responsiveness

49Weak

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
0.7/30	PR acceptance — 1/41 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	1
open_issues	0
closed_issues	15
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	40
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.6/25	Owner reach — 55 followers of johnnywang1994
24.9/25	Track record — 58 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	55
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	johnnywang1994
public_repos	58
account_age_days	2,879

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20	Version history — 33 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	jspdf-html2canvas
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

35Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
2.2/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	3.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	145
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 145 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

2Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.3/40	Legible commit history — 3 of 71 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.042
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 71
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/14 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	4,419
source_files_sampled	14
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

86GitHub stars

2contributors

6commits, last 12 months

4days since last push

5releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

deps.dev does not index npm:jspdf-html2canvas@1.7.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 86 ★ / 16 ⇿

86Stars

16Forks

4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 2Patch 2

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10

3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 02:40 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
3	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8	Vulnerabilities	2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	html2canvas-pro	`^1.6.7`	package.json
npm	jspdf	`^4.2.0`	package.json

All dependencies 145

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 143 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	html2canvas-pro	`1.6.7`	direct
npm	jspdf	`4.2.1`	direct
npm	@babel/runtime	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@discoveryjs/json-ext	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.11`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.1.1`	indirect
npm	@types/pako	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/raf	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	@types/trusted-types	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/ast	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/floating-point-hex-parser	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-api-error	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-buffer	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-numbers	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-bytecode	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/ieee754	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/leb128	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/utf8	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-edit	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-gen	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-opt	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-parser	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wast-printer	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webpack-cli/configtest	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	@webpack-cli/info	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	@webpack-cli/serve	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	@xtuc/ieee754	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@xtuc/long	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.17.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-import-phases	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ajv-keywords	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	base64-arraybuffer	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.10.43`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.6`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001806`	indirect
npm	canvg	`3.0.11`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	chrome-trace-event	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	clone-deep	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	colorette	`2.0.20`	indirect
npm	commander	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	core-js	`3.49.0`	indirect
npm	cross-env	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	css-line-break	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	dompurify	`3.4.12`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.392`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.24.2`	indirect
npm	envinfo	`7.21.0`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	events	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-png	`6.4.0`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fastest-levenshtein	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	fflate	`0.8.3`	indirect
npm	find-up	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	flat	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	html2canvas	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	import-local	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	interpret	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	iobuffer	`5.4.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.13.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-object	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isobject	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	jest-worker	`27.5.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	loader-runner	`4.3.2`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	merge-stream	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	minimizer-webpack-plugin	`5.6.1`	indirect
npm	neo-async	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.51`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-try	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	pako	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	performance-now	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	pkg-dir	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	raf	`3.4.1`	indirect
npm	rechoir	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	regenerator-runtime	`0.13.11`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.4`	indirect
npm	resolve-cwd	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	rgbcolor	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	schema-utils	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	shallow-clone	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.7.6`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	stackblur-canvas	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	svg-pathdata	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.49.0`	indirect
npm	text-segmentation	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	ts-loader	`9.6.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	utrie	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	watchpack	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	webpack	`5.108.4`	indirect
npm	webpack-cli	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	webpack-merge	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	webpack-sources	`3.5.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wildcard	`2.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 145 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect	high	1	`7.0.5`
fast-uri	`3.1.3`	indirect	high	1	`4.1.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records