Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 10:53 UTC

koriym / Koriym.Attributes

A reader can read both doctrine/annotations and PHP8 attributes with a doctrine annotation interface.

PHPMIT★ 42 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗

koriym/Koriym.Attributes holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on Vitality (29/100). It was last updated 232 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Akihito KoriyamaPersonal account
262 followers255 public repossince Dec 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistkoriym/attributes1.0.772,18911378 days agoannotationattribute

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

29At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 232 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18Commit volume6 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year6
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push232
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases11 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 378 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~188.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tag1.0.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release378
mean_days_between_releases188.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.2/60Stars42 stars
7/25Forks8 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars42
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
64.8/80Monthly downloads72,189 downloads/month across packagist
7.2/20Registry dependents11 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageskoriym/attributes
dependents11
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads3,757,687
monthly_downloads72,189
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 91% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.91
How it's scored
33.6/42Issue resolution80% of issues closed
25.9/30PR acceptance25/29 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs25
open_issues1
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.8
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.4/25Owner reach262 followers of koriym
25/25Track record255 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers262
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginkoriym
public_repos255
account_age_days5,725
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 378 days ago
20/20Version history11 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageskoriym/attributes
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish378

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://packagist.org/packages/koriym/attributes
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, annotatios, attributes
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://packagist.org/packages/koriym/attributes
docs_sitehttps://packagist.org/packages/koriym/attributes
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages59
unassessed_packages6
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 59 resolved dependencies against OSV. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.3/40Legible commit history38 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.38
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/25 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes5,652
source_files_sampled25
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

42GitHub stars
6contributors
6commits, last 12 months
232days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468822020-122023-042025-08
Major 1Minor 1Patch 7

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 10:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests2 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/annotations^1.12 || ^2.0composer.json
All dependencies 65

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 64 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/annotationsdirect
Packagistamphp/amp3.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream2.1.2indirect
Packagistamphp/cache2.0.1indirect
Packagistamphp/dns2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parallel2.3.2indirect
Packagistamphp/parser1.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/pipeline1.2.3indirect
Packagistamphp/process2.0.3indirect
Packagistamphp/serialization1.0.0indirect
Packagistamphp/socket2.3.1indirect
Packagistamphp/sync2.3.0indirect
Packagistbamarni/composer-bin-pluginindirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdanog/advanced-json-rpc3.2.2indirect
Packagistdaverandom/libdns2.1.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.1.2indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard12.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.5indirect
Packagistext-pdoindirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.5.3indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistkelunik/certificate1.1.3indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.5.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.5.0indirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper5.0.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.6.2indirect
Packagistopenmetrics-php/exposition-text0.4.2indirect
Packagistpdepend/pdepend2.16.2indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.6.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.10.0indirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmd2.15.0indirect
Packagistphpmetrics/phpmetricsindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.31indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.22.1indirect
Packagistspatie/array-to-xml3.4.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/config7.3.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.3.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection7.3.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.3.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.3.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter7.3.4indirect
Packagistvimeo/psalm6.13.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.12.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 59 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.4indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.