Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 00:08 UTC

jorgecarleitao / arrow2

Transmute-free Rust library to work with the Arrow format

RustApache-2.0★ 1,063 stars⑂ 227 forkssince Feb 2021archivedView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

jorgecarleitao/arrow2 holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (69/100) and lowest on Vitality (21/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jorge LeitaoPersonal account
650 followers40 public repossince Nov 2012Munin Data ApS

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioarrow20.18.0290,804381035 days agoarrowanalytics

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

21At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 872 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push872
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases22 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,098 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~49.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv0.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,098
mean_days_between_releases49.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49.1/60Stars1,063 stars
19.6/25Forks227 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks227
stars1,063
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
72.8/80Monthly downloads290,804 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesarrow2
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads7,127,109
monthly_downloads290,804
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 71% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.712
How it's scored
30.6/42Issue resolution73% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance1,093/1,160 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs1,093
open_issues107
closed_issues287
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.728
closed_unmerged_prs67
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
20.2/25Owner reach650 followers of jorgecarleitao
23.7/25Track record40 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers650
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjorgecarleitao
public_repos40
account_age_days4,997
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,035 days ago
20/20Version history38 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesarrow2
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,035

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/arrow2
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/arrow2
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject is archived
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/679 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes80,466
source_files_sampled679
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,063GitHub stars
100contributors
0commits, last 12 months
872days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
107open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'arrow-odbc-integration-testing' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'arrow-parquet-integration-testing' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'arrow-pyarrow-integration-testing' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'arrow-integration-testing' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 00:07 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 71
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioforeign_vec0.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioeither1.9Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-clone1Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuck1Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.31Cargo.toml
crates.ioethnum1Cargo.toml
crates.iohash_hasher^2.0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iosimdutf80.1.4Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown0.14Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono-tz0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iolexical-core0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv^1.1Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv-core0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv-async^1.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.9Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex-syntax0.7Cargo.toml
crates.iostreaming-iterator0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iofallible-streaming-iterator0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iojson-deserializer0.4.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioindexmap^1.6Cargo.toml
crates.iocomfy-table6.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-format0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iohex^0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iolz41.24Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools^0.10Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.21.0Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-stream0.3.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioavro-schema0.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioorc-format0.3.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde^1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_derive^1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json^1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iostrength_reduce0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iomultiversion0.7.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioodbc-api0.36Cargo.toml
crates.ioahash0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iomemchr2.6Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-buffer>=40Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema>=40Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-data>=40Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array>=40Cargo.toml
crates.ioparquet20.17Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow2arrow-odbc-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iolazy_static1.4.0arrow-odbc-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iostdext0.3.1arrow-odbc-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap^3arrow-parquet-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow2arrow-parquet-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate2^1arrow-parquet-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde^1.0arrow-parquet-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_derive^1.0arrow-parquet-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json^1.0arrow-parquet-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow2arrow-pyarrow-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.14arrow-pyarrow-integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow2integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-format0.8integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.41integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap^3integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost0.11integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_derive1.0integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.0integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iotonic0.8.0integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.1integration-testing/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-stream0.3.2integration-testing/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 71

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 56 direct and 15 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioahashdirect
crates.ioarrow-arraydirect
crates.ioarrow-bufferdirect
crates.ioarrow-datadirect
crates.ioarrow-formatdirect
crates.ioarrow-schemadirect
crates.ioasync-streamdirect
crates.ioasync-traitdirect
crates.ioavro-schemadirect
crates.iobase64direct
crates.iobytemuckdirect
crates.iochronodirect
crates.iochrono-tzdirect
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.iocomfy-tabledirect
crates.iocsvdirect
crates.iocsv-asyncdirect
crates.iocsv-coredirect
crates.iodyn-clonedirect
crates.ioeitherdirect
crates.ioethnumdirect
crates.iofallible-streaming-iteratordirect
crates.ioflate2direct
crates.ioforeign_vecdirect
crates.iofuturesdirect
crates.iohash_hasherdirect
crates.iohashbrowndirect
crates.iohexdirect
crates.ioindexmapdirect
crates.ioitertoolsdirect
crates.iojson-deserializerdirect
crates.iolazy_staticdirect
crates.iolexical-coredirect
crates.iolz4direct
crates.iomemchrdirect
crates.iomultiversiondirect
crates.ionum-traitsdirect
crates.ioodbc-apidirect
crates.ioorc-formatdirect
crates.ioparquet2direct
crates.ioprostdirect
crates.iopyo3direct
crates.ioranddirect
crates.ioregexdirect
crates.ioregex-syntaxdirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.ioserde_derivedirect
crates.ioserde_jsondirect
crates.iosimdutf8direct
crates.iostdextdirect
crates.iostreaming-iteratordirect
crates.iostrength_reducedirect
crates.iotokiodirect
crates.iotonicdirect
crates.iotracing-subscriberdirect
crates.iozstddirect
crates.ioavro-rsindirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.iocrossbeam-channelindirect
crates.iodoc-commentindirect
crates.iogetrandomindirect
crates.iologindirect
crates.ioproptestindirect
crates.iorange-readerindirect
crates.iorayonindirect
crates.iorust-s3indirect
crates.iorustc_versionindirect
crates.iosample-arrow2indirect
crates.iosample-stdindirect
crates.iosample-testindirect
crates.iotokio-utilindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.