Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 13:12 UTC

kion / mbgen

Static micro-blog site generator

GoAGPL-3.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

kion/mbgen holds a health index of 42 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (69/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

42
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

42
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KionPersonal account
7 followers9 public repossince Mar 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/kion/mbgen/v2v2.0.5-60 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
14/18Commit volume35 commits in the last year
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
commits_last_year35
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv2.0.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

34At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
6.5/25Owner reach7 followers of kion
19.3/25Track record9 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginkion
public_repos9
account_age_days6,033
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history6 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/kion/mbgen/v2
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
4.5/7.5Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities42 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
32.2/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: github.com/disintegration/imaging v1.6.2 (low)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
39/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,101 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories58
affected_packages10
assessed_packages86
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1, moderate 1, low 1, unknown 5
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 86 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.7/40Legible commit history5 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.05
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
52.8/55Manageable file sizes1/25 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes326,785
source_files_sampled25
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
35commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 13:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
6Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities42 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.123.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/disintegration/imagingv1.6.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/feedsv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-getterv1.8.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.8.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmark-metav1.1.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies 86

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 76 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.123.0direct
Gogithub.com/disintegration/imagingv1.6.2direct
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/feedsv1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-getterv1.8.6direct
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.8.2direct
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmark-metav1.1.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gocel.dev/exprv0.25.1indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.20.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.8indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/iamv1.9.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/monitoringv1.27.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.62.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.55.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.9indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.16indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.15indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/iniv1.8.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.8indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.14indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.99.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.30.16indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.35.20indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.42.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.25.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/go-netrcv0.0.0-20140422174119-9fd32a8b3d3dindirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cncf/xds/gov0.0.0-20260202195803-dba9d589def2indirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoyv1.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validatev1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.15indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/detectors/gcpv1.32.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/exporter/metricv0.56.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/internal/resourcemappingv0.56.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/aws-sdk-go-base/v2v2.0.0-beta.72indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-safetempv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespathv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.5indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/planetscale/vtprotobufv0.6.1-0.20240319094008-0393e58bdf10indirect
Gogithub.com/spiffe/go-spiffe/v2v2.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.15indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/gcpv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.68.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.68.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.50.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.39.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.276.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20260414002931-afd174a4e478indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260414002931-afd174a4e478indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260414002931-afd174a4e478indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.80.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 86 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.50.0indirectcritical300.56.0
google.golang.org/grpcv1.80.0indirectcritical51.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/imagev0.39.0indirecthigh80.45.0
golang.org/x/netv0.53.0indirectmoderate81.27.0-rc.3
github.com/disintegration/imagingv1.6.2directlow1
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.55.6indirectunknown2
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.5indirectunknown11.18.7
go.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirectunknown11.44.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.43.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.36.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.