Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 14:44 UTC
laravel / livewire-starter-kit
laravel/livewire-starter-kit holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.
78
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
LaravelOrganization
10,895 followers134 public repossince Aug 2011
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | laravel/livewire-starter-kit | v1.0.1 | 16,322 | 2 | 506 days ago | frameworklaravel |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
84
Development activity
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 29.8/36 | Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 141 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 141 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 43 |
Release discipline
68Good
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 2 releases published |
| 7.2/36 | Release recency — latest release 506 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 2 |
| latest_release_tag | v1.0.1 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 506 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 0.2 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
52
Popularity & adoption
72Good
How it's scored
| 43.9/60 | Stars — 510 stars |
| 19.7/25 | Forks — 229 forks |
| 8/15 | Watchers — 28 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 229 |
| stars | 510 |
| watchers | 28 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 0/22.5 | License — no license file detected |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | no |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
56Moderate
How it's scored
| 56.2/80 | Monthly downloads — 16,322 downloads/month across packagist |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it |
Inputs used
| packages | laravel/livewire-starter-kit |
| dependents | 0 |
| ecosystems | packagist |
| total_downloads | 416,404 |
| monthly_downloads | 16,322 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
65
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 43.2/54 | Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 18.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 56 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 4 |
| contributors_sampled | 56 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.195 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 0/30 | PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 0 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | — |
| prs_decided_7d | — |
| prs_merged_30d | — |
| prs_decided_30d | — |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 0 |
| first_time_authors_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization |
| 25/25 | Owner reach — 10,895 followers of laravel |
| 25/25 | Track record — 134 public repos, account ~14 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 10,895 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | laravel |
| public_repos | 134 |
| account_age_days | 5,460 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
71Good
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist |
| 14/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 506 days ago |
| 12/20 | Version history — 2 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | laravel/livewire-starter-kit |
| ecosystems | packagist |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 506 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
71
Engineering practices
88Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 1 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — phpstan.neon |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
45Weak
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://laravel.com/starter-kits |
| 0/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://laravel.com/starter-kits |
| docs_site | https://laravel.com/starter-kits |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | no |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
69
Security posture
69Good
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 2.2/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 0/2.5 | License — license file not detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 5/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 6.9 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
35
Agent context & guidance
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
53Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — phpstan.neon |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 0/10 | Reproducible environment |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — Blade without a type-check config |
| 54.4/55 | Manageable file sizes — 1/91 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Blade |
| largest_source_bytes | 64,432 |
| source_files_sampled | 91 |
| oversized_source_files | 1 |
Key facts
510GitHub stars
56contributors
141commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
2releases
4bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 3 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 11 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 0 | License | license file not detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 10 | Pinned-Dependencies | all dependencies are pinned |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 10 | Token-Permissions | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 13
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | laravel/chisel | ^0.1.0 | composer.json |
| Packagist | laravel/fortify | ^1.37.2 | composer.json |
| Packagist | laravel/framework | ^13.17 | composer.json |
| Packagist | laravel/tinker | ^3.0 | composer.json |
| Packagist | livewire/blaze | ^1.0 | composer.json |
| Packagist | livewire/flux | ^2.13.1 | composer.json |
| Packagist | livewire/livewire | ^4.1 | composer.json |
| npm | @laravel/passkeys | ^0.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | @tailwindcss/vite | ^4.1.11 | package.json |
| npm | concurrently | ^9.0.1 | package.json |
| npm | laravel-vite-plugin | ^3.1 | package.json |
| npm | tailwindcss | ^4.0.7 | package.json |
| npm | vite | ^8.0.0 | package.json |
All dependencies 26
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 13 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @laravel/passkeys | ^0.2.0 | direct |
| npm | @tailwindcss/vite | ^4.1.11 | direct |
| npm | concurrently | ^9.0.1 | direct |
| npm | laravel-vite-plugin | ^3.1 | direct |
| npm | tailwindcss | ^4.0.7 | direct |
| npm | vite | ^8.0.0 | direct |
| Packagist | laravel/chisel | — | direct |
| Packagist | laravel/fortify | — | direct |
| Packagist | laravel/framework | — | direct |
| Packagist | laravel/tinker | — | direct |
| Packagist | livewire/blaze | — | direct |
| Packagist | livewire/flux | — | direct |
| Packagist | livewire/livewire | — | direct |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu | 4.9.5 | indirect |
| npm | @tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu | ^4.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu | ^1.29.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | fakerphp/faker | — | indirect |
| Packagist | larastan/larastan | — | indirect |
| Packagist | laravel/pail | — | indirect |
| Packagist | laravel/pao | — | indirect |
| Packagist | laravel/pint | — | indirect |
| Packagist | laravel/sail | — | indirect |
| Packagist | mockery/mockery | — | indirect |
| Packagist | nunomaduro/collision | — | indirect |
| Packagist | php | — | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/phpunit | — | indirect |
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.