Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 17:55 UTC

laminas / laminas-servicemanager

Factory-Driven Dependency Injection Container

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 159 stars⑂ 62 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗

laminas/laminas-servicemanager holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (51/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Laminas ProjectOrganization

445 followers137 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	laminas/laminas-servicemanager	4.5.1	1,225,811	135	71 days ago	di dic dependency-injection servicemanager service-manager psr-11 laminas

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

64Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

46Weak

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 10 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
13/18	Commit volume — 27 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	27
human_commit_share	0.82
days_since_last_push	10
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 47 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 71 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~63 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	47
latest_release_tag	4.5.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	71
mean_days_between_releases	63

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate

How it's scored

35.7/60	Stars — 159 stars
14.9/25	Forks — 62 forks
7.4/15	Watchers — 22 watchers

Inputs used

forks	62
stars	159
watchers	22
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

99Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 1,225,811 downloads/month across packagist
19/20	Registry dependents — 718 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	laminas/laminas-servicemanager
dependents	718
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	59,637,068
monthly_downloads	1,225,811
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

41Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 64% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 74 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.641

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good

How it's scored

35.2/42	Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
21.3/30	PR acceptance — 134/189 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

merged_prs	134
open_issues	13
closed_issues	67
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.838
closed_unmerged_prs	55
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

92Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
19/25	Owner reach — 445 followers of laminas
25/25	Track record — 137 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	445
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	laminas
public_repos	137
account_age_days	2,708

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 71 days ago
20/20	Version history — 135 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	laminas/laminas-servicemanager
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	71

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.laminas.dev/laminas-servicemanager/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	dependency-injection, psr-11
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.laminas.dev/laminas-servicemanager/
docs_site	https://docs.laminas.dev/laminas-servicemanager/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 6/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 74 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
6/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	5.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	100
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 100 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

34At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.5/40	Legible commit history — 53 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.646
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 18 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.18

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/140 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	36,079
source_files_sampled	140
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — cookbook

Inputs used

example_dirs	cookbook
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

159GitHub stars

99contributors

27commits, last 12 months

10days since last push

47releases

1bus factor

13open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 62 ⇿

0Stars

62Forks

46Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 24Patch 18

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10

5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 17:54 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7	Code-Review	Found 6/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10	Contributors	project has 74 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
8	Vulnerabilities	2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	brick/varexporter	`^0.3.8 \|\| ^0.4.0 \|\| ^0.5.0 \|\| ^0.6.0 \|\| ^0.7.0`	composer.json
Packagist	laminas/laminas-stdlib	`^3.19`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/container	`^1.1 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 100

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	brick/varexporter	`0.7.0`	direct
Packagist	laminas/laminas-stdlib	`3.21.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	direct
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/cache	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/dns	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`2.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/process	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/socket	`2.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/package-versions-deprecated	`1.11.99.5`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	danog/advanced-json-rpc	`3.2.2`	indirect
Packagist	daverandom/libdns	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`1.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	dnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir	`0.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/annotations	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/lexer	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/language-server-protocol	`1.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/proxy-manager-lts	`1.0.18`	indirect
Packagist	kelunik/certificate	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	laminas/laminas-cli	`1.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	laminas/laminas-code	`4.16.0`	indirect
Packagist	laminas/laminas-coding-standard	`3.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	laminas/laminas-container-config-test	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	mikey179/vfsstream	`1.6.12`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/jsonmapper	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.6.1`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpbench/container	`2.2.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpbench/phpbench	`1.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`5.6.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`1.10.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`11.0.11`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`5.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`11.5.42`	indirect
Packagist	psalm/plugin-phpunit	`0.19.5`	indirect
Packagist	psr/cache	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.7`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`6.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`6.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`7.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`6.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`7.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`6.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`5.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`5.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	seld/jsonlint	`1.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	slevomat/coding-standard	`8.22.1`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/array-to-xml	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`3.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	staabm/side-effects-detector	`1.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.3.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`7.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`7.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`7.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`7.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`7.3.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.3.4`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`6.13.1`	indirect
Packagist	webimpress/coding-standard	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`1.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/glob	`4.7.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 100 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
phpunit/phpunit	`11.5.42`	indirect	high	1	`12.5.8`
symfony/process	`7.3.4`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.5`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records