Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 08:06 UTC

kahunakv / kommander

Distributed consensus with Raft

C#MIT★ 6 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined
#c-sharp#dotnet#leader-election#raft#raft-consensus-algorithm

kahunakv/kommander holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Kahuna Personal account
1 follower11 public repossince Mar 2025

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetKommander1.6.1-2210 days agoraftconsensuspaxosdistributedleaderelection

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

75Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 288 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year288
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year16

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 18 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 13 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count18
latest_release_tagv1.3.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases10.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars6
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate
How it's scored
48.2/80Total downloads — 43,840 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesKommander
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads43,840
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

31At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

29At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of kahunakv
10.9/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginkahunakv
public_repos11
account_age_days551
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 221 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesKommander
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

38Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://kahunakv.github.io/kommander.github.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsc-sharp, dotnet, leader-election, raft, raft-consensus-algorithm
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://kahunakv.github.io/kommander.github.io/
docs_sitehttps://kahunakv.github.io/kommander.github.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages20
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 20 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

19Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.7/40Legible commit history — 35 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.35
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Kommander.MicroBenchmarks/Kommander.MicroBenchmarks.csproj, Kommander.Server/Kommander.Server.csproj, Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsKommander.MicroBenchmarks/Kommander.MicroBenchmarks.csproj, Kommander.Server/Kommander.Server.csproj, Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj, Kommander/Kommander.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
53.7/55Manageable file sizes — 14/599 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes170,892
source_files_sampled599
oversized_source_files14

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — Kommander/Communication/Grpc/Protos/raft.proto, Kommander/System/Protos/raft_system.proto, Kommander/WAL/Protos/rocksdb_raftlog.proto
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesKommander/Communication/Grpc/Protos/raft.proto, Kommander/System/Protos/raft_system.proto, Kommander/WAL/Protos/rocksdb_raftlog.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

6GitHub stars
1contributors
288commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
18releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 08:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8Kommander.MicroBenchmarks/Kommander.MicroBenchmarks.csproj
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1Kommander.Server/Kommander.Server.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj
NuGetMartinCostello.Logging.XUnit.v30.7.1Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.0Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj
NuGetXunit.Combinatorial2.0.24Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.v32.0.3Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5Kommander.Tests/Kommander.Tests.csproj
NuGetFlurl4.0.0Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite10.0.12Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite32.1.12Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.12Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing10.0.12Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetRocksDB11.8.1.4423Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.29.6Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetGrpc.AspNetCore2.67.0Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetGrpc.AspNetCore.Server.Reflection2.67.0Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetGrpc.Net.Client2.67.0Kommander/Kommander.csproj
NuGetGrpc.Tools2.68.1Kommander/Kommander.csproj
All dependencies 20

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8direct
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetFlurl4.0.0direct
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2direct
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.29.6direct
NuGetGrpc.AspNetCore2.67.0direct
NuGetGrpc.AspNetCore.Server.Reflection2.67.0direct
NuGetGrpc.Net.Client2.67.0direct
NuGetGrpc.Tools2.68.1direct
NuGetMartinCostello.Logging.XUnit.v30.7.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite10.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.0direct
NuGetRocksDB11.8.1.4423direct
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite32.1.12direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing10.0.12direct
NuGetXunit.Combinatorial2.0.24direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
NuGetxunit.v32.0.3direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 20 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with kahunakv/kommander. Read them side by side →

99AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional98GitTools/GitVersionFrom git log to SemVer in no timeExceptional96reactiveui/refitThe automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, Refit turns your REST API into a live interface.Exceptional94nats-io/nats.netAsync .NET client for NATS: pub/sub, request/reply, JetStream, KV, Object Store, ServicesExceptional94riok/mapperlyA .NET source generator for generating object mappings. No runtime reflection.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.