Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 19:51 UTC

jpvelasco / ludus

CLI tool that automates the end-to-end pipeline for deploying Unreal Engine 5 dedicated servers to AWS GameLift

GoMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 1 forksince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

jpvelasco/ludus holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Juan Pablo (JP)Personal account
13 followers14 public repossince Oct 2009AWS

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/jpvelasco/ludusv0.9.6-413 days ago—
npmludus-cli0.9.6849403 days agounreal-engineue5gameliftawsdedicated-servergame-servergamedevdeploymentdockermcpclidevopsarm64gravitonbuildgraph

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 485 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year485
human_commit_share0.85
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year22
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv0.9.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases8.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesapp.codacy.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
39.1/80Monthly downloads — 849 downloads/month across go, npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/jpvelasco/ludus, ludus-cli
dependents—
ecosystemsgo, npm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads849
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.995
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 502/532 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs502
open_issues0
closed_issues121
prs_merged_7d19
prs_decided_7d19
prs_merged_30d51
prs_decided_30d51
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of jpvelasco
20.6/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjpvelasco
public_repos14
account_age_days6,166
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go, npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 41 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/jpvelasco/ludus, ludus-cli
ecosystemsgo, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.npmjs.com/package/ludus-cli
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaws, cli, dedicated-server, devops, docker, game-server, gamelift, golang, mcp, unreal-engine, deployment, gamedev, unreal-engine-5
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/ludus-cli
docs_sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/ludus-cli
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages65
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 65 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 85 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes15,864
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 15 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.15
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/496 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes30,063
source_files_sampled496
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
2contributors
485commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
41releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 19:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.45.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.33.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudformationv1.79.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecrv1.63.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/gameliftv1.64.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iamv1.62.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/resourcegroupstaggingapiv1.39.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.110.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.48.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.28.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.46.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.46.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.46.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.46.0go.mod
All dependencies 65

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 48 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.45.1direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.33.2direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudformationv1.79.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecrv1.63.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/gameliftv1.64.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iamv1.62.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/resourcegroupstaggingapiv1.39.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.110.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.48.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.28.1direct
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.46.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.46.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.46.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.46.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.20indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.20.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.19.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.19indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.11.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.20.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.36.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.41.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5v5.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.30.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/encodingv0.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/concv0.3.1-0.20240121214520-5f936abd7ae8indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260819154853-08b0e4226688indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260819154853-08b0e4226688indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 65 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.83.1indirecthigh11.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm.