Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 23:25 UTC

jruby / activerecord-jdbc-adapter

JRuby's ActiveRecord adapter using JDBC.

Ruby · JavaBSD-2-Clause★ 468 stars⑂ 393 forkssince Mar 2008View on GitHub ↗

jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (77/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 24 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JRuby TeamOrganization
58 followers77 public repossince Feb 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsactiverecord-jdbc-adapter51.0-10854 days ago
RubyGemsactiverecord-jdbch2-adapter1.3.25-622890 days ago
RubyGemsactiverecord-jdbcmssql-adapter1.3.25-502890 days ago
RubyGemsactiverecord-jdbcmysql-adapter51.0-10954 days ago
RubyGemsactiverecord-jdbchsqldb-adapter1.3.25-632890 days ago
RubyGemsactiverecord-jdbcsqlite3-adapter51.0-10454 days ago
RubyGemsactiverecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter50.0-10654 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

56Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 24 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
13.3/18Commit volume29 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained9 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year29
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push24
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases26 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 3,221 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~108.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagv1.3.24
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3,221
mean_days_between_releases108.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

77Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
43.3/60Stars468 stars
21.6/25Forks393 forks
8.2/15Watchers31 watchers
Inputs used
forks393
stars468
watchers31
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-2-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
74.4/80Total downloads14,473,840 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesactiverecord-jdbc-adapter, activerecord-jdbch2-adapter, activerecord-jdbcmssql-adapter, activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter, activerecord-jdbchsqldb-adapter, activerecord-jdbcsqlite3-adapter, activerecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads14,473,840
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 88 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.437
How it's scored
35.3/42Issue resolution84% of issues closed
18.9/30PR acceptance389/618 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs389
open_issues94
closed_issues497
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.841
closed_unmerged_prs229
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
12.7/25Owner reach58 followers of jruby
25/25Track record77 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers58
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginjruby
public_repos77
account_age_days6,362
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable7 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 54 days ago
20/20Version history109 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesactiverecord-jdbc-adapter, activerecord-jdbch2-adapter, activerecord-jdbcmssql-adapter, activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter, activerecord-jdbchsqldb-adapter, activerecord-jdbcsqlite3-adapter, activerecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

53Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsactiverecord-jdbc-adapter, jruby, rails, activerecord, ar-jdbc
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
2.2/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained9 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: org.postgresql:postgresql 42.1.4 (critical 10.0)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,630 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages1
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages32
affected_by_severitycritical 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40Legible commit history44 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.44
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap.mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files.mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/413 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes164,879
source_files_sampled413
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

468GitHub stars
100contributors
29commits, last 12 months
24days since last push
26releases
2bus factor
94open issues
Maven, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch maven package 'org.jruby.rails:activerecord-jdbc' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 468 ★ / 393 ⇿
468Stars
393Forks
26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500468361322008-032017-052026-07
Major 0Minor 1Patch 22

Each point covers 17 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 23:25 UTC

3Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 5/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained9 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsactiverecordGemfile
RubyGemsactivemodelGemfile
RubyGemsactivesupportGemfile
RubyGemsactionpackGemfile
RubyGemsactionviewGemfile
RubyGemsactiverecordGemfile
RubyGemsactiverecordGemfile
RubyGemsactivemodelGemfile
RubyGemsactivesupportGemfile
RubyGemsactionpackGemfile
RubyGemsactionviewGemfile
RubyGemsactiverecordGemfile
RubyGemsrakeGemfile
RubyGemsjdbc-sqlite3Gemfile
RubyGemsbuilderGemfile
RubyGemserubisGemfile
RubyGemsmsgpack~> 1.7Gemfile
RubyGemsrackGemfile
RubyGemszeitwerkGemfile
Mavenorg.jruby:jruby-complete${jruby.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.postgresql:postgresql42.1.4pom.xml
All dependencies 35

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavenorg.jruby:jruby-complete10.0.0.1direct
Mavenorg.postgresql:postgresql42.1.4direct
RubyGemsactionpackdirect
RubyGemsactionviewdirect
RubyGemsactivemodeldirect
RubyGemsactiverecorddirect
RubyGemsactivesupportdirect
RubyGemsbuilderdirect
RubyGemserubisdirect
RubyGemsjdbc-sqlite3direct
RubyGemsmsgpackdirect
RubyGemsrackdirect
RubyGemsrakedirect
RubyGemszeitwerkdirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin2.5.1indirect
RubyGemsbcryptindirect
RubyGemsbenchmark-ipsindirect
RubyGemsjdbc-h2indirect
RubyGemsjdbc-hsqldbindirect
RubyGemsjdbc-jtdsindirect
RubyGemsjdbc-mysqlindirect
RubyGemsjdbc-postgresindirect
RubyGemskramdownindirect
RubyGemsminitest-excludesindirect
RubyGemsminitest-railsindirect
RubyGemsminitest-rgindirect
RubyGemsmochaindirect
RubyGemsmysql2indirect
RubyGemsostructindirect
RubyGemspgindirect
RubyGemspry-navindirect
RubyGemssqlite3indirect
RubyGemstest-unitindirect
RubyGemstest-unit-contextindirect
RubyGemsyardindirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
org.postgresql:postgresql42.1.4directcritical642.7.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.