Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 17:22 UTC

kovidgoyal / kitty

If you live in the terminal, kitty is made for you! Cross-platform, fast, feature-rich, GPU based.

Python · C · GoGPL-3.0★ 34,928 stars⑂ 1,509 forkssince Oct 2016View on GitHub ↗

kovidgoyal/kitty holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (66/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Kovid GoyalPersonal account
5,722 followers45 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/kittyv0.48.2-14248 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,829 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,829
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,826 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~-182.9 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagnightly
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,826
mean_days_between_releases-182.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

85Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 34,928 stars
25/25Forks — 1,509 forks
12.7/15Watchers — 190 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,509
stars34,928
watchers190
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 39 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.921
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
22.6/30PR acceptance — 1,535/2,038 decided PRs merged
11.9/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 11/12 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 11/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs1,535
open_issues9
closed_issues7,033
prs_merged_7d12
prs_decided_7d15
prs_merged_30d37
prs_decided_30d50
issue_closed_ratio0.999
closed_unmerged_prs503
first_time_authors_30d8
first_time_prs_merged_30d11
first_time_prs_decided_30d12
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach — 5,722 followers of kovidgoyal
24.1/25Track record — 45 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,722
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginkovidgoyal
public_repos45
account_age_days5,367
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 48 days ago
20/20Version history — 142 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/kovidgoyal/kitty
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish48

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterminal-emulators, opengl, terminfo, vt100, python, c, terminal, kitty, kitty-terminal, go, golang, golang-application
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/
docs_sitehttps://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 11/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 39 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages37
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 37 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.2/40Legible commit history — 27 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.284
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,614
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — 3rdparty/base64/lib/tables/Makefile, Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files3rdparty/base64/lib/tables/Makefile, Makefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
52.2/55Manageable file sizes — 43/845 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes933,369
source_files_sampled845
oversized_source_files43

Key facts

34,928GitHub stars
98contributors
2,829commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
9open issues
Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 26 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,509 ⇿
0Stars
1,509Forks
67Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

4006008001,0001,2001,4001,6001,509142021-082024-032026-09
Major 0Minor 25Patch 41

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 17:22 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests9 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 11/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/ALTree/bigfloatv0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.27.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2v1.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/emmansun/base64v0.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hako/durafmtv0.0.0-20210608085754-5c1018a4e16bgo.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.20.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/dbusv0.0.0-20250519011319-e811c41c0bc1go.mod
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/go-parallelv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/go-shmv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/imagingv1.8.23go.mod
Gogithub.com/nwaples/rardecode/v2v2.4.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/seancfoley/ipaddress-gov1.8.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/sgtdi/fswatcherv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/zeebo/xxh3v1.1.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230801115018-d63ba01acd4bgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.46.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.48.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.42.0go.mod
Gohowett.net/plistv1.0.1go.mod
All dependencies 44

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 19 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.27.0direct
Gogithub.com/altree/bigfloatv0.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2v1.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/emmansun/base64v0.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/hako/durafmtv0.0.0-20210608085754-5c1018a4e16bdirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.20.0direct
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/dbusv0.0.0-20250519011319-e811c41c0bc1direct
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/go-parallelv1.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/go-shmv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/kovidgoyal/imagingv1.8.23direct
Gogithub.com/nwaples/rardecode/v2v2.4.1direct
Gogithub.com/seancfoley/ipaddress-gov1.8.3direct
Gogithub.com/sgtdi/fswatcherv1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.8direct
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.16direct
Gogithub.com/zeebo/xxh3v1.1.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230801115018-d63ba01acd4bdirect
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.46.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.48.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.42.0direct
Gohowett.net/plistv1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2v2.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.2.6indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.2.10indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9statsv0.0.0-20230326075908-cb1d2100619aindirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstatv0.0.0-20240221224432-82ca36839d55indirect
Gogithub.com/rwcarlsen/goexifv0.0.0-20190401172101-9e8deecbddbdindirect
Gogithub.com/seancfoley/bintreev1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
PyPIfuro—indirect
PyPIinstaller0.7.0indirect
PyPImatplotlib—indirect
PyPIpackaging23.1indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild—indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton—indirect
PyPIsphinx-design—indirect
PyPIsphinxext-opengraph—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 37 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.