Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-10 05:53 UTC

laravel / lsp

PHPNo license detected★ 254 stars⑂ 9 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolEditor extensionhow this is determined

laravel/lsp holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LaravelOrganization

10,965 followers140 public repossince Aug 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	laravel/lsp	v0.0.29	2,613	27	11 days ago	php laravel lsp language-server

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

71Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.9/36	Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 112 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	112
human_commit_share	0.91
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	10

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 26 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 11 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~5.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	26
latest_release_tag	v0.0.29
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	11
mean_days_between_releases	5.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

46Weak

How it's scored

39/60	Stars — 254 stars
7.5/25	Forks — 9 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	9
stars	254
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

45Weak

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

46Weak

How it's scored

45.6/80	Monthly downloads — 2,613 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	laravel/lsp
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	2,621
monthly_downloads	2,613
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

21At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
8.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	6
top_contributor_share	0.948

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate

How it's scored

29.7/42	Issue resolution — 71% of issues closed
25.3/30	PR acceptance — 38/45 decided PRs merged
4.3/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	38
open_issues	5
closed_issues	12
prs_merged_7d	4
prs_decided_7d	7
prs_merged_30d	7
prs_decided_30d	11
issue_closed_ratio	0.706
closed_unmerged_prs	7
first_time_authors_30d	5
first_time_prs_merged_30d	2
first_time_prs_decided_30d	6

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25	Owner reach — 10,965 followers of laravel
25/25	Track record — 140 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	10,965
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	laravel
public_repos	140
account_age_days	5,485

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20	Version history — 27 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	laravel/lsp
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

53Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

62Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
8/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1/2.5	CI-Tests — 6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
3/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 17 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	14
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	4
scorecard_aggregate	4.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	17
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	136
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 136 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

61Moderate

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.8/40	Legible commit history — 27 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.297
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	3,281

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.07
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.09

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/282 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	27,484
source_files_sampled	282
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

254GitHub stars

6contributors

112commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

26releases

1bus factor

5open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿

0Stars

9Forks

10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 10

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10

4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-10 05:52 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
4	CI-Tests	6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
6	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	17 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 136

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 136 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.4`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	brianium/paratest	`7.20.0`	indirect
Packagist	brick/math	`0.14.8`	indirect
Packagist	carbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types	`3.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	dflydev/dot-access-data	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/inflector	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/lexer	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	dragonmantank/cron-expression	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	egulias/email-validator	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	filp/whoops	`2.18.4`	indirect
Packagist	fruitcake/php-cors	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	graham-campbell/result-type	`1.1.4`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.11.1`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/uri-template	`1.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	hamcrest/hamcrest-php	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	jean85/pretty-package-versions	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	jolicode/jolinotif	`2.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	jolicode/php-os-helper	`0.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	laravel-zero/foundation	`12.54.1`	indirect
Packagist	laravel-zero/framework	`12.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/framework	`12.62.0`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`1.29.1`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/prompts	`0.3.18`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/serializable-closure	`2.0.13`	indirect
Packagist	league/commonmark	`2.8.2`	indirect
Packagist	league/config	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/flysystem	`3.34.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/flysystem-local	`3.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/mime-type-detection	`1.16.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	microsoft/tolerant-php-parser	`0.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	mockery/mockery	`1.6.12`	indirect
Packagist	monolog/monolog	`3.10.0`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	nesbot/carbon	`3.11.4`	indirect
Packagist	nette/schema	`1.3.5`	indirect
Packagist	nette/utils	`4.1.4`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`8.9.4`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/laravel-console-summary	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/laravel-console-task	`1.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/laravel-desktop-notifier	`2.10.0`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/termwind	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest	`4.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin	`4.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-arch	`4.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-mutate	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-profanity	`4.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpoption/phpoption	`1.9.5`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`12.5.7`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`6.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`8.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`12.5.29`	indirect
Packagist	psr/clock	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/simple-cache	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/collection	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/uuid	`4.9.2`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.9`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`4.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`7.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`7.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`8.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`7.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`8.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`7.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`6.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	staabm/side-effects-detector	`1.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	stillat/blade-parser	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/clock	`8.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/css-selector	`8.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/error-handler	`7.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`7.4.9`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`7.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-foundation	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/mailer	`7.4.12`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/mime	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-idn	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.38.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php83	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php85	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-uuid	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/routing	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`8.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation	`8.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/uid	`7.4.9`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-dumper	`7.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	ta-tikoma/phpunit-architecture-test	`0.8.7`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	tijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	vlucas/phpdotenv	`5.6.3`	indirect
Packagist	voku/portable-ascii	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`2.4.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 136 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.11.1`	indirect	high	9	`8.0.1`
league/commonmark	`2.8.2`	indirect	high	6	`2.9.0`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.11.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`2.12.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records