Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 18:28 UTC

laminas / laminas-dependency-plugin

Replace zendframework and zfcampus packages with their Laminas Project equivalents.

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 31 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#laminas#composer-plugin#zendframework#migration#expressive#mezzio#apigility#laminas-api-tools#hacktoberfest

laminas/laminas-dependency-plugin holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated 61 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Laminas ProjectOrganization
445 followers137 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistlaminas/laminas-dependency-plugin2.7.064,08521461 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

48Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

46Weak
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 61 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
12.6/18Commit volume — 24 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year24
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push61
active_weeks_last_year23

Release discipline

52Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 21 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 461 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~180.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tag2.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release461
mean_days_between_releases180.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

38Weak
How it's scored
24/60Stars — 31 stars
8/25Forks — 10 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars31
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

78Good
How it's scored
64.1/80Monthly downloads — 64,085 downloads/month across packagist
13.8/20Registry dependents — 118 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslaminas/laminas-dependency-plugin
dependents118
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads14,843,461
monthly_downloads64,085
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 33% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 33 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.326

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
39.8/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
19.2/30PR acceptance — 32/50 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs32
open_issues1
closed_issues18
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.947
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

92Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
19/25Owner reach — 445 followers of laminas
25/25Track record — 137 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers445
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginlaminas
public_repos137
account_age_days2,705
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 461 days ago
20/20Version history — 21 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslaminas/laminas-dependency-plugin
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish461

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpcs.xml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaminas, composer-plugin, zendframework, migration, expressive, mezzio, apigility, laminas-api-tools, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 33 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated11
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive7
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpcs.xml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/16 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes38,865
source_files_sampled16
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

31GitHub stars
15contributors
24commits, last 12 months
61days since last push
21releases
2bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 18:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 92 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistamphp/amp3.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream2.1.2indirect
Packagistamphp/cache2.0.1indirect
Packagistamphp/dns2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parser1.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/pipeline1.2.3indirect
Packagistamphp/process2.0.3indirect
Packagistamphp/serialization1.0.0indirect
Packagistamphp/socket2.3.1indirect
Packagistamphp/sync2.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/ca-bundle1.5.10indirect
Packagistcomposer/composer2.2.26indirect
Packagistcomposer/metadata-minifier1.0.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/package-versions-deprecated1.11.99.5indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre1.0.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/spdx-licenses1.5.9indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdaverandom/libdns2.1.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer0.7.2indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator2.0.0indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/advanced-json-rpc3.2.1indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.5.3indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema5.3.1indirect
Packagistkelunik/certificate1.1.3indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-coding-standard2.5.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.7.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.7.0indirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstream1.6.12indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper4.5.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.3.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.6.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser1.5.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.32indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.6.31indirect
Packagistpsalm/plugin-phpunit0.19.3indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log2.0.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise2.11.0indirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.8indirect
Packagistroave/security-advisories—indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.11.0indirect
Packagistseld/phar-utils1.2.1indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard7.2.1indirect
Packagistspatie/array-to-xml3.4.4indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console5.4.47indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem6.4.30indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder6.4.31indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process6.4.31indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.4.30indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Packagistvimeo/psalm6.0.0indirect
Packagistwebimpress/coding-standard1.4.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.12.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with laminas/laminas-dependency-plugin. Read them side by side →

98symfony/symfonyThe Symfony PHP frameworkExceptional98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional98codeigniter4/CodeIgniter4Open Source PHP Framework (originally from EllisLab)Exceptional98Sylius/SyliusHeadless open-source eCommerce platform on top of PHP/Symfony/API PlatformExceptional98doctrine/ormDoctrine Object Relational Mapper (ORM)Exceptional98swagger-api/swagger-uiSwagger UI is a collection of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swagger-compliant API.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.