Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 23:37 UTC

kitsyai / cnos

config management

TypeScript · GoMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolWeb interfacehow this is determined

kitsyai/cnos holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated 35 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

kitsy.aiOrganization
0 followers14 public repossince Dec 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/kitsyai/cnos/packages/gov1.18.0-1635 days ago—
npm@kitsy/cnos-ui1.18.01171935 days ago—
npm@kitsy/cnos-cli1.18.01963935 days agocnoscliconfig
npm@kitsy/cnos1.18.03103935 days agocnosconfigruntime
npm@kitsy/cnos-next1.18.02263835 days agocnosnextjsconfig
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-rpc1.18.026135 days ago—
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-http1.18.044135 days ago—
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-server1.18.038135 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

56Moderate
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 35 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 231 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year231
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push35
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 11 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv1.17.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases0.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

49Weak
How it's scored
39.1/80Monthly downloads — 849 downloads/month across go, npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/kitsyai/cnos/packages/go, @kitsy/cnos-ui, @kitsy/cnos-cli, @kitsy/cnos, @kitsy/cnos-next
dependents—
ecosystemsgo, npm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads849
unverified_packages_excluded@kitsy/cnos-var-rpc, @kitsy/cnos-var-http, @kitsy/cnos-var-server
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

33At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

40Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of kitsyai
10/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginkitsyai
public_repos14
account_age_days268

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on go, npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 35 days ago
20/20Version history — 39 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/kitsyai/cnos/packages/go, @kitsy/cnos-ui, @kitsy/cnos-cli, @kitsy/cnos, @kitsy/cnos-next, @kitsy/cnos-var-rpc, @kitsy/cnos-var-http, @kitsy/cnos-var-server
ecosystemsgo, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish35

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 131 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@kitsy/cnos@1.18.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .agents/AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 95 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.95
agent_instruction_files.agents/AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,930

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Aws/Kitsy.Cnos.Aws.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Azure/Kitsy.Cnos.Azure.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Firebase/Kitsy.Cnos.Firebase.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — examples/basic-node/tsconfig.json, examples/layered-config/tsconfig.json, examples/monorepo-app/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/cnos/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/next/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/var-http/tsconfig.json, packages/var-rpc/tsconfig.json, packages/var-server/tsconfig.json, packages/var-testkit/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-aws-secrets-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-azure-key-vault/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-fake/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-firebase-secrets/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-gcp-secret-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-hashicorp/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-testkit/tsconfig.json, packages/vite/tsconfig.json, packages/webpack/tsconfig.json, plugins/basic-schema/tsconfig.json, plugins/cli-args/tsconfig.json, plugins/dotenv/tsconfig.json, plugins/env-export/tsconfig.json, plugins/filesystem/tsconfig.json, plugins/process-env/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 76 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsexamples/basic-node/tsconfig.json, examples/layered-config/tsconfig.json, examples/monorepo-app/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/cnos/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/next/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/var-http/tsconfig.json, packages/var-rpc/tsconfig.json, packages/var-server/tsconfig.json, packages/var-testkit/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-aws-secrets-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-azure-key-vault/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-fake/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-firebase-secrets/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-gcp-secret-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-hashicorp/tsconfig.json, packages/vault-testkit/tsconfig.json, packages/vite/tsconfig.json, packages/webpack/tsconfig.json, plugins/basic-schema/tsconfig.json, plugins/cli-args/tsconfig.json, plugins/dotenv/tsconfig.json, plugins/env-export/tsconfig.json, plugins/filesystem/tsconfig.json, plugins/process-env/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.76
toolchain_manifestspackages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Aws/Kitsy.Cnos.Aws.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Azure/Kitsy.Cnos.Azure.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Firebase/Kitsy.Cnos.Firebase.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Gcp/Kitsy.Cnos.Gcp.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.HashiCorp/Kitsy.Cnos.HashiCorp.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos.Tests/Kitsy.Cnos.Tests.csproj, packages/csharp/Kitsy.Cnos/Kitsy.Cnos.csproj, packages/go/go.mod, packages/go/varrpc/go.mod, packages/go/vault/aws/go.mod, packages/go/vault/azure/go.mod, packages/go/vault/firebase/go.mod, packages/go/vault/gcp/go.mod, packages/go/vault/hashicorp/go.mod, packages/java/cnos-java-aws/pom.xml, packages/java/cnos-java-azure/pom.xml, packages/java/cnos-java-firebase/pom.xml, packages/java/cnos-java-gcp/pom.xml, packages/java/cnos-java-hashicorp/pom.xml, packages/java/cnos-java/pom.xml, packages/java/pom.xml, packages/kotlin/cnos-kotlin-aws/pom.xml, packages/kotlin/cnos-kotlin-azure/pom.xml, packages/kotlin/cnos-kotlin-firebase/pom.xml, packages/kotlin/cnos-kotlin-gcp/pom.xml, packages/kotlin/cnos-kotlin-hashicorp/pom.xml, packages/kotlin/cnos-kotlin/pom.xml, packages/kotlin/pom.xml, packages/rust/Cargo.toml, packages/rust/cnos-aws/Cargo.toml, packages/rust/cnos-azure/Cargo.toml, packages/rust/cnos-firebase/Cargo.toml, packages/rust/cnos-gcp/Cargo.toml, packages/rust/cnos-hashicorp/Cargo.toml, packages/rust/cnos-tests/Cargo.toml, packages/rust/cnos/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 5/534 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes92,739
source_files_sampled534
oversized_source_files5

