Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 02:33 UTC

kontent-ai / webhook-helper-js

Utility for working with Kontent.ai webhooks

TypeScriptMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#kontent-sdk#kontent-javascript#kontent-ai#kontent-ai-tool

kontent-ai/webhook-helper-js holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (53/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Kontent.aiOrganization · verified domain
77 followers65 public repossince Apr 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@kontent-ai/webhook-helper4.1.112,3081737 days agokontent.aikontentkontent-webhook

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

52Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 16 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
14.7/18Commit volume — 42 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year42
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 37 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~75.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv4.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release37
mean_days_between_releases75.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

18Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
6/15Watchers — 13 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars4
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

68Good
How it's scored
54.5/80Monthly downloads — 12,308 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@kontent-ai/webhook-helper
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads12,308
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 56% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.556

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
16.7/30PR acceptance — 20/36 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues0
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
13.6/25Owner reach — 77 followers of kontent-ai
21.7/25Track record — 65 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers77
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginkontent-ai
public_repos65
account_age_days1,591

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 37 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@kontent-ai/webhook-helper
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish37

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json, eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicskontent-sdk, kontent-javascript, kontent-ai, kontent-ai-tool
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@kontent-ai/webhook-helper@4.1.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

16Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.9/40Legible commit history — 28 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.298
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json, eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes10,769
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
7contributors
42commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412021-082022-072023-07

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 02:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 2/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmzod^4.4.3package.json
npmzod-validation-error^5.0.0package.json
All dependencies 188

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 186 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmzod4.4.3direct
npmzod-validation-error5.0.0direct
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.5indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.5indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.10.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@kontent-ai/biome-config0.5.1indirect
npm@kontent-ai/eslint-config3.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.62.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.62.3indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node24.13.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.65.0indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.8indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.1indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.8.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.3indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.23indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrollup4.62.3indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvite7.3.6indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@kontent-ai/webhook-helper@4.1.1 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with kontent-ai/webhook-helper-js. Read them side by side →

83kontent-ai/smart-linkKontent.ai Smart Link SDK can be used to automatically inject smart links to Kontent.ai according to manually specified HTML data attributes on your website. It also lets you connect your website with Live Preview(for faster editing and preview of your content).Excellent81kontent-ai/delivery-sdk-jsKontent Delivery SDK for JavascriptExcellent84kontent-ai/management-sdk-jsSDK for Kontent.ai Management APIExcellent77kontent-ai/model-generator-jsGood75kontent-ai/core-sdk-jsGood86kontent-ai/delivery-sdk-netKontent.ai Delivery .NET SDKExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.