Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-24 19:28 UTC

joowani / tree-sitter-graphql

GraphQL grammar for tree-sitter

JavaScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗

joowani/tree-sitter-graphql holds a health index of 36 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (55/100) and lowest on Vitality (24/100). It was last updated 161 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

36
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

36
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joohwan OhPersonal account
105 followers10 public repossince Nov 2012HoundDog.ai

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/joowani/tree-sitter-graphqlv0.1.0-1450 days ago
crates.iotree-sitter-graphql0.1.038,3662450 days agographqlincrementalparsingtree-sitterparser-implementationstext-editors
npmtree-sitter-graphql1.0.011622819 days ago
PyPItree-sitter-graphql0.1.0-1408 days agoincrementalparsingtree-sittergraphql

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

24At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 161 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push161
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 450 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.1.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release450
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
61.1/80Monthly downloads38,366 downloads/month across crates, go, pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/joowani/tree-sitter-graphql, tree-sitter-graphql, tree-sitter-graphql
dependents
ecosystemscrates, go, pypi
total_downloads173,805
monthly_downloads38,366
unverified_packages_excludedtree-sitter-graphql
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance2/2 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.6/25Owner reach105 followers of joowani
19.6/25Track record10 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers105
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjoowani
public_repos10
account_age_days5,012
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on crates, go, npm, pypi
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 408 days ago
12/20Version history2 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/joowani/tree-sitter-graphql, tree-sitter-graphql, tree-sitter-graphql, tree-sitter-graphql
ecosystemscrates, go, npm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish408

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://crates.io/crates/tree-sitter-graphql
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgraphql, tree-sitter, tree-sitter-grammar
has_wikino
homepagehttps://crates.io/crates/tree-sitter-graphql
docs_sitehttps://crates.io/crates/tree-sitter-graphql
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages51
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 51 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingbindings/python/tree_sitter_graphql/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 7 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsbindings/python/tree_sitter_graphql/py.typed
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.286
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (bindings/python/tree_sitter_graphql/py.typed)
52.4/55Manageable file sizes1/21 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes287,524
source_files_sampled21
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
1commits, last 12 months
161days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Go, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-24 19:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotree-sitter-language0.1Cargo.toml
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitterv0.24.0go.mod
npmnode-addon-api^8.2.1package.json
npmnode-gyp-build^4.8.2package.json
All dependencies 51

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 47 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iotree-sitter-language0.1.5direct
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitter0.24.0direct
npmnode-addon-api8.3.1direct
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.iocc1.2.19indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.9.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.15indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.4indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.95indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.40indirect
crates.ioregex1.11.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.9indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.5indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.20indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.219indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.219indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.140indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.iostreaming-iterator0.1.9indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.100indirect
crates.iotree-sitter0.25.3indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.18indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbl4.1.0indirect
npmbuffer5.7.1indirect
npmchownr1.1.4indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmfs-constants1.0.0indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmmkdirp-classic0.5.3indirect
npmnode-abi3.74.0indirect
npmnpm-run-path3.1.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmprebuildify6.0.1indirect
npmprettier3.5.3indirect
npmpump3.0.2indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.7.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmtar-fs2.1.4indirect
npmtar-stream2.2.0indirect
npmtree-sitter-cli0.25.3indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 51 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo, crates.io, npm, PyPI.