Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 09:41 UTC

kyma-project / md-check-link

Tool for checking links in markdown files. Supports also links to the website hosted with docsify.

JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 6 forkssince Jan 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

kyma-project/md-check-link holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (21/100). It was last updated 178 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KymaOrganization · verified domain
124 followers72 public repossince May 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmmd-check-link0.0.51,1915501 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

35Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 178 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
11.7/18Commit volume19 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year19
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push178
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases6 version tags (no GitHub releases)
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 501 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~92.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tag0.0.5
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release501
mean_days_between_releases92.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
41/80Monthly downloads1,191 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmd-check-link
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,191
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 52% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth8 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.518
How it's scored
38.3/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance23/23 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 12/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs23
open_issues2
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.913
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.1/25Owner reach124 followers of kyma-project
25/25Track record72 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers124
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginkyma-project
public_repos72
account_age_days3,054
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 501 days ago
20/20Version history5 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmd-check-link
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish501

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 12/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
1/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages31
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:md-check-link@0.0.5 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 31 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

21At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16.1/40Legible commit history25 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.301
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 83
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes13,611
source_files_sampled1
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
8contributors
19commits, last 12 months
178days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612024-052025-012025-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 09:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests10 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 12/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
2SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmasync^3.2.4package.json
npmchalk^5.2.0package.json
npmcommander^11.1.0package.json
npmisemail^3.2.0package.json
npmmarkdown-link-extractor^3.1.0package.json
All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 114 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmasync3.2.5direct
npmchalk4.1.2direct
npmchalk5.3.0direct
npmcommander11.1.0direct
npmisemail3.2.0direct
npmmarkdown-link-extractor3.1.0direct
npm@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap1.2.6indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.10.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/js8.56.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.11.14indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema2.0.2indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.2.0indirect
npmacorn8.11.3indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmboolbase1.0.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcheerio1.0.0-rc.12indirect
npmcheerio-select2.1.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmcss-select5.1.0indirect
npmcss-what6.1.0indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmdom-serializer2.0.0indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler5.0.3indirect
npmdomutils3.1.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.56.0indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.5.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.16.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.2.0indirect
npmflatted3.2.9indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmglob7.2.0indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-link-extractor1.0.5indirect
npmhtmlparser28.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.0indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmmarked4.3.0indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnth-check2.1.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.3indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse57.1.2indirect
npmparse5-htmlparser2-tree-adapter7.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:md-check-link@0.0.5 pulls in 31 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.