Public record
Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 14:13 UTC

langgexyz / sub2api

Sub2API 一站式开源中转服务,让 Claude、Openai 、Gemini、Antigravity订阅统一接入,支持拼车共享,更高效分摊成本,原生工具无缝使用。

Go · VueLGPL-3.0★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

langgexyz/sub2api holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

langgexyzPersonal account
16 followers120 public repossince Jun 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/Wei-Shaw/sub2apipoints to another repo — not scoredv0.1.162-1561 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume4,866 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year4,866
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases62 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count62
latest_release_tagv0.1.153
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases1.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (LGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 37% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.368
How it's scored
23.6/42Issue resolution56% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance87/87 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs87
open_issues7
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.562
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8.8/25Owner reach16 followers of langgexyz
25/25Track record120 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers16
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginlanggexyz
public_repos120
account_age_days4,795
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.cjs, .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities87 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,377
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, backend/Makefile, deploy/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.cjs, .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingfrontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, backend/Makefile, deploy/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
53.4/55Manageable file sizes67/2,235 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes1,779,507
source_files_sampled2,235
oversized_source_files67

Key facts

0GitHub stars
100contributors
4,866commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
62releases
3bus factor
7open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/Wei-Shaw/sub2api' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Wei-Shaw/sub2api); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 14:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities87 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 68
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Goentgo.io/entv0.14.5backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmockv1.5.2backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/alicebob/miniredis/v2v2.38.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/alitto/pond/v2v2.6.2backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.5backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.10backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.10backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.97.3backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.14backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dgraph-io/ristrettov0.2.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.9.1backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.2.2backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/wirev0.7.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/imroc/req/v3v3.57.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.2backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/langgexyz/ccgwv0.0.0-20260602022524-bb04ba51b710backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.10.9backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatiblebackend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/pquerna/otpv1.5.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/redis/go-redis/v9v9.17.2backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/refraction-networking/utlsv1.8.2backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.25.6backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/smartwalle/alipay/v3v3.2.29backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.18.2backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stripe/stripe-go/v85v85.0.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go/modules/postgresv0.40.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go/modules/redisv0.40.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.18.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/tidwall/sjsonv1.2.5backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/tiktoken-go/tokenizerv0.8.0backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/wechatpay-apiv3/wechatpay-gov0.2.21backend/go.mod
Gogithub.com/zeromicro/go-zerov1.9.4backend/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.24.0backend/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.51.0backend/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.39.0backend/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.35.0backend/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.55.0backend/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0backend/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0backend/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1backend/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1backend/go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.44.3backend/go.mod
npm@airwallex/components-sdk^1.30.2frontend/package.json
npm@lobehub/icons^4.0.2frontend/package.json
npm@stripe/stripe-js^9.0.1frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/vue-virtual^3.13.23frontend/package.json
npm@vueuse/core^10.7.0frontend/package.json
npmaxios^1.16.0frontend/package.json
npmchart.js^4.4.1frontend/package.json
npmdompurify^3.3.1frontend/package.json
npmdriver.js^1.4.0frontend/package.json
npmfile-saver^2.0.5frontend/package.json
npmmarked^17.0.1frontend/package.json
npmpinia^2.1.7frontend/package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4frontend/package.json
npmvue^3.4.0frontend/package.json
npmvue-chartjs^5.3.0frontend/package.json
npmvue-draggable-plus^0.6.1frontend/package.json
npmvue-i18n^9.14.5frontend/package.json
npmvue-router^4.2.5frontend/package.json
npmxlsx^0.18.5frontend/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.