Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 12:30 UTC

keithamus / parse-packagejson-name

Parse an npm package name and returns some mildly interesting details about it

JavaScriptNo license detected★ 2 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Dec 2015View on GitHub ↗

keithamus/parse-packagejson-name holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (61/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (16/100). It was last updated 45 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

39
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

39
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Keith CirkelPersonal account
1,804 followers365 public repossince Aug 2009Mozilla

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmparse-packagejson-name1.1.168,820445 days agonamepackage.jsonparsescope

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 45 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
9/18Commit volume9 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year9
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push45
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases3 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 45 days ago
5.4/27Release cadencea release every ~1,941.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv1.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release45
mean_days_between_releases1,941.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

29At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
64.5/80Monthly downloads68,820 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesparse-packagejson-name
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads68,820
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 72% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.722
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
8.6/30PR acceptance4/14 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs4
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
23.4/25Owner reach1,804 followers of keithamus
25/25Track record365 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,804
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginkeithamus
public_repos365
account_age_days6,232
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 45 days ago
12/20Version history4 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesparse-packagejson-name
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish45

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
2.2/7.5Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories14
affected_packages5
assessed_packages82
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 82 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

16Critical · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes1,599
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2GitHub stars
4contributors
9commits, last 12 months
45days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212018-102022-052025-12

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
2.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 12:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 4/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 82 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.2indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchai3.5.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdeep-eql0.1.3indirect
npmdiff7.0.0indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmminimatch9.0.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmmocha11.7.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.2indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtype-detect0.1.1indirect
npmtype-detect1.0.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmworkerpool9.3.4indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 82 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion2.0.2indirecthigh45.0.9
js-yaml4.1.1indirecthigh44.3.2
minimatch9.0.5indirecthigh310.2.3
serialize-javascript6.0.2indirecthigh27.0.5
diff7.0.0indirectmoderate18.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.