Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 02:19 UTC

kubb-labs / kubb

🧡 The meta framework for code generation. Automate OpenAPI to type-safe TypeScript, Zod, and TanStack Query with a modular, plugin-based engine.

TypeScriptMIT★ 1,795 stars⑂ 145 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolPluginhow this is determined

kubb-labs/kubb holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KubbOrganization
37 followers6 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 4,696 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year4,696
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagkubb@5.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
52.8/60Stars — 1,795 stars
18/25Forks — 145 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks145
stars1,795
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 3,143,279 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@kubb/ast, @kubb/cli, @kubb/kit, @kubb/mcp, @kubb/core, kubb, @kubb/studio, @kubb/parser-md
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,143,279
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 85% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 78 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled78
top_contributor_share0.848
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
21.7/30PR acceptance — 2,240/3,103 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2,240
open_issues7
closed_issues760
prs_merged_7d27
prs_decided_7d33
prs_merged_30d33
prs_decided_30d42
issue_closed_ratio0.991
closed_unmerged_prs863
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.4/25Owner reach — 37 followers of kubb-labs
13.5/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers37
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginkubb-labs
public_repos6
account_age_days1,341

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 1,416 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@kubb/ast, @kubb/cli, @kubb/kit, @kubb/mcp, @kubb/core, kubb, @kubb/studio, @kubb/parser-md
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://kubb.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsplugin-manager, swagger, typescript, axios, codegen, kubb, openapi, react, react-query, zod, solid, svelte, vue, swr, zodios, faker, msw, claude, mcp
has_wikino
homepagehttps://kubb.dev
docs_sitehttps://kubb.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
1.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages76
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:kubb@5.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 76 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://kubb.dev/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 84 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://kubb.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.894
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,252
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — internals/shared/tsconfig.json, internals/utils/tsconfig.json, packages/adapter-oas/tsconfig.json, packages/ast/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/kit/tsconfig.json, packages/kubb/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/parser-md/tsconfig.json, packages/parser-ts/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-barrel/tsconfig.json, packages/renderer-jsx/tsconfig.json, packages/studio/tsconfig.json, packages/unplugin-kubb/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 34 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsinternals/shared/tsconfig.json, internals/utils/tsconfig.json, packages/adapter-oas/tsconfig.json, packages/ast/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/kit/tsconfig.json, packages/kubb/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/parser-md/tsconfig.json, packages/parser-ts/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-barrel/tsconfig.json, packages/renderer-jsx/tsconfig.json, packages/studio/tsconfig.json, packages/unplugin-kubb/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.34
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/375 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes159,834
source_files_sampled375
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,795GitHub stars
78contributors
4,696commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
7open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 145 ⇿
0Stars
145Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014442023-042024-122026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 02:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
3Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 56
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@kubb/astworkspace:*packages/adapter-oas/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/adapter-oas/package.json
npm@kubb/kitworkspace:*packages/adapter-oas/package.json
npm@readme/openapi-parser^8.0.2packages/adapter-oas/package.json
npm@scalar/openapi-upgrader^0.2.15packages/adapter-oas/package.json
npmapi-ref-bundler0.5.1packages/adapter-oas/package.json
npmyamlcatalog:packages/adapter-oas/package.json
npm@clack/prompts^1.7.0packages/cli/package.json
npm@gunshi/plugin-dryrun^0.37.1packages/cli/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npmchokidar^5.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmgunshi^0.37.1packages/cli/package.json
npmjiti^2.7.0packages/cli/package.json
npmtinyexeccatalog:packages/cli/package.json
npmunconfig^7.5.0packages/cli/package.json
npmverkit^0.4.0packages/cli/package.json
npm@kubb/astworkspace:*packages/core/package.json
npm@kubb/astworkspace:*packages/kit/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/kit/package.json
npm@kubb/adapter-oasworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/cliworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/kitworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/mcpworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/parser-mdworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/parser-tsworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-barrelworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/renderer-jsxworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/studioworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npmunplugin-kubbworkspace:*packages/kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/adapter-oasworkspace:*packages/mcp/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/mcp/package.json
npm@tmcp/adapter-valibot^0.1.6packages/mcp/package.json
npm@tmcp/transport-stdio^0.5.0packages/mcp/package.json
npmtmcp^1.20.0packages/mcp/package.json
npmvalibot^1.4.2packages/mcp/package.json
npm@kubb/kitworkspace:*packages/parser-md/package.json
npmyamlcatalog:packages/parser-md/package.json
npm@kubb/kitworkspace:*packages/parser-ts/package.json
npmtypescriptcatalog:packages/parser-ts/package.json
npm@kubb/astworkspace:*packages/plugin-barrel/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/plugin-barrel/package.json
npm@kubb/kitworkspace:*packages/renderer-jsx/package.json
npmyamlcatalog:packages/renderer-jsx/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/studio/package.json
npmmagicast^0.5.4packages/studio/package.json
npmofetch^1.5.1packages/studio/package.json
npmremeda^2.45.0packages/studio/package.json
npmtinyexeccatalog:packages/studio/package.json
npmunstorage^1.17.5packages/studio/package.json
npmws^8.21.3packages/studio/package.json
npm@kubb/adapter-oasworkspace:*packages/unplugin-kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/coreworkspace:*packages/unplugin-kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/parser-tsworkspace:*packages/unplugin-kubb/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-barrelworkspace:*packages/unplugin-kubb/package.json
npmunplugin^3.3.0packages/unplugin-kubb/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:kubb@5.1.0 pulls in 76 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.