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — packages/var-rpc/proto/cnos/var/v1/var.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespackages/var-rpc/proto/cnos/var/v1/var.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
231commits, last 12 months
35days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 23:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities131 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 41
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@kitsy/cnosworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-uiworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-rpcworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-serverworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npmsmol-toml^1.4.2packages/cli/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-httpworkspace:*packages/cnos/package.json
npmyaml^2.8.3packages/cnos/package.json
npmyaml^2.8.3packages/core/package.json
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1packages/go/go.mod
Mavenai.kitsy:cnos-java${project.version}packages/java/pom.xml
Mavenai.kitsy:cnos-java-gcp${project.version}packages/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind${jackson.version}packages/java/pom.xml
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:secretsmanager2.25.27packages/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.cloud:google-cloud-secretmanager2.35.0packages/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.azure:azure-security-keyvault-secrets4.8.3packages/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.azure:azure-identity1.12.2packages/java/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib${kotlin.version}packages/kotlin/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind${jackson.version}packages/kotlin/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin${jackson.version}packages/kotlin/pom.xml
Mavencom.azure:azure-security-keyvault-secrets4.8.2packages/kotlin/pom.xml
Mavencom.azure:azure-identity1.12.1packages/kotlin/pom.xml
npm@kitsy/cnosworkspace:*packages/next/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/postcss^4.2.4packages/ui/package.json
npm@vitejs/plugin-react^6.0.1packages/ui/package.json
npmreact^19.2.0packages/ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.0packages/ui/package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.2.4packages/ui/package.json
npmvite^8.0.10packages/ui/package.json
npm@grpc/grpc-js^1.10.0packages/var-rpc/package.json
npm@grpc/proto-loader^0.7.10packages/var-rpc/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-serverworkspace:*packages/var-rpc/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-coreworkspace:*packages/var-testkit/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-var-serverworkspace:*packages/var-testkit/package.json
npm@aws-sdk/client-secrets-manager^3.1067.0packages/vault-aws-secrets-manager/package.json
npm@azure/identity^4.13.1packages/vault-azure-key-vault/package.json
npm@azure/keyvault-secrets^4.11.2packages/vault-azure-key-vault/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-coreworkspace:*packages/vault-fake/package.json
npm@google-cloud/secret-manager^6.1.3packages/vault-firebase-secrets/package.json
npm@google-cloud/secret-manager^6.1.3packages/vault-gcp-secret-manager/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnosworkspace:*packages/vault-testkit/package.json
npm@kitsy/cnos-coreworkspace:*packages/vault-testkit/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@kitsy/cnos@1.18.0 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with kitsyai/cnos. Read them side by side →

96e2b-dev/E2BOpen-source, secure environment with real-world tools for enterprise-grade agents.Exceptional97onyx-dot-app/onyxOpen Source AI Platform - AI Chat with advanced features that works with every LLMExceptional98nrwl/nxThe Monorepo Platform that amplifies both developers and AI agents. Nx optimizes your builds, scales your CI, and fixes failed PRs automatically. Ship in half the time.Exceptional98boa-dev/boaBoa is an embeddable Javascript engine written in Rust.Exceptional96NVIDIA/aicrTooling for optimized, validated, and reproducible GPU-accelerated AI runtime in KubernetesExceptional96electric-sql/electricThe agent platform built on sync.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm.