Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 09:43 UTC

kageos / kageos

AI-native service platform for individuals, teams, and enterprises: governed directories, unattended agents, typed functions, and self-hosted execution.

Go · Vue · TypeScriptCustom license★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

kageos/kageos holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

kageosOrganization
0 followers2 public repossince May 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/kageos/kageosv0.1.71-727 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,096 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,096
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year46
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 24 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagkageos-plugin-v0.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release24
mean_days_between_releases0.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
20.8/30PR acceptance — 34/49 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs34
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d15
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of kageos
4.1/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginkageos
public_repos2
account_age_days111

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 72 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/kageos/kageos
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://kageos.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbusiness-applications, go, self-hosted, source-available, vue, workflow-automation, agentic-runtime, ai-native, business-directory, enterprise-ai, governed-ai, internal-tools, personal-ai, scheduled-agents, service-tree, typed-functions, unattended-agents, ai-callable, directory-network, human-usable
has_wikino
homepagehttps://kageos.com
docs_sitehttps://kageos.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.4

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 84 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.866
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsweb/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 7/1,385 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes171,381
source_files_sampled1,385
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — core/agent-server/docs/swagger.json, core/agent-server/docs/swagger.yaml, core/api-gateway/docs/swagger.json, core/api-gateway/docs/swagger.yaml, core/app-server/docs/swagger.json, core/app-server/docs/swagger.yaml, core/app-storage/docs/swagger.json, core/app-storage/docs/swagger.yaml
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filescore/agent-server/docs/swagger.json, core/agent-server/docs/swagger.yaml, core/api-gateway/docs/swagger.json, core/api-gateway/docs/swagger.yaml, core/app-server/docs/swagger.json, core/app-server/docs/swagger.yaml, core/app-storage/docs/swagger.json, core/app-storage/docs/swagger.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
2,096commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 09:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 79
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/glebarez/sqlitev1.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kageos/kageos-sdkv0.3.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v7v7.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mozillazg/go-pinyinv0.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats.gov1.53.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.50.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/swaggo/filesv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/swaggo/gin-swaggerv1.6.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/swaggo/swagv1.16.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/xuri/excelize/v2v2.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.4.13go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.39.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.48.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/mysqlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/sqlitev1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2go.mod
npm@element-plus/icons-vue^2.3.2web/package.json
npm@fontsource/inter^5.3.0web/package.json
npm@fontsource/jetbrains-mono^5.3.0web/package.json
npm@lobehub/icons-static-svg^1.94.0web/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/loader^1.7.0web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-code^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-code-block^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-color^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-dropcursor^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-focus^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-gapcursor^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-highlight^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-history^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-image^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-link^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-placeholder^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-table^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-table-cell^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-table-header^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-table-row^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-task-item^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-task-list^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-text-align^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-text-style^3.11.0web/package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-underline^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/markdown^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/starter-kit^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@tiptap/vue-3^3.29.2web/package.json
npm@vueuse/core^14.4.0web/package.json
npmaxios^1.19.0web/package.json
npmdayjs^1.11.21web/package.json
npmecharts^6.1.0web/package.json
npmelement-plus^2.14.3web/package.json
npmjs-sha256^1.0.0web/package.json
npmjszip^3.10.1web/package.json
npmmarked^18.0.7web/package.json
npmmd-editor-v3^6.5.6web/package.json
npmmonaco-editor^0.56.0web/package.json
npmpinia^4.0.2web/package.json
npmpinia-plugin-persistedstate^4.7.1web/package.json
npmpinyin-pro^3.28.2web/package.json
npmprosemirror-transform^1.10.5web/package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4web/package.json
npmturndown^7.2.4web/package.json
npmvue^3.5.40web/package.json
npmvue-echarts^8.0.1web/package.json
npmvue-i18n^11.4.8web/package.json
npmvue-router^5.2.0web/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.