Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-25 00:03 UTC

josephmoresena / Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions

Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions is a comprehensive library designed to streamline and enhance the interaction between .NET and native P/Invoke methods.

C#MIT★ 18 stars⑂ 1 forksince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMobile applicationhow this is determined

josephmoresena/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (48/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joseph MorenoPersonal account
19 followers17 public repossince Oct 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetRxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions3.0.0-220 days agopinvokebinaryreferenceunmanagedmarshallingmemorynativeaotutf8asciiutf8stringu8stringcstringutf8stringbuilderu8stringbuildercstringbuildercstringsequencepointerspanreadonlyspanunsafeinteropfixednativeffiabiu8literalsstackalloclocalbufferobjectbufferscopedbuffermanagedbuffermonomonoaotaotinfosysteminfonativestringmemorymanagementcrossplatform

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

66Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18Commit volume — 38 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year38
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

83Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 50 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~45.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count50
latest_release_tag3.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases45.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

20At Risk
How it's scored
20/60Stars — 18 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars18
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges11
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

63Moderate
How it's scored
50.5/80Total downloads — 72,325 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesRxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads72,325
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 49/49 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs49
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.4/25Owner reach — 19 followers of josephmoresena
21.1/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers19
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjosephmoresena
public_repos17
account_age_days2,863
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 22 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesRxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

64Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages26
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 26 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40Legible commit history — 44 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.44
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

46Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — package/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.IlPatcher/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.IlPatcher.csproj, package/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest.Legacy/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest.Legacy.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspackage/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.IlPatcher/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.IlPatcher.csproj, package/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest.Legacy/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest.Legacy.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest.Windows/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest.Windows.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ApplicationTest.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.LauncherTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.LauncherTest.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Mkbundle.Patcher/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Mkbundle.Patcher.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.VNextTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.VNextTest.csproj, src/ApplicationTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.WebApiTest/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.WebApiTest.csproj, src/Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Buffers.Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Buffers.Intermediate.csproj, src/Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.CString.Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.CString.Intermediate.csproj, src/Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Common.Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Common.Intermediate.csproj, src/Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.Intermediate/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.Intermediate.csproj, src/LegacyAppTest/AndroidAppTest/AndroidAppTest.csproj, src/LegacyAppTest/LegacyAppTest.Core/LegacyAppTest.Core.csproj, src/LegacyAppTest/MacAppTest/MacAppTest.csproj, src/LegacyAppTest/WebAssemblyAppTest/WebAssemblyAppTest.csproj, src/LegacyAppTest/iOSAppTest/iOSAppTest.csproj, src/MonoFacades/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Json/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Json.csproj, src/MonoFacades/System.Buffers/System.Buffers.csproj, src/MonoFacades/System.Memory/System.Memory.csproj, src/MonoFacades/System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions/System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions.csproj, src/Test/Rxmxnx.Assert.Tests/Rxmxnx.Assert.Tests.csproj, src/Test/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Buffers.Tests/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Buffers.Tests.csproj, src/Test/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.CString.Tests.SourceGenerator/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.CString.Tests.SourceGenerator.csproj, src/Test/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.CString.Tests/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.CString.Tests.csproj, src/Test/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Common.Tests/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Common.Tests.csproj, src/Test/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.Tests/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions.Tests.csproj, src/Test/Rxmxnx.Patch.Tests/Rxmxnx.Patch.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 3/631 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes319,454
source_files_sampled631
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

18GitHub stars
1contributors
38commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
50releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-25 00:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
8SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 26

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 26 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly3.2.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.Build3.2.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.DevServer5.0.17indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers5.3.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp5.3.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Net.Native.Compiler2.2.12-rel-33220-00indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App2.1.30indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.UniversalWindowsPlatform6.2.14indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4indirect
NuGetNUnit3.14indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.6.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable8.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http.Json3.2.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.AppCompat1.2.0.5indirect
NuGetXamarin.Essentials1.6.1indirect
NuGetXamarin.Google.Android.Material1.0.0.1indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetXunit.SkippableFact1.4.13indirect
NuGetXunit.SkippableFact1.5.61indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 26 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with josephmoresena/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions. Read them side by side →

84boltffi/boltffiA high-performance multi-language bindings generator for Rust, up to 1,000x faster than UniFFI. Ship Rust libraries that feels native to Python, Swift, Kotlin, and moreExcellent87SciSharp/NumSharpHigh Performance Computation for N-D Tensors in .NET, similar API to NumPy.Excellent92google/zerocopyZerocopy makes zero-cost memory manipulation effortless. We write `unsafe` so you don’t have to.Excellent91streamich/memfsNode.js "fs" and browser "File System API" adapters and in-memory implementations 👍Excellent90pythonnet/pythonnetPython for .NET is a package that gives Python programmers nearly seamless integration with the .NET Common Language Runtime (CLR) and provides a powerful application scripting tool for .NET developers.Excellent88Latias94/mermanMermaid.js, but headless, in Rust.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.