Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 15:01 UTC

l0k18 / 9

GoCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

l0k18/9 holds a health index of 13 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (52/100) and lowest on Security (17/100). It was last updated 2647 days ago.

13
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

13
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 28 is calibrated to 22 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

l0k1Personal account
42 followers91 public repossince Jul 2016@indra-labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 2,647 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2,647
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases2 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,677 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv0.9.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,677
mean_days_between_releases0.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

21At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

30At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.7/25Owner reach42 followers of l0k18
25/25Track record91 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers42
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginl0k18
public_repos91
account_age_days3,687
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

17Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities59 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
4.4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: golang.org/x/crypto 0.0.0-20190513172903-22d7a77e9e5f (critical 10.0), google.golang.org/grpc 1.21.0 (critical 9.1), golang.org/x/net 0.0.0-20190522155817-f3200d17e092 (high 7.5), +1 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
21.6/40No advisories left outstanding4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,961 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories99
affected_packages4
assessed_packages34
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 2
direct_affected_packages4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 34 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history0 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
53.5/55Manageable file sizes23/845 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes1,189,115
source_files_sampled845
oversized_source_files23
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)pkg/rpc/api.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesdemos, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespkg/rpc/api.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
-contributors
0commits, last 12 months
2,647days since last push
2releases
-bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Contributor list unavailable
  • Could not fetch go package 'git.parallelcoin.io/dev/9' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.3 / 10
1.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 15:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities59 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Goekyu.moe/cryptonightv0.3.0go.mod
Gogit.parallelcoin.io/dev/tcellv1.0.0go.mod
Gogit.parallelcoin.io/dev/tviewv0.0.0-20190428075449-d7a9d6c70ab2go.mod
Gogithub.com/aead/siphashv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/aead/skeinv0.0.0-20160722084837-9365ae6e95d2go.mod
Gogithub.com/bitbandi/go-x11v0.0.0-20171024232457-5fddbc9b2b09go.mod
Gogithub.com/bitgoin/lyra2rev2v0.0.0-20161212102046-bae9ad2043bbgo.mod
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/go-socksv0.0.0-20170105172521-4720035b7bfdgo.mod
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/golangcryptov0.0.0-20150304025918-53f62d9b43e8go.mod
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/goleveldbv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/websocketv0.0.0-20150119174127-31079b680792go.mod
Gogithub.com/conformal/fastsha256v0.0.0-20160815193821-637e65642941go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/bboltv1.3.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/dchest/blake256v1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ebfe/keccakv0.0.0-20150115210727-5cc570678d1bgo.mod
Gogithub.com/gdamore/encodingv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/jessevdk/go-flagsv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kkdai/bstreamv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/lightninglabs/gozmqv0.0.0-20180324010646-462a8a753885go.mod
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/colorstringv0.0.0-20190213212951-d06e56a500dbgo.mod
Gogithub.com/programmer10110/gostreebogv0.0.0-20170704145444-a3e1d28291b2go.mod
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.0.0-20190513083848-b9f5b9457d44go.mod
Gogithub.com/smartystreets/goconveyv0.0.0-20190330032615-68dc04aab96ago.mod
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.4.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.0.0-20190513172903-22d7a77e9e5fgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.0.0-20190522155817-f3200d17e092go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.3.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.21.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/urfave/cli.v1v1.20.0go.mod
All dependencies 34

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Goekyu.moe/cryptonight0.3.0direct
Gogit.parallelcoin.io/dev/tcell1.0.0direct
Gogit.parallelcoin.io/dev/tview0.0.0-20190428075449-d7a9d6c70ab2direct
Gogithub.com/aead/siphash1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/aead/skein0.0.0-20160722084837-9365ae6e95d2direct
Gogithub.com/bitbandi/go-x110.0.0-20171024232457-5fddbc9b2b09direct
Gogithub.com/bitgoin/lyra2rev20.0.0-20161212102046-bae9ad2043bbdirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/go-socks0.0.0-20170105172521-4720035b7bfddirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/golangcrypto0.0.0-20150304025918-53f62d9b43e8direct
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/goleveldb1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/websocket0.0.0-20150119174127-31079b680792direct
Gogithub.com/conformal/fastsha2560.0.0-20160815193821-637e65642941direct
Gogithub.com/coreos/bbolt1.3.2direct
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/dchest/blake2561.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/ebfe/keccak0.0.0-20150115210727-5cc570678d1bdirect
Gogithub.com/gdamore/encoding1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/jessevdk/go-flags1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/kkdai/bstream1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/lightninglabs/gozmq0.0.0-20180324010646-462a8a753885direct
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful1.0.2direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidth0.0.4direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/colorstring0.0.0-20190213212951-d06e56a500dbdirect
Gogithub.com/programmer10110/gostreebog0.0.0-20170704145444-a3e1d28291b2direct
Gogithub.com/rivo/uniseg0.0.0-20190513083848-b9f5b9457d44direct
Gogithub.com/smartystreets/goconvey0.0.0-20190330032615-68dc04aab96adirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomic1.4.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20190513172903-22d7a77e9e5fdirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20190522155817-f3200d17e092direct
Gogolang.org/x/text0.3.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.21.0direct
Gogopkg.in/urfave/cli.v11.20.0direct
Gogithub.com/gdamore/tcell1.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 34 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20190513172903-22d7a77e9e5fdirectcritical493.4.0
google.golang.org/grpc1.21.0directcritical61.82.1
golang.org/x/net0.0.0-20190522155817-f3200d17e092directhigh3712.0.2
golang.org/x/text0.3.0directhigh70.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.