Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 06:10 UTC

junosuarez / find-root

recursively find the closest package.json

JavaScriptMIT★ 47 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Dec 2013View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

junosuarez/find-root holds a health index of 25 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100) and lowest on Vitality (13/100). It was last updated 1342 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

juno suárezPersonal account

383 followers547 public repossince Oct 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	find-rootpoints to another repo — not scored	1.1.0	86,202,822	5	3364 days ago	fs get find closest package module base root

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 3094 daysautomated commits excludedreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintained

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 1,342 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	1,342
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

32At Risk

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 5 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36	Release recency — latest release 3,364 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~325.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	5
latest_release_tag	v1.1.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	3,364
mean_days_between_releases	325.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

35Weak

How it's scored

27/60	Stars — 47 stars
5/25	Forks — 5 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	5
stars	47
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

19Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.941

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
22.5/30	PR acceptance — 3/4 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	3
open_issues	0
closed_issues	2
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	1
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.6/25	Owner reach — 383 followers of junosuarez
25/25	Track record — 547 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	383
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	junosuarez
public_repos	547
account_age_days	5,458

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

18Critical

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 44 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	1.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	50
affected_packages	21
assessed_packages	223
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 4, high 10, moderate 6, low 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 223 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/3 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	1,248
source_files_sampled	3
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

47GitHub stars

2contributors

0commits, last 12 months

1,342days since last push

5releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
npm package 'find-root' points at a different repository (https://github.com/js-n/find-root); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿

0Stars

5Forks

1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.8 / 10

1.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 06:10 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	44 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 223

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 223 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	acorn	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ajv	`4.11.8`	indirect
npm	ajv-keywords	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-escapes	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	array-union	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	array-uniq	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	array.prototype.find	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	arrify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	babel-code-frame	`6.22.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.8`	indirect
npm	browser-stdout	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	builtin-modules	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	caller-path	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	callsites	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	chai	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	check-error	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	circular-json	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	cli-cursor	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	cli-width	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	co	`4.6.0`	indirect
npm	code-point-at	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	concat-stream	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	contains-path	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	d	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.8`	indirect
npm	debug-log	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	define-properties	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	deglob	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	del	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	diff	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	es-abstract	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	es-to-primitive	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es5-ext	`0.10.23`	indirect
npm	es6-iterator	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	es6-map	`0.1.5`	indirect
npm	es6-set	`0.1.5`	indirect
npm	es6-symbol	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	es6-weak-map	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	escope	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`3.19.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-standard	`10.2.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-standard-jsx	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-import-resolver-node	`0.2.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-module-utils	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-import	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-node	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-promise	`3.5.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-react	`6.10.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-standard	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	esprima	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	event-emitter	`0.3.5`	indirect
npm	exit-hook	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	figures	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-root	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	find-up	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	foreach	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	generate-function	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	generate-object-property	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	get-func-name	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	get-stdin	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`9.18.0`	indirect
npm	globby	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	graceful-readlink	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	growl	`1.9.2`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	has-ansi	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	inquirer	`0.12.0`	indirect
npm	interpret	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-callable	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	is-date-object	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-my-json-valid	`2.16.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-cwd	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-in-cwd	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-property	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-regex	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-resolvable	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-symbol	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`3.8.4`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	json3	`3.3.2`	indirect
npm	jsonify	`0.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonpointer	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsx-ast-utils	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	load-json-file	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.4`	indirect
npm	lodash._baseassign	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	lodash._basecopy	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	lodash._basecreate	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash._getnative	`3.9.1`	indirect
npm	lodash._isiterateecall	`3.0.9`	indirect
npm	lodash.cond	`4.5.2`	indirect
npm	lodash.create	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.isarguments	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.isarray	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	lodash.keys	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	minimist	`0.0.8`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	mocha	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	moquire	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	ms	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mute-stream	`0.0.5`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	number-is-nan	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-keys	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	object.assign	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	onetime	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.8.2`	indirect
npm	os-homedir	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-is-inside	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	pathval	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	pify	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	pinkie	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	pinkie-promise	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	pkg-conf	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	pkg-config	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	pkg-dir	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	pkg-up	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	pluralize	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	progress	`1.1.8`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	readline2	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	rechoir	`0.6.2`	indirect
npm	relquire	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	require-uncached	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	resolve	`0.2.8`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	restore-cursor	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`2.6.1`	indirect
npm	run-async	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	rx-lite	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	shelljs	`0.7.8`	indirect
npm	slice-ansi	`0.0.4`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	standard	`10.0.2`	indirect
npm	standard-engine	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	table	`3.8.3`	indirect
npm	text-table	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	through	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	tryit	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	type-detect	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	type-detect	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	typedarray	`0.0.6`	indirect
npm	uniq	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	user-home	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	wordwrap	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	write	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	xtend	`4.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 21

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 223 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 21 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
growl	`1.9.2`	indirect	critical	1	`1.10.0`
lodash	`4.17.4`	indirect	critical	10	`4.18.0`
minimist	`0.0.8`	indirect	critical	2	`1.2.6`
minimist	`1.2.0`	indirect	critical	2	`1.2.6`
ansi-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`6.0.1`
brace-expansion	`1.1.8`	indirect	high	5	`5.0.9`
debug	`2.6.0`	indirect	high	2	`4.3.1`
debug	`2.6.8`	indirect	high	2	`4.3.1`
get-func-name	`2.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`2.0.1`
js-yaml	`3.8.4`	indirect	high	7	`4.3.2`
minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect	high	4	`10.2.3`
pathval	`1.1.0`	indirect	high	1	`1.1.1`
semver	`5.3.0`	indirect	high	1	`7.5.2`
shelljs	`0.7.8`	indirect	high	2	`0.8.5`
ajv	`4.11.8`	indirect	moderate	2	`8.18.0`
diff	`3.2.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`8.0.3`
is-my-json-valid	`2.16.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.17.2`
jsonpointer	`4.0.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.0`
ms	`0.7.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.0.0`
path-parse	`1.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.0.7`
es5-ext	`0.10.23`	indirect	low	1	`0.10.63`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records